On BNET: Fix your remote like MacGyver
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 21st, 2008

Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 2:31 pm

Categories: On the test bench, Vista

Tags: 32-bit, Microsoft Windows Vista, Results Let, Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn), 64-Bit, Operating Systems, Microsoft Windows, Software, Processors, Semiconductors

The Tests

This time we’re going to use a purely synthetic benchmark - PassMark PerformanceTest 6.1.

Note:  With PassMark ratings, the higher the number, the better the score.

Each test was run four times and the lowest score from each run was discarded.  The remaining results were then averaged to produce a final PassMark rating.

The Results

Let’s look at the average PassMark rating for the four different platforms:

  • Vista 32-bit RTM
    PassMark rating: 1002.4
  • Vista 32-bit SP1
    PassMark rating: 972.3
  • Vista 64-bit RTM
    PassMark rating: 1183.1
  • Vista 64-bit SP1
    PassMark rating: 1128.8

Vista 32-bit RTM    Vista 32-bit SP1
Vista 32-bit RTM left, Vista 32-bit SP1 right

Vista 64-bit RTM    Vista 64-bit SP1
Vista 64-bit RTM left, Vista 64-bit SP1 right

Taking a closer look at the PassMark PerformanceTest output shows an almost across the board improvement in performance when comparing 64-bit to 32-bit Vista (only the disk component of the test showed a decline in performance on 64-bit). 

Note:  If you want to take a closer look at the results, you can download them here: Vista 32-bit RTM | Vista 32-bit SP1 | Vista 64-bit RTM | Vista 64-bit SP1.

Number Crunching

Some quick number crunching reveals some interesting data.

  • Windows Vista 32-bit SP1 gets a PassMark rating that’s 3.0% lower than Windows Vista 32-bit RTM.
  • Windows Vista 64-bit SP1 gets a PassMark rating that’s 4.6% lower than Windows Vista 64-bit RTM.

So far, we’re seeing PassMark ratings that are in line with earlier benchmarking tests comparing Vista RTM with Vista SP1 - that is, the SP1 system returns a lower PassMark rating than RTM.  OK, but this test was to compare 32-bit Vista against 64-bit Vista.  Doing this gives us some very interesting results:

  • Windows Vista 64-bit RTM gets a PassMark rating that’s 18.0% higher than Windows Vista 32-bit RTM.
  • Windows Vista 64-bit SP1 gets a PassMark rating that’s 16.1% higher than Windows Vista 32-bit SP1.

Advantage Vista 64-bit.

Boot Up Times

For completeness I also measured the boot up time.  I took this as the time from the boot loader to a usable desktop. 

Average results were as follows:

  • Vista 32-bit RTM
    Boot up time: 27 sec
  • Vista 32-bit SP1
    Boot up time: 31 sec
  • Vista 64-bit RTM
    Boot up time: 44 sec
  • Vista 64-bit SP1
    Boot up time: 42 sec

Advantage Vista 32-bit.

Next –>

Pages: 1 2 3

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 64 Talkback(s)
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked
Did you engage both of the processors in the 64bit test? if not, I think that the test is not fair because the real power features of the 64bit weren't being used.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: dcole81@... Posted on: 12/29/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Had the choice.  SniperCT | 02/21/08
I had the choice as well...  JT82 | 02/22/08
Message has been deleted.  fr0thy | 02/22/08
Printers, printers, printers.  cornpie | 02/22/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  g_keramidas@... | 02/21/08
Thanks ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/21/08
(nt)Boot up times are most likely due to to drivers  toadlife | 02/21/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/21/08
64 bit is great  mgrubb@... | 02/22/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  Magikx21 | 02/22/08
XPx64  yagijd | 02/22/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/21/08
PassMark is NOT a good test: use PCMark Vantage!  qmlscycrajg | 02/22/08
PassMark is NOT a good test: use PCMark Vantage!  qmlscycrajg | 02/22/08
defender is not sp1 compatible, at present.  VONDRASHEK@... | 02/22/08
Turn off your cap locks!  ShadeTree | 02/22/08
Maybe there's a difference...  James T. Kirk | 02/22/08
How would you know ....  ShadeTree | 02/22/08
Pleasant Surprise  NewlyVistafied | 02/22/08
Makes Sense  shassouneh | 02/22/08
Indeed, gamers were die hard Win 98 for a long time  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/22/08
Question for you  rhomp2002@... | 02/22/08
who's at fault?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/22/08
Print driver  yagijd | 02/22/08
64-bit is just better all around...  Narg | 02/22/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 02/22/08
Me too.  ShadeTree | 02/22/08
4GB RAM  DoubleJava | 02/22/08
3.5G RAM limit on Vista-32  CraiGrrr | 02/22/08
no 32 bit MS consumer OS will address full 4 gig  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/22/08
Slow adoption is the price of prior FUD  jpratchios@... | 02/22/08
A couple major problems with your post!  ShadeTree | 02/22/08
Usually an indication of anyone who uses  ItsTheBottomLine | 02/22/08
Oh God - the fruit forum is down the street  ItsTheBottomLine | 02/22/08
So is Vista 64 as fast as/faster than XP SP2?  hansonjb | 02/22/08
and is XP-64 still available? (nt)  wessonjoe | 02/22/08
MultiMedia rendering times would be good  dunn@... | 02/22/08
Interesting  John L. Ries | 02/22/08
Why do so many people care about boot-up times?  PB_z | 02/22/08
Good questoin...  ItsTheBottomLine | 02/22/08
shut downs  merc2dogs` | 04/25/08
We have 64 Bit Vista.  redtrain65 | 02/22/08
You didn't need Firefox.  ShadeTree | 02/22/08
Why wouldn't you use Firefox?  mnkyhead | 08/26/08
Good article  DemonX | 02/22/08
Can't run x64...  BitTwiddler | 02/22/08
Want a dual Vista  gestrate@... | 02/22/08
its simple  JamesDoyle | 02/22/08
64 bits will come in handy about 2064  Ole Man | 02/22/08
X64 -- Boy, I've been waiting for this!  Kromaethius | 02/22/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  prfesser | 02/22/08
SP1  lawryll@... | 02/22/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  thetruthhurts | 02/22/08
Another clueless MS basher...  jamesrayg | 02/22/08
Wowza  supercharlie | 02/23/08
So sayeth the MS shills!!  hbashman@... | 02/23/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  gesi28@... | 02/22/08
Yes, it is more than just memory.  CobraA1 | 02/23/08
As expected  CobraA1 | 02/22/08
The experience in 64 is better than your numbers show!  Narg | 02/24/08
How do the boot times compare with XP SP2 and Ubuntu?  srobtjones@... | 02/25/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  drhogan | 03/19/08
Help need a working benchmark for Vista 64-bit  schalk9917 | 04/13/08
RE: Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked  dcole81@... | 12/29/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here