On CNET: All about Apple iPad
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 28th, 2008

XP SP2 vs. Vista RTM vs. Vista SP1: Gaming benchmark

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 10:39 am

Categories: Admin

Tags: Game, Microsoft Windows XP, Service Pack 2, Microsoft Windows Vista, Microsoft Windows Vista SP1, Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn), Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2, Operating Systems, Microsoft Windows, Software

Conclusions

Because we’re juggling with a lot of data here, I’m going to try to present the conclusions as clearly and concisely as possible.

  • On the whole, applying SP1 to Vista makes little difference to most games.
  • Seven out of ten of the games tested produced frame rate averages which were lower under Vista than XP SP2.
  • However, a closer look at the numbers shows that when Vista is slower than XP SP2, the actual frame rate differences are only in the single digits.
  • The only exception to the above is Doom 3, which shows a drop of 19 frames per second on Vista RTM and 15 frames per second on Vista SP1.  This is the largest variation we saw during testing.
  • The three games which performed better on Vista than on XP SP2 were Call of Duty 4, F.E.A.R. and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion.
  • Vista gave The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion the best performance boost compared to XP SP2, working out at an average of 9 frames per second faster on Vista RTM and 13 frames per second faster on Vista SP1.

 So, what’s the bottom line?  Well, XP SP2 is still the better OS when it comes to gaming.  However, Vista is getting better.  Thanks to several performance updates from Microsoft, better drivers from hardware vendors and updates from the game makers themselves (a good example of this improvement is Oblivion, which was awful on Vista when it went RTM but has improved to the point where it’s actually better on Vista than on XP).  What would be interesting to try (although I don’t have the time to do this) would be to re-run the benchmarks with a bare, unpatched Vista RTM and compare this to Vista SP1 - my guess is that you’d see significant improvement.  Still, even comparing Vista SP1 to XP SP2, it’s clear that Vista has a long way to go before it can beat its older sibling.

Still, the fact that some gamers work better on Vista means that those after the maximum frame rates possible might want to set up dual boot systems.

As always, your mileage WILL vary!

Thoughts?

Note: Here are links to previous Vista benchmark posts:
1 -
Some systems showing incredible SP1 performance boost | 2 - Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked | 3 - Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Part Deux | 4 - Vista 32-bit vs. Vista 64-bit - Benchmarked | 5 - Vista: 32-bit vs. 64-bit & RTM vs. SP1 | 6 - Vista RTM vs. Vista SP1 - Office 2007 benchmarking.

<< Home >>

Pages: 1 2 3

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 70 Talkback(s)
It dosnt quite tell the whole story IMO
The Benchmarks are close enough to call it a tie but my own vista experiment had serious "in game" performance issues and glitches that left Vista a little annoying to enjoy gameplay.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Breetai Posted on: 03/24/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I wonder  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/08
Here are the ones I know  CobraA1 | 02/28/08
Doom3 and FEAR are OpenGL games  pa2004 | 02/28/08
True  Ben_E | 03/04/08
All were benched in DirectX 9 mode ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/28/08
Thanks for the info  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/08
DX9, DX10, DX10,000  iwillnotbestopped@... | 02/28/08
W.O.W. I think Vista retailers are alway a problrm; no return no refunds @  rtirman37@... | 02/29/08
What about OpenGL? [nt]  olePigeon | 02/28/08
sigh . . .  CobraA1 | 02/28/08
"making a big fuss about nothing"  itpro_z | 02/28/08
Yup.  CobraA1 | 02/28/08
Just for the record ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/28/08
Only the point that has been tiredly made since DOS.  CobraA1 | 02/28/08
Same can be said about games  voska1 | 02/28/08
Whoa there ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/28/08
why MS commisioned the study?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/28/08
Rather,  CraiGrrr | 02/29/08
There's some exceptions to that rule, Cobra...  nix_hed | 03/01/08
I have to agree with CobraA1 here...  neoanderthal | 02/29/08
The reason for that is...  Ben_E | 03/04/08
Vista is getting "better"  iwillnotbestopped@... | 02/28/08
XP was a turd.  CobraA1 | 02/28/08
so what?  tristesse27@... | 02/28/08
Windows stability...  nix_hed | 03/01/08
RE: XP SP2 vs. Vista RTM vs. Vista SP1: Gaming benchmark  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/28/08
True  CobraA1 | 02/28/08
RE: XP SP2 vs. Vista RTM vs. Vista SP1: Gaming benchmark  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/28/08
All this shows  soonerproud | 02/28/08
Why Spider and ATI?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/28/08
Agree to a point  soonerproud | 02/28/08
True ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/28/08
As for nVIDIA ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/28/08
Why not ATI 3870 x2 instead of nVidia 8800GS?  nix_hed | 03/01/08
not quite  james.faction | 02/28/08
Look at the difference  soonerproud | 02/28/08
Hardware refresh cycles.  rtk | 02/28/08
silly censor.  rtk | 02/28/08
We did have dual-socket systems, however...  nix_hed | 03/01/08
Interesting  nickoli0_z | 02/28/08
RE: XP SP2 vs. Vista RTM vs. Vista SP1: Gaming benchmark  Whocares5698 | 02/28/08
Hardocp  soonerproud | 02/28/08
Why?  nickoli0_z | 02/28/08
Vista not selling good is good for me  voska1 | 02/28/08
show me such a deal  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/28/08
Where do you live?  voska1 | 02/28/08
no web deals at all?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/28/08
They didn't lower the price because of Vista.  ShadeTree | 02/28/08
not from what the saleman says  voska1 | 02/28/08
Salesmen never lie, right? (NT)  soonerproud | 02/28/08
No when you know them and they aren't getting the commision  voska1 | 02/28/08
Fact is  soonerproud | 02/28/08
Vista SP1 vs. XP SP3?  techboy_z | 02/28/08
XP SP3  brainsmith | 02/29/08
I know why Vista really isn't selling....  techboy_z | 02/28/08
Vista is an English word  voska1 | 02/28/08
Who said Vista wasn't selling well?  ShadeTree | 02/28/08
Well is relative I guess  voska1 | 02/28/08
XP  soonerproud | 02/28/08
True  voska1 | 02/28/08
Home vs Business  zenwalker | 02/29/08
Veeesta  nickoli0_z | 02/28/08
Anandtech weighs in on SP1 VS RTM  eggmanbubbagee@... | 02/28/08
Microsoft: Windows XP faster than Vista SP1 in some cases  D-T-Schmitz | 02/28/08
Then change it  JABBER_WOLF | 02/28/08
Outstanding - only benchmarks I'm waiting for are Nero Vision and Xilisoft  boed | 02/29/08
SAME QUALITY, YET XP IS 6 YEARS OLD, LIKE USED CAR.  VONDRASHEK@... | 02/29/08
hmm  nix_hed | 03/01/08
RE: XP SP2 vs. Vista RTM vs. Vista SP1: Gaming benchmark  marks055@... | 03/23/08
It dosnt quite tell the whole story IMO  Breetai | 03/24/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here