On TV.com: LOST Season 6. Premiere Date. Announced.
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 7th, 2008

How long can AMD continue to blame Intel for its failures?

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 12:06 pm

Categories: AMD, AMD/ATI, Components, Graphics, Hardware, In the news, Industry, Intel, Legal, NVIDIA

Tags: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Intel Corp., Processors, Semiconductors, Hardware, Components, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

I have a policy on this blog of not passing judgment on what’s legal or not (in the words of Homer Simpson, that’s for the courts to decide) but I do keep wondering how long AMD are going to AMD vs. Intelcontinue blaming Intel for its failures instead of taking a look closer to home.

Here’s a rundown of the latest legal volley from AMD. I’ll let you take a look at this and come to your own conclusions. However, while there may or may not be merit to these accusations, but let’s face it, AMD’s problems boil down to one thing - a lack of compelling products.

Attention AMD - You can’t make money with outdated products!!!

When I look at AMD’s current product line, all I see is a forest of deadness. Intel has products trump every category of products going. Server, desktop, mobile, low-end, high-end, dual-core, quad-core. Intel has all these markets stitched up.

Instead of putting money into projects that might have made a difference (such as getting the Phenom processors out a year earlier than the company did - that would have been a good product a year or so ago!), AMD wasted time and money (hemorrhaged money might be a better term) on futile marketing fluff such as QuadFX. Even hardcore AMD fans have turned their backs on the company over the last 12 to 18 months. AMD is now pinning hopes on the triple-core Phenom X3, but the latest round of Intel price cuts have pretty much eliminated any advantage or appeal that this product might have had.

Also, take a look at AMD’s track record in the GPU market. Here’s a lucrative market but AMD/ATI endlessly offers up products that ultimately disappoint. NVIDIA doesn’t even have to break into a sweat keeping ahead of AMD/ATI. If AMD isn’t careful, NVIDIA will pound the company flat much like Intel has done.

AMD’s in trouble, and I don’t see any signs of a clear, competent recovery strategy. I don’t see how throwing money at lawyers will make much difference.

Thoughts?

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 38 Talkback(s)
Voice crying out in the wilderness...
Robbie, your grasp of written English may not be all that great, but your sentiment is *perfect*.

For all that many persons posting on this subject have said prior to you, they might as well be... (Read the rest)
Posted by: thx-1138_@... Posted on: 05/09/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Could not agree more  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/07/08
More is less, but again  klumper | 05/07/08
Price and performance  Anton Philidor | 05/07/08
Here's my take ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 05/07/08
As long as lawyers are still around  Prognosticator | 05/07/08
intel monopoly  nilsonjune | 05/07/08
Simple, its not what customers asked  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/07/08
becuase businesses  ivanotter | 05/08/08
AMD should get out of the CPU business  Joe_Raby | 05/07/08
Original athlon popularity  UNSRM | 05/08/08
intel monopoly  nilsonjune | 05/07/08
Posting twice doesn't help.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/07/08
RE: How long can AMD continue to blame Intel for its failures?  computergeek289 | 05/07/08
As I see it ...  P. Douglas | 05/07/08
I don't see it honestly  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/07/08
Quite frankly ...  P. Douglas | 05/07/08
Doubtful  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/07/08
The difference is  Michael Kelly | 05/08/08
What suckers  TheSuave | 05/08/08
did we mention...  ivanotter | 05/08/08
Timeline a bit off  klumper | 05/08/08
What? Only 12-core?  D. T. Schmitz | 05/07/08
See my comment below  Joe_Raby | 05/07/08
It's not a blame its' a ...  Cryogenic | 05/07/08
RE: How long can AMD continue to blame Intel for its failures?  Joe_Raby | 05/07/08
Directed to "_dietrich"  Joe_Raby | 05/07/08
If it were not for AMD....  mrlinux | 05/08/08
Answer: Until the End of Time  nucrash | 05/08/08
It isn't just AMD complaining  jacksonhole | 05/08/08
RE: How long can AMD continue to blame Intel for its failures? Forever!  Pyrotech_z | 05/08/08
RE: How long can AMD continue to blame Intel for its failures?  trick1 | 05/08/08
This is a pathetic, shrill, paper-thin blog  WarEagle | 05/08/08
*shrugs*  ivanotter | 05/08/08
Research is the key  cherullo | 05/08/08
You are wrong  oleoleoleoleole | 05/08/08
Voice crying out in the wilderness...  thx-1138_@... | 05/09/08
Voice crying out in the wilderness...  thx-1138_@... | 05/09/08
ZDNet editors?  bestdestiny | 05/08/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here