On TV.com: 2009's Most PIRATED TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

June 5th, 2008

Browser memory usage - the good, the bad, and the down right ugly!

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 4:59 am

Categories: On the test bench, Software

Tags: Opera Software, Mozilla Firefox 3.0, Mozilla Firefox, Web Browser, Results Here, Web Browsers, Internet, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

So how much memory do modern web browsers consume when pushed hard? This was the question prompted by my Firefox 3.0 a memory hog? post yesterday.

So how do the browsers stack up against each other?

The Test

I took six identical VMware virtual PCs, running Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 32-bit. The systems were given a meager 512Mb of RAM. We then took the browsers for a one hour browsing session, visiting some of the Internet’s best “hot sheets” websites and loading up 30 tabs for each browser. I also accessed and made use of several Google services (such as Gmail and Google Analytics).

Note: I tried to keep the browsing as similar as possible for all the browsers.

The Results

Here are the results:

Browser memory usage - the good, the bad, and the ugly!

So, we have the good (Opera 9.27 and Firefox 3.0 RC2), the bad (Opera 9.50B2, Safari 3.1.1, and Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1), and the ugly (Internet Explorer 7).

What’s interesting is that if I were to list the browsers in order of sluggishness when running with 30 tabs open, the order would be the same as for the memory usage, with IE7 being the most sluggish and Firefox 3.0 RC2 and Opera 9.27 being the most responsive.

Thoughts?

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 55 Talkback(s)
K-Meleon does the job very well
Thanks for the suggestion. I am trying K-Meleon now. It seems blazing fast on my ancient machine (Win 98SE, 192MB RAM). I am ditching FF 2, IE 6, Netscape 8.1 & Opera 9.5 for good. No luck for trying ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: sunder_rao Posted on: 07/27/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Just for fun: could you add Epiphany, Konqueror and Dillo?  pjotr123 | 06/05/08
Pjotr as a Linux pro  tech_walker | 06/05/08
Several....  pjotr123 | 06/05/08
KDE  bportlock | 06/05/08
Thanks  marks055@... | 06/05/08
System Monitor  FreewheelinFrank | 06/06/08
Ditto K-Meleon.  roystonlodge | 06/20/08
K-Meleon does the job very well  sunder_rao | 07/27/08
are these raw figures  s_souche | 06/05/08
Real world or tweaked...  storm14k | 06/05/08
Could you add Firefox 2?  celeriun@... | 06/05/08
RE: Browser memory usage - the good, the bad, and the down right ugly!  alxnsc@... | 06/05/08
Hmmm....seems some people spoke too soon...  storm14k | 06/05/08
Is browser speed/memory consumption really an issue?  ye | 06/05/08
It is, if you aren't using a top PC model  raul62 | 06/05/08
I've used XP on a P3-600MHz system with 384MB or RAM  ye | 06/05/08
The topic is "browsers", not XP or Vista *again*.  Zogg | 06/05/08
Thanks captin obvious.  ye | 06/05/08
And yet, if you reread your own responses...  Zogg | 06/05/08
I am always amazed at how many people in these forums...  ye | 06/06/08
With Firefox 2 the longer you left it on the more  tech_walker | 06/05/08
No. I run FF 2 on the following two configurations and...  ye | 06/05/08
Leak shows up after long periods  storm14k | 06/05/08
I leave the system logged in when not in use.  ye | 06/06/08
Is the speed of the browser really an issue?  thungurknifur | 06/17/08
your question shows the problem with s/w dev today  ismoore | 06/07/08
Browser speed and memory efficiency are big issues  pointzerotwo | 06/17/08
A good job of work,  mhenriday | 06/05/08
memory is too cheap to worry about this...  Narg | 06/05/08
Funny, none of my PCs support 8 GB of RAM.  Zogg | 06/05/08
Indeed!  DavidIMcIntosh | 06/05/08
Exacty.. that is why we need these articles! (NT)  JCitizen | 06/06/08
That's Funny  IT C0wboy | 06/06/08
Not funny  djchandler | 06/06/08
You must enter a title for your message  krkosska | 06/10/08
Only if your lucky enough...  JCitizen | 06/06/08
I'm so glad that you have money to burn!  Zogg | 06/07/08
That's good, IF you're running 64bit Vista  Dr. John | 06/10/08
Memory is NOT cheap for all systems...  liquidglow | 06/17/08
Opera  Stuka | 06/05/08
me too  bmeacham98@... | 06/06/08
Does Opera still need to runas Admin in Vista?  marks055@... | 06/05/08
No it doesn't  tech_walker | 06/05/08
Process Explorer Results  k12IT | 06/05/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 06/05/08
RE: Browser memory usage - the good, the bad, and the down right ugly!  Gis Bun | 06/06/08
Memory usage rises when  rebelxhardcore | 06/06/08
... but aren't they all using the same plugins?  ismoore | 06/07/08
RE: Browser memory usage - the good, the bad, and the down right ugly!  dirtfandc | 06/07/08
RE: Browser memory usage - the good, the bad, and the down right ugly!  tommcd64 | 06/12/08
Memory usage & speed not important? Idiot!  LittleGuy | 06/17/08
RE: Browser memory usage - the good, the bad, and the down right ugly!  terjeb@... | 06/17/08
It has never occurred to me...  {DvT}Hex | 06/17/08
freeing up memory  jwp41@... | 06/17/08
Best way to check mem usage on Win 98  sunder_rao | 07/26/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here