On last.fm: 2009 summer music festivals
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 30th, 2008

Psystar retains Apple-beating law firm

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 12:50 pm

Categories: Apple, Industry, Legal

Tags: Law Firm, Apple Inc., Burst.com Inc., Psystar, Litigation, Business Operations, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Court documents filed yesterday show that Mac-clone company Psystar has retained a Californian law firm which has tangled with Apple before - and won.

The law firm in question is Carr & Ferrell, a company which specializes in intellectual property law. This was the law firm which represented Burst.com in a patent infringement case against Apple dating back from 2006 (this was settled last year when Apple agreed to pay Burst.com $10 million). The law firm also backed Burst.com when it went up against Microsoft, a move which earned the company $60 million in an out of court settlement.

The documents filed yesterday extends Psystar’s deadline to respond to the lawsuit from next Monday to August 18.

I still don’t fancy Psystar’s chances of being able to beat Apple in court, but this latest move means that case just got a lot more exciting.

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 155 Talkback(s)
Interesting forum, Apple needs to see an open door...
Sorry for the duplicate post, a warning said no more replies accepted for the comment.

Apple should sell a "geek" version of OS X that will (or will only) install on a newer PC that is already ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: senor_rudy Posted on: 08/11/08  (Edited: 08/11/08 @ 12:43) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Modifying code is still wrong  jake_11 | 07/30/08
Depends on what code they modified  Thought1 | 07/30/08
OS X is not covered by the GPL,,,  Intellihence | 07/30/08
The kernel is..  mrlinux | 07/31/08
Actually it's BSD I think  wolf_z | 07/31/08
You are more right than I am on this,,,  mrlinux | 07/31/08
You can download the source code for 10.5 right now  j.m.galvin | 07/31/08
It is sad that Apple uses Open Source as a selling point  hamobu | 07/31/08
To make matters worse  Intellihence | 07/30/08
re: To make matters worse  none none | 07/31/08
It depends on if it's legal to.  TripleII | 07/30/08
Two Arguments  Harry Bardal | 07/30/08
Neither.  TripleII | 07/30/08
What if I sold you a car...  hamobu | 07/31/08
Hopefully you read the sticker and made an  James Quinn | 07/31/08
However...  hamobu | 07/31/08
...  Badgered | 07/31/08
Doesn't the exterior of a shrink wrapped OSX box  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Even Apple does not read it's own EULA  hamobu | 07/31/08
@Jim: 'System Requirements' means technical, not Legal requirements  hamobu | 07/31/08
Ah but Apple does list clearly "Macintosh"  James Quinn | 07/31/08
There is a limit to what you can do to defend your reputation.  hamobu | 07/31/08
Well as long as it is understood by all parties that  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Not sure about support...  hamobu | 07/31/08
Not saying break intentionally that should not be  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Apple must not break other people's property  hamobu | 07/31/08
There is where you are wrong...  James Quinn | 08/01/08
Actually  Bozzer | 07/31/08
There's a Name for That...  Harry Bardal | 07/31/08
Actually there is better name for that  tdhowe | 07/31/08
Free market  tikigawd | 07/31/08
Modifying...  BillDem | 07/30/08
Licenses  rpmyers1 | 07/30/08
OS X is cheap for a reason  Ken_z | 07/31/08
Except, of course, this is product tying  wolf_z | 07/31/08
Correct  hamobu | 07/31/08
re: Modifying code is still wrong  deaf_e_kate | 07/31/08
re-selling has been legal since the dawn of time  hamobu | 07/31/08
I hope Apple gets punished for this  NonZealot | 07/30/08
I'd be shocked if Psystar was funding this themselves  Michael Kelly | 07/30/08
I think the lawyers retained  Pliny the Elder | 07/30/08
Contingency fee?  djchandler | 07/30/08
Was Psystar a front to begin with?  rdawson@... | 07/31/08
I've wondered that myself (nt)  Michael Kelly | 07/31/08
They had partners with big pockets from the start  soonerproud | 07/31/08
this from a guy who runs vista. (n/m)  lostarchitect | 07/30/08
RE: this from a guy who runs vista  celeriun@... | 07/30/08
He speaks poorly of the EULA.  Intellihence | 07/30/08
Except...  Sleeper Service | 07/31/08
re: Except...  none none | 07/31/08
nope, not an xbox.  rtk | 07/31/08
Windows Boy Strikes Again...Move On  mahalotmm | 07/30/08
NonZealot, AGAIN, clearly doesn't live up to his name...  pbromelkamp | 07/30/08
Irony.  Sleeper Service | 07/31/08
No Irony  MacCanuck | 07/31/08
Losing a choice of OS good for consumers?  daftkey | 07/31/08
How so?  wolf_z | 07/31/08
We've seen this experiement before, in much more favorable conditions.  daftkey | 07/31/08
not sure Psystar has a shot  tech_walker | 07/31/08
RE: Psystar retains Apple-beating law firm  celeriun@... | 07/30/08
I wouldn't call it a slam dunk.  TripleII | 07/30/08
RE: Psystar retains Apple-beating law firm  brenworth | 07/30/08
I beg to differ,,,  Intellihence | 07/30/08
Except  adinsx | 07/31/08
Hey now!  tikigawd | 07/31/08
Really now?  Rick_K | 07/31/08
Wow, the case... really?  tikigawd | 08/01/08
Competition  Harry Bardal | 07/30/08
I beg to differ on one point  Pliny the Elder | 07/30/08
I agree with one exception.  TripleII | 07/30/08
And that's the exception that matters here.  rtk | 07/30/08
It never was illegal. You proved my whole premise!  TripleII | 07/30/08
How about looking here?  Rick_K | 07/30/08
Same as best buy.  TripleII | 07/30/08
Just going by what Apple said.  Rick_K | 07/31/08
"Mac" is perhaps purposely ambiguous  djchandler | 07/30/08
Not really.  Rick_K | 07/31/08
Like Chevrolet and Chevy  j.m.galvin | 08/01/08
Consider this...  smdunn | 07/31/08
The headline is bit misleading.  A Grain of Salt | 07/30/08
It seems to me people are hoping Apple wins.  TripleII | 07/30/08
I think it comes down to...  A Grain of Salt | 07/30/08
A major assumption  Ken_z | 07/31/08
It would be a bit more than that..  daftkey | 07/31/08
You are right.  TripleII | 07/31/08
What would be next? Wii clones?  scoobyJ | 07/31/08
There's a distinction you're missing  laura.b | 07/31/08
In many ways I agree with your last statement.  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Depends  laura.b | 07/31/08
What if the requirements list says "Mactioosh"?  James Quinn | 07/31/08
System requirements are not legal requirements  hamobu | 07/31/08
Well I don't see Apple going after joe consumer  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Joe consumer and Joe Corporation have same property rights  hamobu | 07/31/08
Well  laura.b | 08/01/08
re: in many ways  Badgered | 07/31/08
Depends on how your read that...  James Quinn | 07/31/08
You go by comon understanding.  hamobu | 07/31/08
Macintosh with is not that unclear as I love ewe..:P  James Quinn | 07/31/08
No, it doesn't  Badgered | 07/31/08
A simple question.  Rick_K | 07/31/08
I am all for wii clones  hamobu | 07/31/08
Installing an OS on your own hardware.  ted185@... | 07/31/08
Just the way I feel about the whole subject....  James Quinn | 07/31/08
As long as you are not restricting others...  hamobu | 07/31/08
Yet.....  James Quinn | 07/31/08
nope...  hamobu | 07/31/08
As a consumer perhaps but not as an OEM...  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Joe Consumer and Joe Corporation are same under the law  hamobu | 07/31/08
Go Psystar !  jpr75_z | 07/31/08
RE: OS X is cheap for a reason *NEW*  absent | 07/31/08
Seems Logical  dmcclin | 07/31/08
That is because you are not considering that once  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Still at some point Apple is charging $ for Service packs.  hamobu | 07/31/08
Disagree......  James Quinn | 07/31/08
Apple does put out new versions of it's OS quite frequently...  hamobu | 07/31/08
You'd have to actually use them...  Rick_K | 07/31/08
RE: Psystar retains Apple-beating law firm  super_J | 07/31/08
EULA is only one part of Apple complaint  j.m.galvin | 07/31/08
I disagree  hamobu | 07/31/08
Cocoa Puffs?  aj.redmond@... | 07/31/08
Actually...  John L. Ries | 07/31/08
Except that  j.m.galvin | 07/31/08
So...  John L. Ries | 08/01/08
You are simply wrong  j.m.galvin | 08/01/08
J. M.: I'll concede the point in part  John L. Ries | 08/01/08
J, Reis  j.m.galvin | 08/01/08
One last point  John L. Ries | 08/01/08
Not heart of case  j.m.galvin | 08/01/08
Is delete an replace modify?  TripleII | 07/31/08
The updates  j.m.galvin | 07/31/08
Is an indication that they're taking this seriously  John L. Ries | 07/31/08
Apple does put out new versions of it's OS quite frequently...  hamobu | 07/31/08
actually just read the EULA on OS X  YZFDude1@... | 07/31/08
There was similar restriction on iTunes for windows  hamobu | 07/31/08
it's a great point, and there's no fault in posting it  rtk | 07/31/08
re: actually just read the EULA on OS X  none none | 07/31/08
Two little problems  j.m.galvin | 07/31/08
Is Psystar an end user?  senor_rudy | 08/10/08
EULAs are untested.  TripleII | 07/31/08
Correction  John L. Ries | 07/31/08
Read the Apple complaint  j.m.galvin | 07/31/08
Sure  tikigawd | 07/31/08
Why is it laughable?  A Grain of Salt | 08/01/08
It's laughable because  laura.b | 08/01/08
Laura, the law does not agree with you  j.m.galvin | 08/01/08
No, you're not understanding  laura.b | 08/01/08
What laura said  tikigawd | 08/01/08
J. M.: Clarification please  John L. Ries | 08/01/08
J. Ries: News & Comment exempt  j.m.galvin | 08/01/08
@J.M. Galvin  tikigawd | 08/01/08
Apple could take advantage of the Psystar market!  senor_rudy | 08/11/08
Same thing, I wasn't clear.  TripleII | 07/31/08
RE: Psystar retains Apple-beating law firm  NKX | 08/01/08
RE: Psystar retains Apple-beating law firm  mhannon | 08/04/08
Interesting forum, Apple needs to see an open door...  senor_rudy | 08/11/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads