On The Insider: Sheryl Crow Heads to Cougar Town
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 14th, 2008

Microsoft to push another Windows Update to users ... whether you want it or not

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 8:35 am

Categories: Microsoft, Software, Stealth Update

Tags: Microsoft Windows Update, Update, Microsoft Corp., Microsoft Windows, Operating Systems, Software, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Back in September of 2007 Microsoft carried out what I and many others at the time considered to be a pretty big breach of trust and pushed a stealth update for the Windows Update mechanism. What’s wrong with that, you might ask? Well, as it turned out the update disrupted some Windows XP users ability to repair their installation. Not good, and precisely the reason why there are some people who like to know exactly what is being installed on their systems, and control when that happens.

Well, according to Microsoft, there’s another update to the Windows Update mechanism ready to be unleashed. The difference between this update and the stealth update from back in 2007 is that Microsoft is being more open about this update and actually talking about it before it hits the download servers and starts getting installed on systems.

Why update Windows Update?

Here’s the reason given by Microsoft:

So what are we doing this time? Well, this particular update won’t really change the way the client looks or feels to you, but you may notice some improvements in the length of time it takes Windows Update to scan for updates and how quickly you’ll receive signature updates.  For example, in this update, we’ve invested heavily in reducing the amount of time it takes the Windows Update agent to scan to see if new updates are available.  In this case, we’ve seen some instances of the scan times on some machines decreasing almost 20 percent.

Who will get this update automatically?

It depends on your Windows Update settings. Under Windows Vista there are four possible settings for Windows Update:

  • Install updates automatically (recommended)
  • Download updates but let me choose whether to install them
  • Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them
  • Never check for updates (not recommended)

Similarly, under Windows XP there are four settings:

  • Automatic (recommended)
  • Download updates for me, but let me choose when to install them
  • Notify me but don’t automatically download or install them
  • Turn off Automatic Updates

This update to the Windows Update agent will be updated automatically on both Windows Vista and Windows XP systems unless Windows Update has been switched off. That is, set to Never check for updates (not recommended) under Vista or Turn off Automatic Updates under XP. All tghe other settings will be taken by Microsoft has an indication that you want these updates to the Windows Update mechanism to come in and be installed.

If you don’t want this update to come in, you need to make these changes soon.

My thoughts …

My take on this is that the way that Windows Update updates itself is still flawed if updates are pushed to users who have explicitly stated that they don’t want updates to be installed without permission, or don’t want updates downloaded or installed without their consent. After all, if you don’t feel that way, why bother setting it up that way? It’s a very weak argument to suggest that Windows Update is on unless it is switched off and to override what seem to me like clear choices that users have set to allow them to have control over what comes in and is installed. If the wording on these settings wasn’t clear enough or there were exceptions, Microsoft should have taken Vista SP1/XP SP3 as an opportunity to clarify things.

I just can’t understand why Download updates but let me choose whether to install them or Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them doesn’t mean what it says it means and why Microsoft can’t accept that. As they stand, these settings are misleading at best.

That said, I’ve installed this update on a couple of systems and so far haven’t come across any negative side effects.

Which operating systems will get the update?

This update will apply to:

  • Windows Vista 32-bit/64-bit
  • Windows Server 2003
  • Windows XP 32-bit/64-bit
  • Windows 2000 Advanced Server/Datacenter Server

More information

Further details about this update can be found here.

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 58 Talkback(s)
While we're out there trusting...
We ought to put our faith in companies like Enron and Worldcom while we're at it.

The point is that updates, however well-intentioned, can potentially disrupt operations.

Is your everyday home system critical?... (Read the rest)
Posted by: oshea00 Posted on: 08/25/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I agree completely  Badgered | 08/14/08
Adrain Gets It Right, Again!  chessmen | 08/14/08
RE: Microsoft to push another Windows Update to users ... whether you want it or not  Loverock Davidson | 08/14/08
Last time it happened...  jasonp@... | 08/14/08
Ok  Loverock Davidson | 08/14/08
OMG  thelivo | 08/14/08
OMG OMG OMG!  Loverock Davidson | 08/14/08
Ummm  daengbo | 08/15/08
..caused problems to users  tulsatech | 08/15/08
....  Linux User 147560 | 08/17/08
Quit crying...  dwr50 | 08/14/08
How asinine...  zenotek | 08/14/08
They don't get it...  storm14k | 08/14/08
Linux yes, Apple no  beoz | 08/14/08
While we're out there trusting...  oshea00 | 08/25/08
Here's what MS should do in this case....  JT82 | 08/14/08
Those 4 settings are for standard updates.  osreinstall | 08/14/08
RE ...  n0neXn0ne | 08/14/08
What's different  laura.b | 08/14/08
re: What's different  none none | 08/14/08
Are you sure about that?  ye | 08/14/08
No  beoz | 08/14/08
Partially correct...  Linux User 147560 | 08/17/08
No you don't  osreinstall | 08/14/08
Um...NO  laura.b | 08/15/08
Regarded Wrong  osreinstall | 08/14/08
Why shouldn't the settings apply to all updates?  ye | 08/14/08
Must be the control freak in them.  osreinstall | 08/14/08
@ye  thungurknifur | 08/14/08
For those "disaffected"...  thx-1138_@... | 08/16/08
Only Microsoft owns Windows  ThePrairiePrankster | 08/14/08
I agree...  mrdt | 08/14/08
And Do not forget  GuidingLight | 08/14/08
Linux doesn't have EULA  chemist109 | 08/14/08
You apparently didn't get it  laura.b | 08/15/08
I believe...  storm14k | 08/14/08
That doesn't equal ownership  laura.b | 08/15/08
Then get rid of the other "options"  jasonp@... | 08/14/08
I agree with you 100%  ThePrairiePrankster | 08/14/08
RE: Microsoft to push another Windows Update to users ... whether you want it or not  reverseswing | 08/14/08
No, what he's saying is...  jasonp@... | 08/14/08
For Microsoft and Its Apologists  Cardhu | 08/16/08
Amen  WATKINS12@... | 08/15/08
That is Not What The Article Says  Cardhu | 08/16/08
Which is worse? MS and stealth downloads or Apple remotely nuking apps?  transposeIT | 08/15/08
Worse?  laura.b | 08/15/08
I Agree  Cardhu | 08/16/08
Apple Remotely Nuking Apps Is Worse (NT)  chessmen | 08/15/08
Microsoft Has A Much Longer History of Perfidy  Cardhu | 08/16/08
Well, at least there's a warning this time.  laura.b | 08/15/08
I Think You've Hit on Something  hforman@... | 08/15/08
RE: Microsoft to push another Windows Update to users ... whether you want it or not  johngayfer@... | 08/15/08
And turning "Automatic" off?  RS9 | 08/15/08
Why scan my whole pc?  prikkebeen | 08/15/08
It's called "WGA"  RS9 | 08/15/08
WGA?  prikkebeen | 08/15/08
RE: Microsoft to push another Windows Update to users ... whether you want it or not  deadguy69@... | 08/15/08
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer's Machines  Cardhu | 08/16/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here