On CBS MoneyWatch: Double Foreclosures for Nicolas Cage
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 20th, 2007

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ out - Still can't beat Intel's E6700

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 8:12 am

Categories: AMD

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Benchmarks

Today sees AMD release the Athlon 64 X2 6000+.  This is a dual core processor that runs at 3.0GHz and has 1MB of L2 cache per core (2MB in all). 

Hot Hardware have a review and it's performance is lackluster to say the least.  Compared to other AMD CPUs, yes, it's impressive, but compared to Intel's Core 2 Duo, well, here's what Hot Hardware have to say:

In comparison to all previous socket AM2 processor offerings, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a solid product. Its higher clock speeds make it the fastest AM2 processor ever released, which also make it the fastest desktop CPU ever to come out of AMD's fabs. In the shadow of Intel's Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Extreme X6800 processors though, the new X2 6000+ isn't quite as impressive. The Core 2 Duos consumed less power overall and performed better in just about every benchmark. AMD has priced the 6000+ aggressively, which somewhat compensates for the Core 2's higher performance.  The 6000+ is almost $500 cheaper than the Athlon 64 FX-62 was when it was launched, which markedly enhances its value proposition. And it's about $60 less expensive than the Core 2 Duo E6700.

What I don't understand is why AMD are still releasing updated Athlon 64 X2's that aren't faster that Intel's processors.  Seems to me that it could be spending  R&D money better on establishing a line that seriously beat Intel either on price or performance (or both).  A shift to a 65nm process would help - the 90nm process has been squeezed dry.

Still, that's a lot of pins on the business side of that processor!

How should AMD move forward?

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 72 Talkback(s)
It is also funny how you completely avoided....
... the fact that benchmarks prove you wrong. Instead all you did was cry about some perceived slight. Maybe if you were a little less sensitive and a little more fact based I would take you seriously.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ShadeTree Posted on: 02/22/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
AMD needs..  IAHawkeye | 02/20/07
We can agree on that  NonZealot | 02/20/07
Hmmm??  techboy_z | 02/20/07
The 6000+ is based on 90nm process  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/20/07
Um, yes...I read that already...  techboy_z | 02/21/07
You probably don't realize this ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/21/07
Maybe it's just me...  zkiwi | 02/20/07
Good question...  Wolfie2K3 | 02/20/07
I guess  zkiwi | 02/20/07
They don't know how to install Linux...  zoroaster | 02/20/07
Not "compatibility mode"  KTLA | 02/20/07
Actually I run Vista x64 on numerous systems ...  ShadeTree | 02/21/07
True ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/21/07
The scary part is that consumers ...  ShadeTree | 02/21/07
They probably chose 32-bit XP ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/21/07
AMD Counter Attack:  VonHelton | 02/20/07
4x4?  KTLA | 02/20/07
When Barcelona launches ....  ShadeTree | 02/20/07
Really?  KTLA | 02/20/07
The whole time AMD was beating Intel ...  ShadeTree | 02/20/07
What's good for the goose...  KTLA | 02/20/07
Intel's roadmap trumps AMD's for the foreseeable ...  ShadeTree | 02/20/07
"clear understanding"?  KTLA | 02/20/07
True  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/20/07
On floating point, it should beat Intel  georgeou | 02/20/07
MS sales tactics?  zoroaster | 02/20/07
MS?!?  Logics | 02/21/07
Meanwhile, back in the real world...  IslandBoy_77 | 02/20/07
P.S. to my last...  IslandBoy_77 | 02/20/07
Multicore Processors  dmhunter@... | 02/20/07
I just finished updating my  Linux User 147560 | 02/20/07
You have spread so many falsehoods ...  ShadeTree | 02/20/07
Care to point out...  zkiwi | 02/20/07
W2K, XP and Vista all have support for SMP.  ShadeTree | 02/20/07
I do wonder...  zkiwi | 02/20/07
SMP, multiprocessor and multicore for ...  ShadeTree | 02/21/07
You've also forgotten...  zkiwi | 02/21/07
Now you are just making stuff up!  ShadeTree | 02/21/07
Shade, There is a difference at the OS level.  Logics | 02/21/07
*sigh*  zkiwi | 02/21/07
They don't share L2 cache it is divided ...  ShadeTree | 02/22/07
HAAA, Multicore & XP is laughable!!  Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 | 02/20/07
Independent benchmarks prove you wrong.  ShadeTree | 02/21/07
it's funny how quick people are around here to put other people down  Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 | 02/21/07
Your the one that put yourself down ....  ShadeTree | 02/21/07
Really Shadetree...  Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 | 02/21/07
It is also funny how you completely avoided....  ShadeTree | 02/22/07
Actually, they prove him right.  Logics | 02/21/07
Put up or Shut!  ShadeTree | 02/22/07
Try running a REAL power-gobbling program...  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 02/21/07
Seriously...  KTLA | 02/20/07
64-bit  KTLA | 02/20/07
give your systems specs  doh123 | 02/21/07
All the wrong moves...  BitTwiddler | 02/20/07
Agreed that it is annoying...  IslandBoy_77 | 02/20/07
No.  KTLA | 02/20/07
Change motherboards?  KTLA | 02/20/07
AMD released it because they had it  WiredGuy | 02/20/07
Adrian is obviously not a 'real' writer!  nomorems | 02/20/07
Man, you need your eyes checked ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/20/07
huh?  Badgered | 02/20/07
Cut a deal  klumper | 02/20/07
AMD  Sowhatsupyouranus@... | 02/20/07
wow...  zoroaster | 02/20/07
Adrian Adrian Adrian...  Narg | 02/20/07
Go on then ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/20/07
Middle Ground  cyba | 02/20/07
Sweet spot  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 02/20/07
That would be true if the AMD's performance ...  ShadeTree | 02/20/07
Not even about the money savings  NonZealot | 02/20/07
AMD vs Intel.  woozoo | 02/20/07
Wink  klumper | 02/20/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More