On TV.com: 2009's Most PIRATED TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 11th, 2008

Windows 7 build 6956 performance test

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 7:08 am

Categories: On the test bench, Windows 7

Tags: 32-bit, Microsoft Windows 7, Performance, Microsoft Windows Vista, Score, CINEBENCH R10 Next, Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn), Operating Systems, Software

My Hardware 2.0 mailbag is brimming with Windows 7 related questions. The main question on everyone’s lips is the obvious one - How does Windows 7 stack up against Vista?

Important note: Before I go any further I feel I need to make a point, and make it clear. The build I’m testing of Windows 7 (build 6956) is a pre-beta build, and as a rule pre-beta builds aren’t known for their performance. That said, the performance of this build should give us a clue as to how the OS is coming along.

This test will pitch Windows 7 build 6956 32-bit against Windows Vista RTM 32-bit and Windows Vista SP1 32-bit.

Check out the Windows 7 build 6956 benchmark gallery

UPDATE: I’ve added Windows XP data to the data below. Check out this post for details.

The System

Here’s the spec of the system I used:

  • Phenom 9700 quad-core processor
  • ATI Radeon 3850 graphics card with 256MB RAM
  • ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe motherboard
  • 2GB (2 x 1GB) Corsair Dominator CM2X1024-8500C5D RAM
  • Western Digital Raptor 10,000RPM 150GB primary hard drive
  • Western Digital Caviar 7,200RPM 500GB secondary hard drive

Each system was fully patched with all patches available from Windows Update. 

Other noteworthy points:

  • No optimizations were carried out other than to process idle tasks and defrag the hard drive between each test. 
  • Windows Defender was left on for all tests. 
  • The Microsoft Windows Vista SP1 testing guidelines document was followed closely.

The Tests

For this test we’re going to use one real life test and three synthetic benchmarks:

  • Boot-up time
  • PassMark PerformanceTest
  • PCMark Vantage
  • CINEBENCH R10

Next –>

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 178 Talkback(s)
You're missing the point...
People tend to upgrade or change because they are
being told to do so. If you have, say a P3 900MHz
system that runs fine with XP and start seeing all the
ads about how "wonderful" Mojave/... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Spuddrok Posted on: 12/24/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Windows 7 will rule  shellcodes_coder | 12/11/08
The reason Adrian tested x86  Alan Burns | 12/11/08
Actually ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/11/08
Who would complain?  Bozzer | 12/11/08
Obviously  rtk | 12/11/08
I want IA64 tests!!!  ShadowGIATL | 12/12/08
OF COURSE they would, because  LegendsOfBatman | 12/13/08
Rock solid and groundbreaking ... LOL  fr0thy2 | 12/11/08
Get an Xbox to Play Games and Dump Windows  chessmen | 12/12/08
Better yet, get a PlayStation.  fr0thy2 | 12/12/08
I'll have to agree  LegendsOfBatman | 12/13/08
LOL  shellcodes_coder | 12/13/08
Good for you....  todbran@... | 12/18/08
"Windows 7 will rule"  todbran@... | 12/18/08
anybody bench it on a netbook yet?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/11/08
Netbook? No one would want it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/11/08
wtf?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/11/08
ROFLOL (no text)  LegendsOfBatman | 12/13/08
ditto nt  T1Oracle | 12/14/08
No need for that  Mectron | 12/11/08
I've heard of that  AndyCee | 12/11/08
Aside from the ASUS N10...  Sleeper Service | 12/11/08
Grow the netbook to fit the bloatware. Good progress by MS.  fr0thy2 | 12/11/08
By your logic...  Wolfie2K3 | 12/12/08
LOL - fr0th and logic - now that's an Oxymoron -nt  USTechHead | 12/13/08
good question I spent a few weeks with the HP  tech_walker | 12/12/08
Atom based netbooks...  Narg | 12/12/08
Credit where credit is due  balsover | 12/12/08
A year ago, I might have agreed...  914four | 12/15/08
Add in Fusion + Spaces  homant@... | 12/15/08
Good idea  boed | 12/11/08
Sorry?  Sleeper Service | 12/11/08
No need to be Sorry  boed | 12/11/08
Vista runs just fine on a P4 1.6GHz system.  ye | 12/11/08
Please define...  914four | 12/15/08
I appreciate what you're saying but...  Sleeper Service | 12/11/08
Maybe where you live  boed | 12/11/08
Unless you're also their accountant  rtk | 12/11/08
RTK  boed | 12/11/08
Just for clarification  rtk | 12/11/08
Fair enough...  Sleeper Service | 12/11/08
In one abbreviation ...  thx-1138_@... | 12/12/08
Sorry...  Spuddrok | 12/24/08
re: anybody bench it on a netbook yet?  bdodson | 12/11/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  medezark@... | 12/11/08
The graphs provide this information. (nt)  ye | 12/11/08
You shouldnt even be doing these tests! TutTut  groovepoint@... | 12/11/08
It Proves Improvements...  clindhartsen | 12/11/08
I dont agree  groovepoint@... | 12/11/08
Then why did you bother reading it?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/11/08
Another post from NoAxe...  nizuse | 12/13/08
I disagree with your disagreement  boed | 12/11/08
I further disagree with your disagreement of the original disagreement.  rtk | 12/11/08
I agree with disagreeing about the disagreement of the disagreement.  Boomshiki | 12/13/08
Great Work...  Kromaethius | 12/11/08
Thoughts on a good benchmark test  boed | 12/11/08
Windows XP  boed | 12/11/08
he already did that  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/11/08
Yes he did do an XP comparison  boed | 12/11/08
as for Crysis - Vista/XP equal  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/11/08
Appreciated  boed | 12/11/08
I'm pretty sure  rtk | 12/11/08
Publish XP comparisons  dunmerbob | 12/11/08
been done  gnesterenko | 12/11/08
On activation.  rtk | 12/11/08
Care to eleborate.  Bozzer | 12/11/08
On DRM and broken windows explorer.  rtk | 12/11/08
"decrypting and storing the uncompressed bits"????  Zogg | 12/13/08
Thanks, but this is hardly a 'typical' home system  V@... | 12/11/08
Sure, not a typical system ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/11/08
Boot time  dprozzo | 12/11/08
Re: boot time  V@... | 12/11/08
Quad core is high end?  NonZealot | 12/11/08
Re: Quad core is high end?  V@... | 12/11/08
Hmmm  LegendsOfBatman | 12/13/08
It's NT Versioning.  V@... | 12/14/08
Correction.  ShadowGIATL | 12/15/08
My computer goes through a boot cycle daily  Dr_Zinj | 12/19/08
Boot time...  ShadowGIATL | 12/11/08
Re: designing OS for older hardware  V@... | 12/11/08
Generalizations  ShadowGIATL | 12/12/08
Re: Upgrading HW  V@... | 12/14/08
Umm...  ShadowGIATL | 12/15/08
You're missing the point...  Spuddrok | 12/24/08
several minutes, no, you have crapware  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/11/08
Re: Crapware  V@... | 12/11/08
Vista 64 is pretty quick  mswift@... | 12/12/08
XP64 Faster Still.  V@... | 12/14/08
Boot time doesn't matter much anymore...  Narg | 12/12/08
Re: Sleep & USB devices  V@... | 12/14/08
SP1 vs RTM?!  rseiler | 12/11/08
Vista pre beta comparison  s_souche | 12/11/08
I might ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/11/08
comparisons  PedroTabs | 12/12/08
Still won't change the fact that it sucks  Kaiwai | 12/11/08
according tio this 7 DOES what you ask  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/11/08
Bwaaaa everythings broken! Waaaaa  tonymcs@... | 12/11/08
For NZ$400 I expect no less than perfection!  Kaiwai | 12/11/08
Even for NZ$0, you'll never get perfection  rtk | 12/11/08
Silly boy...  Sleeper Service | 12/11/08
You're the moron  Kaiwai | 12/11/08
Still won't change the fact that you suck...  ShadowGIATL | 12/11/08
Yeah, no sense holding your breath.  rtk | 12/11/08
More idiots who don't listen  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
Site your source  ShadowGIATL | 12/12/08
You bloody moron  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
And your point is?  ShadowGIATL | 12/13/08
Son, there's a time to stop digging...  Sleeper Service | 12/11/08
An even bigger idiot!  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
Some free advice ...  thx-1138_@... | 12/12/08
Maybe you should take your own advice  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
Touch a nerve did I?  Sleeper Service | 12/14/08
MAJOR FAIL - Direct2D is in Win7!  de-void | 12/11/08
You bloody idiot  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
Maybe you should read.  ShadowGIATL | 12/12/08
I think its you who is completely broken...Talk about moronic...nt  transposeIT | 12/11/08
Another bloody idiot  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
Another bloody pompous ass  derek.werkowitz@... | 12/12/08
meh, it's like a game.  rtk | 12/12/08
Wrong again!  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
Somebody  dave01010101 | 12/12/08
Or...  Average-IT-Guy | 12/12/08
Test Microsoft for free  BALTHOR | 12/11/08
Actually ...  de-void | 12/11/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  boed | 12/11/08
Until Its Released Its All FUD  itanalyst2@... | 12/11/08
Longhorn was never released.  rtk | 12/11/08
You carry on believing whatever nonsense you want.  fr0thy2 | 12/11/08
Still sad still lost...all that anger - man bet your fun at parties -  USTechHead | 12/12/08
I smile as I write, mostly wink  fr0thy2 | 12/12/08
LOL - that's funny coming from your  USTechHead | 12/13/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  boed | 12/11/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  boed | 12/12/08
Oh darn - froth, donnie, and itanal are going  USTechHead | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  alf@... | 12/12/08
What about Linux?  cwallen19803@... | 12/12/08
Windows 7 vs. Linux  mjolnar@... | 12/12/08
Windows 7 vs Linux  GreyGeek77 | 12/13/08
re: What about Linux?  ahumeniy | 12/12/08
OS X's kernel is based on BSD  alaniane@... | 12/12/08
Well...  ShadowGIATL | 12/12/08
Benchmarking  willpd13 | 12/12/08
RE: Looks good however..  anthony_hunt | 12/12/08
RE: Looks good however..  kneufeld@... | 12/12/08
yes, but this benchmark is not for upgrades  PhilippeV | 12/12/08
Hardware Cost  Pembo | 12/12/08
RE: XP SP3 ?  AlterGeek | 12/12/08
How does XP to Windows 7 Migration Stack Up?  SteveMak | 12/12/08
Let's think in terms of irrlevant  rcfoulk@... | 12/12/08
Vista SP1 slows down Vista boot time lol  Randalllind | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  afalouth@... | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  afalouth@... | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  Eric.G | 12/12/08
Test results are irrelevant.  Spiritusindomit@... | 12/12/08
will optimized graphics drivers improve the cinebench scores for 7?  hansonjb | 12/12/08
optimized graphic drivers  krezol@... | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  seters | 12/12/08
Tests meaningless without XP, Linux  Wm.Franklin | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  Kenogami | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  codemonkey1 | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  the_bro | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  favs65@... | 12/12/08
Here is my evidence  Kaiwai | 12/12/08
Too bad, you still lose.  sjbinaz | 12/13/08
I want Zero Boot Time for starters  Donald.Nagy@... | 12/13/08
got your insta-boot right here  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/13/08
Uhhh  NStalnecker | 12/13/08
yes, but . .  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/13/08
RE: Why Are We...  The Rifleman | 12/13/08
Me too!  Ole Man | 12/20/08
sigh  billw1234 | 12/14/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  checkingher | 12/14/08
What happened to Originallity  checkingher | 12/14/08
I want programs to load and run in 0.2sec  Donald.Nagy@... | 12/14/08
Exactly - Same old c##p again  awake@... | 12/15/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  dmillerhsv@... | 12/18/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 performance test  kmpischke | 12/22/08
Vista in Sheeps clothing?  Theo49 | 12/22/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here