On TechRepublic: The 5 worst tech products of 2009
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 11th, 2008

Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 11:49 am

Categories: On the test bench

Tags: Microsoft Windows 7, SP3, Microsoft Windows, Operating Systems, Microsoft Windows XP, Software, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Special Report: Windows 7

Several of you have asked me to add data for Windows XP to my Windows 7 vs. Windows Vista benchmark post. Well, you asked for it!

Rather than build this into a large post, I’ll just post the data here. For any background check out the original post.

Bottom line: Windows 7 build 6956 beats Windows XP SP3 in each of the tests.

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 162 Talkback(s)
Reply to milly123
Sound like Hard Disk Failure.
That has recently happened to my XP HDD.
if I went over a certain size on the disk (All media setting and programs etc) my HDD will slow forget what it is writing, ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Scriptr Posted on: 01/02/10 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
RTM vs SP1  Donnie Bill | 12/11/08
Puzzling  rseiler | 12/11/08
Probably Not Better  Donnie Bill | 12/11/08
These performance differences...  Information_z | 12/23/08
To clarify ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/12/08
I See  Donnie Bill | 12/12/08
The way a boot time benchmark ought to work  Michael Kelly | 12/11/08
Alternative Characterisation of Your Idea  Donnie Bill | 12/11/08
Agreed  boed | 12/11/08
Boot-time timing  jbones39 | 12/13/08
I've found the same  LiquidLearner | 12/23/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  tburzio | 12/11/08
The same for Windows if you don't patch.  ye | 12/11/08
Kernel only  bryantrv | 12/11/08
No, not kernel only:  ye | 12/11/08
Yes, kernel only  bryantrv | 12/11/08
LOL! The denial is strong with this one!  ye | 12/11/08
Umm...  bryantrv | 12/11/08
Actually...  xsacha | 12/11/08
@bryantrv: Can't argue with fact so you attack the messenger.  ye | 12/12/08
@xsacha: I didn't say libc requires a restart. I said:  ye | 12/12/08
Dream worlds. Wouldn't it be nice.  ShadowGIATL | 12/15/08
In windows...  LiquidLearner | 12/23/08
Not Quite  Donnie Bill | 12/11/08
It was not tongue in cheek.  ye | 12/11/08
Limited experience  beatphreek | 12/12/08
Clarification  Donnie Bill | 12/12/08
Leaky applications don't require a restart of Windows.  ye | 12/12/08
Replied to Wrong Person  Donnie Bill | 12/12/08
I didn't reply to you. I replied to beatphreek. (nt)  ye | 12/12/08
This should be deleted. (nt)  ye | 12/12/08
It has been deleted...  rbrothers@... | 12/19/08
I had a Netware server...  914four | 12/15/08
Unlike Windows, many UNIX patches...  914four | 12/15/08
Many Windows patches don't require a reboot either.  ye | 12/15/08
I'd be interested in hearing from Windows users who...  914four | 12/15/08
From my experience  ShadowGIATL | 12/15/08
Don't get me wrong...  914four | 12/15/08
This is why I use Windows over ANY flavor of Linux...  zach.winchester | 12/17/08
Too few who can  Patanjali | 12/22/08
re: Many Patches Don't Require a Reboot Either  WarhavenSC | 12/16/08
ubuntu pretty fast too  PatrynXX | 12/12/08
Ubuntu vs Vista Boot Times  wolf_z | 12/15/08
I give you that.  ShadowGIATL | 12/15/08
Good News  jpr75_z | 12/11/08
Haha  NStalnecker | 12/11/08
Haha what?  bill@... | 12/11/08
I think you misunderstood me  NStalnecker | 12/11/08
While I don't disagree  merc2dogs` | 12/12/08
What you're missing  LiquidLearner | 12/23/08
I agree ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/12/08
...seconded.  Mitch 74 | 12/13/08
It's fixed  LiquidLearner | 12/23/08
The argument you're likely to hear...  Wolfie2K3 | 12/12/08
Yeah  NStalnecker | 12/12/08
With a bloated iTunes version just to reinforce it!  Patanjali | 12/22/08
Petition to save Vista!  de-void | 12/11/08
Ballmer will  boed | 12/11/08
re: Ballmer will  rtk | 12/11/08
What percentage of Leopard systems were downgraded?  914four | 12/15/08
Why is it a strange comment  rtk | 12/15/08
Reply to rtk  914four | 12/15/08
rtk doesn't use Apple  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 12/22/08
where's the fud?  rtk | 12/22/08
Whoosh...  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 12/22/08
Nope  rtk | 12/22/08
Hint for you  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 12/23/08
clueless troll  rtk | 12/23/08
What leg?  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 12/23/08
Wisdom  914four | 12/15/08
re: Ballmer will  pseudoperson | 12/23/08
Great post  LiquidLearner | 12/23/08
Maybe infoworld?  rtk | 12/11/08
Thanks for including XP  boed | 12/11/08
Some good questions  LiquidLearner | 12/23/08
Rebooting Linux vs Windows  pkzd | 12/11/08
You operate on ancient data  friedcow | 12/12/08
Visa makes computers?  914four | 12/15/08
Your title could be a little worthwhile if it were possible to edit posts  Patanjali | 12/22/08
I'm curious  isulzer | 12/11/08
Ah nvm.  isulzer | 12/11/08
Across Drives vs Across, Say, Processors  Donnie Bill | 12/11/08
It would only be more relevant  rtk | 12/11/08
well  isulzer | 12/12/08
unfortunately not.  rtk | 12/12/08
unfortunately I'm right.  isulzer | 12/12/08
Actually rtk IS right.  914four | 12/15/08
I think I understand why you're confused.  isulzer | 12/12/08
That's not unfortunate!  rtk | 12/12/08
You were not wrong,  914four | 12/15/08
Transfer rate is directly dependent upon rotation speed  Patanjali | 12/22/08
You have the ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/12/08
10K HDDs make a system seem snappier  Patanjali | 12/22/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  public@... | 12/11/08
well  isulzer | 12/11/08
True ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/12/08
My gawd.  rtk | 12/11/08
PICNIC ? Problem in Chair Not in Computer  Pembo | 12/12/08
Generally...  isulzer | 12/12/08
lol In days past....  sjbinaz | 12/12/08
Wait, Solaris breaks your rule...  914four | 12/15/08
Apple released a bloated iTunes that did slow down Windows  Patanjali | 12/22/08
That's great  shellcodes_coder | 12/11/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  xsacha | 12/11/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  yaffor | 12/11/08
Suspension of disbelief  disbelief | 12/12/08
Have you ever used Vista SP1 x86 or x64?  shellcodes_coder | 12/12/08
Test Probably OK  Donnie Bill | 12/12/08
"good tweaks"  rtk | 12/12/08
Lots More to Shut Off Than Just Aero  Donnie Bill | 12/12/08
turning off aero  grandadmiralmcb@... | 12/12/08
Jury Is Out  Donnie Bill | 12/12/08
Just make sure...  914four | 12/15/08
re:  NStalnecker | 12/12/08
The results are based on the data collected ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  ManBearPig | 12/12/08
PCMark Vantage on XP???  Randall C. Kennedy | 12/12/08
That chart ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/12/08
Wrong Data?  Randall C. Kennedy | 12/12/08
Don't forget XP Users like myself  karihouse | 12/12/08
Adrian. Integrated Graphics Test? Yes..No?  V@... | 12/12/08
Likely ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 12/12/08
Just The Beta  TBone2k | 12/12/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  Mrmpcebu59 | 12/12/08
Way Better?  Donnie Bill | 12/12/08
Thank you  oregonnerd13 | 12/12/08
Yo Adrian  nix_hed | 12/12/08
Why measure BOOT TIMES??????  MicroNix | 12/13/08
See Above Too  Donnie Bill | 12/13/08
Agreed  MicroNix | 12/14/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  Prixsel | 12/13/08
so Vista isn't such a slow pig and 7 is even better!  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/14/08
how accurate and consistent are OS benchmarks?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/15/08
Good post  914four | 12/15/08
Highlight the importance of accuracy, not quality  Patanjali | 12/22/08
Vista 64 Bit boots in 35 sec  PCWizKid | 12/15/08
Interesting wizkid I noticed your post on ready boost  tech_walker | 12/22/08
Bottom Line expanded.  magallanes | 12/15/08
not in this test  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/16/08
ignore, delete please  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/16/08
Pointless  MicroNix | 12/16/08
last cry of XP luddite  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/17/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  bellyfuz | 12/16/08
XP User for life !  rtirman37@... | 12/18/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  spark555 | 12/18/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  Budster1 | 12/19/08
Windows 7 build 6956 vs Vista SP2?  SMFX_ | 12/19/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  gsaggnws@... | 12/19/08
Definitely good news  davidr69 | 12/22/08
Why Adrian?  Narg | 12/22/08
why PC enthusiasts are avoiding vista, and waiting for Windows 7  ~doolittle~ | 12/22/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  TheMasterTech | 12/22/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  JakeZ | 12/22/08
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  muehlbauer | 12/22/08
What noone has a copy of 3DMark06?????  ghot@... | 01/01/09
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  milly123 | 07/03/09
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  markedaxe | 10/18/09
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  caixamagica | 11/11/09
XP Vs. 7 -Read Me.  Scriptr | 01/02/10
RE: Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3  Scriptr | 01/02/10
Save Vista - I wouldn't.  Scriptr | 01/02/10
Reply to milly123  Scriptr | 01/02/10

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads