On CHOW: How to avoid dirty looks at cafes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 5th, 2009

Apple and Psystar file joint motion to enter Stipulated Protective Order

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 8:16 am

Categories: Legal

Tags: Apple Inc., Intellectual Property, Research & Development, Business Operations, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

On February 26 2009, Apple and Psystar requested that the Court allow them to enter a Stipulated Protective Order. Since some of you have asked me what this means, let me take the opportunity to explain what this means.

What a Stipulated Protective Order does is that it allows the parties to guard against the disclosure of trade secrets (including, but not limited to software code). The stipulation extends to deposition testimony and summaries of protected information that are filed with Court. This means that this material will either be sealed by the court (in which case we won’t see it), or redacted if that is possible.

Oh, and before anyone starts making tinfoil hat claims as to why this order was made, this sort of thing is perfectly normal in cases that touch on intellectual property. What’s more, this requests was made by both sides, so it’s clear that both Apple and Psystar have information they don’t want to see out in the public domain.

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)
On the other hand...
If I were to infringe on Apple's (or anyone else's) copyrights and then, be sued for it, what better way to seem like a large, legitimate company than to enter this agreement. Just by doing that, Psystar has us wondering what they have, even though it is probably nil.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: TimmyB Posted on: 03/06/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Apple might have something to hide, but Psystar?  Scrat | 03/05/09
You've a point ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 03/06/09
On the other hand...  TimmyB | 03/06/09
Makes it hard to run a jury trial, that way  John L. Ries | 03/05/09
Cases like that ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 03/06/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here