Although I'm not a fan of pre-release comparisons...
Sleeper Service | 03/10/09
|

Tell the applications vendors
terry flores | 03/10/09
|
 
Many apps don't NEED to be 64-bit
de-void | 03/10/09
|
  
Yes they do need to be 64 bit
library assistant | 03/10/09
|
   
not my experience...
kathygnome | 03/10/09
|
   
32 bit apps run fine in 64 bit windows
DevGuy_z | 03/10/09
|
    
Really?
jasonp@... | 03/11/09
|
     
what do you call an "app"
whallify | 03/11/09
|
     
change that to MOST 32 bit apps work fine
tech_walker | 03/11/09
|
     
Of course they do...
jasonp@... | 03/11/09
|
     
Sorry but you didnt load it properly...
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
     
Several aps install a basic version of SQL
Dr. John | 03/11/09
|
     
And whose fault...
fairportfan | 03/11/09
|
     
64 bit now
mjolnar@... | 03/11/09
|
     
That's interesting. Because my SQL stuff works fine in 64 bit.
CobraA1 | 03/11/09
|
    
Not only 32 bit but older games ran fine too
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
   
DEAD WRONG!
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
|
    
eggman, of course, u're right !
Sheafferer | 04/19/09
|
   
If the software is well written
windozefreak | 03/10/09
|
   
Vista 32bit and XP Pro downgrade
Miss Wiggly | 03/11/09
|
   
64 bit
Budster1 | 03/11/09
|
   
Consider yourself unlucky.
CobraA1 | 03/11/09
|
  
64 bit also provides additional registers.
ye | 03/11/09
|
   
Thank You
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
  
A quick question about 64 vs 32
rwpank | 03/27/09
|
 
The you may want to change vendors.
Sleeper Service | 03/10/09
|
 
64 bit is only memory data is 256 bits
bklooste | 03/15/09
|

Very few Atom's are 64-bit though
Joe_Raby | 03/10/09
|
Correction Needed(Table): Vista Build 7048?
Gnutella | 03/10/09
|

Fixed!
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes | 03/10/09
|
 
XP SP3 But why?
rtirman37@... | 03/11/09
|
My Vista Exploded ! XP SP2 survivor...........
rtirman37@... | 03/10/09
|

Eh?
Sleeper Service | 03/10/09
|

What... the... F...? (nt)
tikigawd | 03/11/09
|
 
what he meant
jdieter@... | 03/11/09
|

You are a comlete noob....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|

Huh?
fairportfan | 03/11/09
|

????
medezark@... | 03/12/09
|

Finally!
Badgered | 03/13/09
|
The take-away is that there will be a rapid migration to Windows 7, as XP
DonnieBoy | 03/10/09
|

Adoption more than migration...
bdlang@... | 03/10/09
|
 
Microsoft's biggest upgrade ever?
de-void | 03/10/09
|
  
I agree
914four | 03/10/09
|

Windoze
mccoyjw@... | 03/10/09
|

Donnie... Is that you?
LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
|
 
I had to read it twice...nt
USTechHead | 03/11/09
|
The Unsung Hero
mikefarinha | 03/10/09
|

true
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
|
 
Vista is faster but...
Keywalker4God | 03/10/09
|
  
not the latest complaint
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
|
   
What irked me...
914four | 03/10/09
|
    
Their new software has always depended on faster hardware.
deowll | 03/10/09
|
    
Couple things
LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
|
  
aparently you dont know how to use a computer.
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
   
He knows...
914four | 03/12/09
|
 
Vista was slower...
914four | 03/10/09
|
  
The date has changed
mikefarinha | 03/10/09
|
   
Perhaps, but...
914four | 03/10/09
|
    
Well... now Win7 is faster than XP
mikefarinha | 03/10/09
|
     
I think the point is that Vista wasn't ready to be released when it was...
914four | 03/11/09
|
   
Tehy only complain so people can see how stupid they where.
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
    
IMHO, the reason most people complain...
914four | 03/12/09
|
     
Can we hear an "A-Men"?
rghubbard | 03/13/09
|
  
still out there
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
|
   
The problem with blogs especially Tech blogs...
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
    
The only reason I'm not mentioning spelling...
rghubbard | 03/13/09
|

what is boils down to
krikus | 03/11/09
|

I must say...I agree...but....
storm14k | 03/11/09
|
 
Good post
914four | 03/12/09
|
 
Let me get this strait
mikefarinha | 03/12/09
|
  
I don't think that's fair.
914four | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
matrixunloaded | 03/10/09
|

Dream on!
MSFTWorshipper | 03/10/09
|
 
You're right.
914four | 03/10/09
|
  
Cheapest solution?
LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
|
   
I wasn't aware...
914four | 03/11/09
|
    
No it does not
rparker009 | 03/11/09
|
     
The cost does disappear...
914four | 03/11/09
|
  
thin clients
harrisharris | 03/11/09
|
   
this appears to be the trend
Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
|
 
old argument
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
  
Sorry wrong again.....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
   
read my comment
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
    
re: comment
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
     
faults
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
    
Wrong again...
MSFTWorshipper | 03/11/09
|
     
Power Users?
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
   
I have an Eee PC...
914four | 03/12/09
|
 
Is It?
DannyO_0x98 | 03/11/09
|

Ubuntu, et al
toml_12953 | 03/11/09
|
 
I'm curious...
storm14k | 03/11/09
|
  
not curious just confused...
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
   
advances in Linux
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
    
I use it now
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
     
still spreading FUD
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
   
How is this?
mjolnar@... | 03/11/09
|
    
What is this newer better OS you are talking about?
914four | 03/12/09
|
 
Why downgrade to ubuntu anyway
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
  
more FUD
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
   
this from the FUD master himself
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
    
haven't shown you have any
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
  
Yep
plovelace@... | 03/11/09
|
  
The last benchmark I read, Ubuntu outperformed Fedora 10...
HypnoToad | 03/13/09
|
 
lock-in
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
  
Are you takin about yourself?
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
   
FUD
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
    
nothin to get over
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
     
systems
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
    
FUD?
plovelace@... | 03/11/09
|
     
my response
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
 
And buying Windows ____ or Office ____ is.
HypnoToad | 03/13/09
|
 
Re: Ubuntu, et al
nibblesnbits | 03/14/09
|

Linux couldnt compete....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
 
prove it
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
  
stop wastin my time
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
   
again, read the comment
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
    
Assuming he knows how to read.
HypnoToad | 03/13/09
|
 
Ubuntu is not a fast build of linux
Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
|
  
speed tests
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
   
I have to agree but...
Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
|
    
Agreed
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
  
I agree....but aren't we talking about desktops here?
storm14k | 03/11/09
|
   
we are talking about benchmark tests ..
Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
|
 
OK. I've watched you
daengbo | 03/12/09
|
 
rbslack...
914four | 03/12/09
|

The results are encouraging
masinick@... | 03/13/09
|
Gee, and my preferred MS OS isn't on the list anymore.
Dr_Zinj | 03/10/09
|

Bingo!
wkulecz | 03/11/09
|
 
Yep
mike21b@... | 03/11/09
|

. . . .and not supported anymore . . .
CobraA1 | 03/12/09
|
I'm suspicious
johnnydoe1894 | 03/10/09
|

Im Suspicious
j0sh8503 | 03/10/09
|

I've never seen XP install faster than Vista
tech_walker | 03/10/09
|
 
of all three XP is the SLOWEST, by far
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
|
  
Not always...
914four | 03/10/09
|
   
Not true....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
    
I call BS.
914four | 03/12/09
|
 
"...never seen XP install faster than Vista"
whitesfyre | 03/10/09
|
 
Why not quit bein cheap...
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|

How much...
914four | 03/10/09
|

The main problem is user head space...
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
 
Perhaps you could enlighten us...
914four | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
steve@... | 03/10/09
|

you need to
Azathothh | 03/11/09
|

Ignorance breeds stupidity...
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Slim_C | 03/10/09
|

I did....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|

No Microsoft OS is perfect. But XP is at least usable.
No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 03/13/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
ve1alq@... | 03/10/09
|

examples?
rtk | 03/10/09
|
 
64 bit
Average-IT-Guy | 03/11/09
|

then its time to get a real design app.
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
 
the word is "were"
sjbinaz | 03/14/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
ve1alq@... | 03/10/09
|

once again....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|

once again....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
lektrikpuke@... | 03/10/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Maurizio Albera | 03/10/09
|

you see UAC once
Azathothh | 03/11/09
|

ok lettin you know an a e2000 system running 1GB
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
 
It sounds to me...
914four | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Nookhoek | 03/10/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Nookhoek | 03/10/09
|

It's not about a single package
LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
|

theres a big differance....
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
Why you didn't test the Vista SP2 RC ?
qmlscycrajg | 03/10/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
richdave | 03/10/09
|

Linux doesn't have a larger user base than OS X
LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
|
 
While I rarely find myself agreeing with LL, he's right...
914four | 03/10/09
|
 
RE:Linux doesn't have a larger user base than OS X
richdave | 03/10/09
|
  
Exactly my point
LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
|
   
RE:Exactly my point
richdave | 03/11/09
|
    
So you're saying
LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
|
     
RE:So you're saying
richdave | 03/12/09
|
     
On December 15th, 1999 I installed...
914four | 03/12/09
|
   
Actually you make the case for Linux very well.
storm14k | 03/11/09
|
   
Not really an argument
daengbo | 03/12/09
|
    
Well said!
914four | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance
levinson | 03/10/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
bblaho | 03/10/09
|
xp vx vista vs win7 in Sun xVM
pupkin_z | 03/10/09
|

What base OS are you running xVM on?
914four | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
tgardley | 03/10/09
|

RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance
richdave | 03/10/09
|
 
Should spend some time with 7
LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
|
  
to answer your question
krikus | 03/11/09
|
   
Thanks for the response
LiquidLearner | 03/11/09
|
  
Actually I have spent less time scouring forums with Linux...
storm14k | 03/11/09
|
   
You can stop lying now
LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
|
  
RE:Should spend some time with 7
richdave | 03/12/09
|
   
Totally agree
micmac888 | 03/13/09
|
 
Re - Linux
Average-IT-Guy | 03/11/09
|
  
Basically, what you'r e saying is ....
startx.jeff | 03/11/09
|
   
OMG!!!
James Quinn | 03/11/09
|
  
Nothing "just works".......
Ole Man | 03/11/09
|
  
funny
tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
|
 
not really
omnicronx | 03/11/09
|
  
I've installed proprietary drivers...
storm14k | 03/11/09
|
   
Same for Windows
LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
mrmel2you@... | 03/10/09
|
64-bit should be standard at this point
verelse | 03/10/09
|
no need to rush, wait for Win7 SP1
sinan99 | 03/11/09
|

only in business
omnicronx | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Disgruntled M$ User | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
questionmark | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Disgruntled M$ User | 03/11/09
|

dude
Azathothh | 03/11/09
|
 
I think it's less a hardware issue and more a user issue.... (nt)
Average-IT-Guy | 03/11/09
|
 
Re:Dude
Disgruntled M$ User | 03/12/09
|
  
your opinion is worthle$$
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/13/09
|

Maybe I should wake up and have about 3 LARGE cups of coffee?
GAXXIS | 03/11/09
|

DOS 3.5?
914four | 03/13/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
mreed@... | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance
wbenton0 | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
stdo57@... | 03/11/09
|
We need actual figures, not "ratings"
master811 | 03/11/09
|

What, and quit "journalism" ?? (NT)
Clockwork Computer | 03/11/09
|
Adrian, Subjective Rubbish !
Alan Smithie | 03/11/09
|

Unless Microsoft changes the EULA ...
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes | 03/11/09
|
 
Fair comment
Alan Smithie | 03/12/09
|
  
What an odd view of the world
LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
|
   
Not odd at all
Alan Smithie | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
rMatey | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Eldo@... | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
harrisharris | 03/11/09
|

whoops
harrisharris | 03/11/09
|
O_O
magallanes | 03/11/09
|

ram?
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
|

It should be fine.
CobraA1 | 03/12/09
|
my desktop is a terminal
jdieter@... | 03/11/09
|

intelligent ...
Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
|
Games
David@... | 03/11/09
|
Upgrade from XP to 7
kkruy@... | 03/11/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
rbslack@... | 03/11/09
|
Only the netbook and "emerging market" versions need a 32 bit option. nt
T1Oracle | 03/11/09
|

not quite correct
Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
|
 
Actually, that has nothing to do with how "true" 64 bit is.
CobraA1 | 03/12/09
|
This is just part of the problem.
davetracer@... | 03/11/09
|
Yes but will Windows 7 security exploits run faster than Vista ones?
whisperycat | 03/11/09
|

desperate?
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
|
Windows to be exploited faster, with new viruses
Christian_<>< | 03/11/09
|

here come the trolls
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
|
 
Fact
sir4taye@... | 03/11/09
|
  
sorry dude
eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
|
  
Facts
honeymonster | 03/11/09
|
   
Really?
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 03/12/09
|
People are being cheated
jabailo1 | 03/11/09
|
Same old cold base (paid advertisements)
Christian_<>< | 03/11/09
|
Wow.
dreslough | 03/11/09
|

It's just Hype
Badgered | 03/13/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance
DannyO_0x98 | 03/11/09
|
Will Windows 7 be able to run safety critical applications?
whisperycat | 03/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
lvr181 | 03/12/09
|
So basically, it's twice as fast?
Narg | 03/12/09
|
Computers get quicker and Windows slows down?
artistscope | 03/13/09
|
I'm Not Buying the Results
mandms7 | 03/13/09
|

re: I'm Not Buying the Results
Badgered | 03/13/09
|
Why buy Win-7 if you're HrdWare won't load?
fvm | 03/13/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance
baudie | 03/13/09
|
what about User Friendly ?
baudie | 03/13/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
JRobert345 | 03/13/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
atari8bit@... | 03/14/09
|

Not minwin
rampantandroid | 03/14/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
SteeLx | 03/14/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
jimdrvr99@... | 03/14/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
atari8bit@... | 03/14/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
davesbull | 03/15/09
|
Against EULA?
computer_freak_8 | 03/16/09
|
Vista 64 bit test.
glenn.seaton@... | 03/17/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
hantoyo1@... | 03/18/09
|
I stay with XP
dimitri.aguero@... | 03/18/09
|

Give it a year
hynesy_dave@... | 03/27/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance
arb773@... | 03/24/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
andrew whitelock | 04/02/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
ajboesch71@... | 04/04/09
|
64 bit vs 32 bit?
john.foggitt@... | 04/07/09
|
I like Vista
cole.parker | 04/12/09
|
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?
Lemuelpn@... | 04/12/09
|