On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 10th, 2009

Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 5:41 am

Categories: On the test bench, Windows 7

Tags: Microsoft Windows 7, Performance, Microsoft Windows XP, Operating System, built-In, Microsoft Windows Vista, ISO, Beta, Microsoft Windows, Iso standards

The test systems

I’ve used two desktop systems as the test machines:

  • An AMD Phenom 9700 2.4GHz system fitted with an ATI Radeon 3850 and 4GB of RAM
  • An Intel Pentium Dual Core E2200 2.2GHz fitted with an NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS and 1GB of RAM

The tests

There are 31 tests in all, most of which are self explanatory:

  1. Install OS - Time it takes to install the OS
  2. Boot up - Average boot time to usable desktop
  3. Shut down - Average shut down time
  4. Move 100MB files - Move 100MB of JPEG files from one hard drive to another
  5. Move 2.5GB files - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from one hard drive to another
  6. Network transfer 100MB files - Move 100MB of JPEG files from test machine to NAS device
  7. Network transfer 2.5GB files - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from test machine to NAS device
  8. Move 100MB files under load - Move 100MB of JPEG files from one hard drive to another while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  9. Move 2.5GB files under load - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from one hard drive to another while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  10. Network transfer 100MB files under load - Move 100MB of JPEG files from test machine to NAS device while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  11. Network transfer 2.5GB files under load - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from test machine to NAS device while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  12. Compress 100MB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
  13. Compress 1GB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
  14. Extract 100MB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
  15. Extract 1GB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
  16. Compress 100MB files under load - Using built-in ZIP compression while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  17. Compress 1GB files under load - Using built-in ZIP compression while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  18. Extract 100MB files under load - Using built-in ZIP compression while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  19. Extract 1GB files under load - Using built-in ZIP compression while ripping DVD to .ISO file
  20. Install Office 2007 - Ultimate version, from DVD
  21. Open 10 page Word doc - Text only
  22. Open 100 page Word doc - Text and images only
  23. Open simple Excel doc - Basic formatting
  24. Open complex Excel doc - Including formula and charts
  25. Burn DVD - Win 7 beta 1 .ISO to disc using CDBurnerXP
  26. Open 10 page PDF - Text only, using latest Adobe Reader 8
  27. Open 100 page PDF - Text and images, using latest Adobe Reader 8
  28. Far Cry 2 benchmark
  29. Call of Duty 5 benchmark
  30. Left 4 Dead benchmark
  31. Crysis Warhead benchmark

These series of tests will pitch Windows 7 build 7048 and 7000 32/64-bit against Windows Vista SP1 32-bit and Windows XP SP3 32-bit. The scoring for each of the tests is simple. The winning OS scores 1, the runner ups 2, 3 and 4 respectively and the loser scores a 5. The scores are added up and the OS with the lowest score at the end wins.

Let’s check out the results …

Next –>

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 278 Talkback(s)
eggman, of course, u're right !
*****32 bit apps run fine under 64 bit - there is no 64 bit upgrade for MS office******

(Read the rest)
Posted by: Sheafferer Posted on: 04/19/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Although I'm not a fan of pre-release comparisons...  Sleeper Service | 03/10/09
Tell the applications vendors  terry flores | 03/10/09
Many apps don't NEED to be 64-bit  de-void | 03/10/09
Yes they do need to be 64 bit  library assistant | 03/10/09
not my experience...  kathygnome | 03/10/09
32 bit apps run fine in 64 bit windows  DevGuy_z | 03/10/09
Really?  jasonp@... | 03/11/09
what do you call an "app"  whallify | 03/11/09
change that to MOST 32 bit apps work fine  tech_walker | 03/11/09
Of course they do...  jasonp@... | 03/11/09
Sorry but you didnt load it properly...  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
Several aps install a basic version of SQL  Dr. John | 03/11/09
And whose fault...  fairportfan | 03/11/09
64 bit now  mjolnar@... | 03/11/09
That's interesting. Because my SQL stuff works fine in 64 bit.  CobraA1 | 03/11/09
Not only 32 bit but older games ran fine too  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
DEAD WRONG!  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
eggman, of course, u're right !  Sheafferer | 04/19/09
If the software is well written  windozefreak | 03/10/09
Vista 32bit and XP Pro downgrade  Miss Wiggly | 03/11/09
64 bit  Budster1 | 03/11/09
Consider yourself unlucky.  CobraA1 | 03/11/09
64 bit also provides additional registers.  ye | 03/11/09
Thank You  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
A quick question about 64 vs 32  rwpank | 03/27/09
The you may want to change vendors.  Sleeper Service | 03/10/09
64 bit is only memory data is 256 bits  bklooste | 03/15/09
Very few Atom's are 64-bit though  Joe_Raby | 03/10/09
Correction Needed(Table): Vista Build 7048?  Gnutella | 03/10/09
Fixed!  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 03/10/09
XP SP3 But why?  rtirman37@... | 03/11/09
My Vista Exploded ! XP SP2 survivor...........  rtirman37@... | 03/10/09
Eh?  Sleeper Service | 03/10/09
What... the... F...? (nt)  tikigawd | 03/11/09
what he meant  jdieter@... | 03/11/09
You are a comlete noob....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
Huh?  fairportfan | 03/11/09
????  medezark@... | 03/12/09
Finally!  Badgered | 03/13/09
The take-away is that there will be a rapid migration to Windows 7, as XP  DonnieBoy | 03/10/09
Adoption more than migration...  bdlang@... | 03/10/09
Microsoft's biggest upgrade ever?  de-void | 03/10/09
I agree  914four | 03/10/09
Windoze  mccoyjw@... | 03/10/09
Donnie... Is that you?  LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
I had to read it twice...nt  USTechHead | 03/11/09
The Unsung Hero  mikefarinha | 03/10/09
true  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
Vista is faster but...  Keywalker4God | 03/10/09
not the latest complaint  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
What irked me...  914four | 03/10/09
Their new software has always depended on faster hardware.  deowll | 03/10/09
Couple things  LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
aparently you dont know how to use a computer.  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
He knows...  914four | 03/12/09
Vista was slower...  914four | 03/10/09
The date has changed  mikefarinha | 03/10/09
Perhaps, but...  914four | 03/10/09
Well... now Win7 is faster than XP  mikefarinha | 03/10/09
I think the point is that Vista wasn't ready to be released when it was...  914four | 03/11/09
Tehy only complain so people can see how stupid they where.  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
IMHO, the reason most people complain...  914four | 03/12/09
Can we hear an "A-Men"?  rghubbard | 03/13/09
still out there  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
The problem with blogs especially Tech blogs...  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
The only reason I'm not mentioning spelling...  rghubbard | 03/13/09
what is boils down to  krikus | 03/11/09
I must say...I agree...but....  storm14k | 03/11/09
Good post  914four | 03/12/09
Let me get this strait  mikefarinha | 03/12/09
I don't think that's fair.  914four | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  matrixunloaded | 03/10/09
Dream on!  MSFTWorshipper | 03/10/09
You're right.  914four | 03/10/09
Cheapest solution?  LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
I wasn't aware...  914four | 03/11/09
No it does not  rparker009 | 03/11/09
The cost does disappear...  914four | 03/11/09
thin clients  harrisharris | 03/11/09
this appears to be the trend  Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
old argument  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
Sorry wrong again.....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
read my comment  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
re: comment  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
faults  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
Wrong again...  MSFTWorshipper | 03/11/09
Power Users?  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
I have an Eee PC...  914four | 03/12/09
Is It?  DannyO_0x98 | 03/11/09
Ubuntu, et al  toml_12953 | 03/11/09
I'm curious...  storm14k | 03/11/09
not curious just confused...  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
advances in Linux  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
I use it now  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
still spreading FUD  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
How is this?  mjolnar@... | 03/11/09
What is this newer better OS you are talking about?  914four | 03/12/09
Why downgrade to ubuntu anyway  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
more FUD  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
this from the FUD master himself  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
haven't shown you have any  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
Yep  plovelace@... | 03/11/09
The last benchmark I read, Ubuntu outperformed Fedora 10...  HypnoToad | 03/13/09
lock-in  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
Are you takin about yourself?  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
FUD  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
nothin to get over  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
systems  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
FUD?  plovelace@... | 03/11/09
my response  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
And buying Windows ____ or Office ____ is.  HypnoToad | 03/13/09
Re: Ubuntu, et al  nibblesnbits | 03/14/09
Linux couldnt compete....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
prove it  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
stop wastin my time  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
again, read the comment  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
Assuming he knows how to read.  HypnoToad | 03/13/09
Ubuntu is not a fast build of linux  Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
speed tests  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
I have to agree but...  Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
Agreed  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
I agree....but aren't we talking about desktops here?  storm14k | 03/11/09
we are talking about benchmark tests ..  Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
OK. I've watched you  daengbo | 03/12/09
rbslack...  914four | 03/12/09
The results are encouraging  masinick@... | 03/13/09
Gee, and my preferred MS OS isn't on the list anymore.  Dr_Zinj | 03/10/09
Bingo!  wkulecz | 03/11/09
Yep  mike21b@... | 03/11/09
. . . .and not supported anymore . . .  CobraA1 | 03/12/09
I'm suspicious  johnnydoe1894 | 03/10/09
Im Suspicious  j0sh8503 | 03/10/09
I've never seen XP install faster than Vista  tech_walker | 03/10/09
of all three XP is the SLOWEST, by far  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/10/09
Not always...  914four | 03/10/09
Not true....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
I call BS.  914four | 03/12/09
"...never seen XP install faster than Vista"  whitesfyre | 03/10/09
Why not quit bein cheap...  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
How much...  914four | 03/10/09
The main problem is user head space...  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
Perhaps you could enlighten us...  914four | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  steve@... | 03/10/09
you need to  Azathothh | 03/11/09
Ignorance breeds stupidity...  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Slim_C | 03/10/09
I did....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
No Microsoft OS is perfect. But XP is at least usable.  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 03/13/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  ve1alq@... | 03/10/09
examples?  rtk | 03/10/09
64 bit  Average-IT-Guy | 03/11/09
then its time to get a real design app.  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
the word is "were"  sjbinaz | 03/14/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  ve1alq@... | 03/10/09
once again....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
once again....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  lektrikpuke@... | 03/10/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Maurizio Albera | 03/10/09
you see UAC once  Azathothh | 03/11/09
ok lettin you know an a e2000 system running 1GB  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
It sounds to me...  914four | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Nookhoek | 03/10/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Nookhoek | 03/10/09
It's not about a single package  LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
theres a big differance....  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
Why you didn't test the Vista SP2 RC ?  qmlscycrajg | 03/10/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  richdave | 03/10/09
Linux doesn't have a larger user base than OS X  LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
While I rarely find myself agreeing with LL, he's right...  914four | 03/10/09
RE:Linux doesn't have a larger user base than OS X  richdave | 03/10/09
Exactly my point  LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
RE:Exactly my point  richdave | 03/11/09
So you're saying  LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
RE:So you're saying  richdave | 03/12/09
On December 15th, 1999 I installed...  914four | 03/12/09
Actually you make the case for Linux very well.  storm14k | 03/11/09
Not really an argument  daengbo | 03/12/09
Well said!  914four | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance  levinson | 03/10/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  bblaho | 03/10/09
xp vx vista vs win7 in Sun xVM  pupkin_z | 03/10/09
What base OS are you running xVM on?  914four | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  tgardley | 03/10/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance  richdave | 03/10/09
Should spend some time with 7  LiquidLearner | 03/10/09
to answer your question  krikus | 03/11/09
Thanks for the response  LiquidLearner | 03/11/09
Actually I have spent less time scouring forums with Linux...  storm14k | 03/11/09
You can stop lying now  LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
RE:Should spend some time with 7  richdave | 03/12/09
Totally agree  micmac888 | 03/13/09
Re - Linux  Average-IT-Guy | 03/11/09
Basically, what you'r e saying is ....  startx.jeff | 03/11/09
OMG!!!  James Quinn | 03/11/09
Nothing "just works".......  Ole Man | 03/11/09
funny  tmsbrdrs | 03/11/09
not really  omnicronx | 03/11/09
I've installed proprietary drivers...  storm14k | 03/11/09
Same for Windows  LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  mrmel2you@... | 03/10/09
64-bit should be standard at this point  verelse | 03/10/09
no need to rush, wait for Win7 SP1  sinan99 | 03/11/09
only in business  omnicronx | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Disgruntled M$ User | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  questionmark | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Disgruntled M$ User | 03/11/09
dude  Azathothh | 03/11/09
I think it's less a hardware issue and more a user issue.... (nt)  Average-IT-Guy | 03/11/09
Re:Dude  Disgruntled M$ User | 03/12/09
your opinion is worthle$$  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/13/09
Maybe I should wake up and have about 3 LARGE cups of coffee?  GAXXIS | 03/11/09
DOS 3.5?  914four | 03/13/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  mreed@... | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance  wbenton0 | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  stdo57@... | 03/11/09
We need actual figures, not "ratings"  master811 | 03/11/09
What, and quit "journalism" ?? (NT)  Clockwork Computer | 03/11/09
Adrian, Subjective Rubbish !  Alan Smithie | 03/11/09
Unless Microsoft changes the EULA ...  Adrian Kingsley-HughesZDNet Moderator | 03/11/09
Fair comment  Alan Smithie | 03/12/09
What an odd view of the world  LiquidLearner | 03/12/09
Not odd at all  Alan Smithie | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  rMatey | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Eldo@... | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  harrisharris | 03/11/09
whoops  harrisharris | 03/11/09
O_O  magallanes | 03/11/09
ram?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
It should be fine.  CobraA1 | 03/12/09
my desktop is a terminal  jdieter@... | 03/11/09
intelligent ...  Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
Games  David@... | 03/11/09
Upgrade from XP to 7  kkruy@... | 03/11/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  rbslack@... | 03/11/09
Only the netbook and "emerging market" versions need a 32 bit option. nt  T1Oracle | 03/11/09
not quite correct  Aussie_linux_user | 03/11/09
Actually, that has nothing to do with how "true" 64 bit is.  CobraA1 | 03/12/09
This is just part of the problem.  davetracer@... | 03/11/09
Yes but will Windows 7 security exploits run faster than Vista ones?  whisperycat | 03/11/09
desperate?  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
Windows to be exploited faster, with new viruses wink  Christian_<>< | 03/11/09
here come the trolls  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
Fact  sir4taye@... | 03/11/09
sorry dude  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/11/09
Facts  honeymonster | 03/11/09
Really?  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 03/12/09
People are being cheated  jabailo1 | 03/11/09
Same old cold base (paid advertisements) sad  Christian_<>< | 03/11/09
Wow.  dreslough | 03/11/09
It's just Hype  Badgered | 03/13/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance  DannyO_0x98 | 03/11/09
Will Windows 7 be able to run safety critical applications?  whisperycat | 03/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  lvr181 | 03/12/09
So basically, it's twice as fast?  Narg | 03/12/09
Computers get quicker and Windows slows down?  artistscope | 03/13/09
I'm Not Buying the Results  mandms7 | 03/13/09
re: I'm Not Buying the Results  Badgered | 03/13/09
Why buy Win-7 if you're HrdWare won't load?  fvm | 03/13/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance  baudie | 03/13/09
what about User Friendly ?  baudie | 03/13/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  JRobert345 | 03/13/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  atari8bit@... | 03/14/09
Not minwin  rampantandroid | 03/14/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  SteeLx | 03/14/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  jimdrvr99@... | 03/14/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  atari8bit@... | 03/14/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  davesbull | 03/15/09
Against EULA?  computer_freak_8 | 03/16/09
Vista 64 bit test.  glenn.seaton@... | 03/17/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  hantoyo1@... | 03/18/09
I stay with XP  dimitri.aguero@... | 03/18/09
Give it a year  hynesy_dave@... | 03/27/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance  arb773@... | 03/24/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  andrew whitelock | 04/02/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  ajboesch71@... | 04/04/09
64 bit vs 32 bit?  john.foggitt@... | 04/07/09
I like Vista  cole.parker | 04/12/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?  Lemuelpn@... | 04/12/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here