On mySimon: Fisher Price Grow With Me Trike
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 16th, 2009

Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 6:14 am

Categories: Microsoft, On the test bench, Windows 7

Tags: 32-bit, Microsoft Windows 7, Performance, Microsoft Windows XP, Operating System, built-In, Microsoft Windows Vista, ISO, Release Candidate, Microsoft Windows

Over the weekend I’ve been spending time with the latest leaked build of Windows 7 - build 7057. While this isn’t the release candidate (RC) build that some people claim it is, this build is certainly pretty close to being RC.

How can I tell that we’re close to seeing an RC build? Well, mostly it’s a gut feeling based on the fact that features-wise Windows 7 has been finished for a long time and that now Microsoft seems to be at the stage of adding new wallpapers, tweaking default account pictures, and generally polishing a few aspects of the UI. However, I don’t want to underestimate the importance of getting a look at this build, because it’s the first 32-bit build I’ve seen since the beta 1 release (which was released back in January, but had a build date going back to December 08). Only the 64-bit flavor of build 7048 emerged earlier this month. Build 7057 also the freshest build - the build date stamp, 090305-2000 translates into 5th Mar 2009, 8:00pm - so this is literally just over a week old.

Check out the Windows 7 build 7057 gallery!

Rather than give you a blow-by-blow account of everything that’s different about this build compared to every previous build that we’ve seen (I’ll leave that to others), I’m going to concentrate on the one area that interests me (and many of my readers) the most - performance.

Note: Before I go any further, I feel the need to emphasize that build 7057 is still a beta build and nothing can be taken as being final at this stage.

Important note: I have on several occasions contacted Microsoft for feedback on benchmarking Windows 7 and at this point the company is not ready to discuss performance testing.

Rather than publish a series of synthetic benchmark results for the different operating systems and builds (Microsoft frowns upon benchmarking beta builds, not to mention the fact that the final numbers only really matter for the release candidate and RTM builds), I’ve decided to put Windows 7, Vista and XP head-to-head in a series of real-world tests to find out which OS comes out top.

Let’s look at the test systems and the tests …

The tests –>

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 146 Talkback(s)
Realy?
What Hd were you using because that is quite slow.
My pc from a standard HD booted windows 7 in about 45 seconds including bios.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: jdbukis@... Posted on: 04/30/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Will you be able to post the actual times?  storm14k | 03/16/09
....  n0neXn0ne | 03/16/09
Actual times  daengbo | 03/17/09
Only true in limited cases  notsofast | 03/17/09
Better than Vista?  flboffin | 03/20/09
No Linux is Ready for Consumer Primetime  dkstrauss | 04/13/09
Realy?  jdbukis@... | 04/30/09
a lot of work, but...  Linux Geek | 03/16/09
Just curious  GuidingLight | 03/16/09
Nicely Put (NT)  safesax2002 | 03/16/09
he must be working for MS  eggmanbubbagee@... | 03/16/09
He's already killed his parents  jackbond | 03/16/09
re: murder by Linux  tmsbrdrs | 03/17/09
Re: deluded lintard  s32432432 | 03/16/09
Test againt Linux?? Why?  Stan57 | 03/16/09
Try 4%. Probably because...  914four | 03/17/09
4% of web developers looking to learn HTML  de-void | 03/17/09
I reread their description...  914four | 03/17/09
GNU/Linux has 10 percent of the desktop  pogson | 03/25/09
Linux is great why don't you talk about it  tech_walker | 03/17/09
You must be THICK  Richard Turpin | 03/17/09
Before you call someone thick  marks055@... | 03/17/09
What if .......  bentedgz | 03/17/09
LOL! You so funny!  Crestview | 03/17/09
Really?  notsofast | 03/17/09
a lot of work, but...  schuppe | 03/18/09
You must care linux geek  Aussie_Troll | 03/16/09
Why would he fear...  storm14k | 03/16/09
Fear?  Col Mustard | 03/17/09
Linux on Old Hardware == EPIC FAIL  PMC-CON | 03/24/09
GNU/Linux on Old Hardware Saves the Planet  pogson | 03/25/09
RE: You must care ... not to be accurate  n0neXn0ne | 03/16/09
Windows powers more than 90% of the Worlds computers.  ye | 03/16/09
My point ...  n0neXn0ne | 03/16/09
So you had no point. Why am I not surprised? (nt)  ye | 03/16/09
Windows powers more than 90% of the Worlds computers  GAXXIS | 03/17/09
*nix user civility  tmsbrdrs | 03/17/09
Civility  de-void | 03/17/09
very true  george.supreeth@... | 03/17/09
You should be more honest though  jdbukis@... | 03/21/09
I didn't say there are less  tmsbrdrs | 03/22/09
Civility and Arrogance Are Mutually Exclusive  PMC-CON | 03/24/09
Windows powers more than...  tmsbrdrs | 03/17/09
MS Scared? So They Improve Performance? In Response to Linux?  PMC-CON | 03/24/09
Because the Supercomputers outnumber desktops  safesax2002 | 03/16/09
RE: ... Supercomputers outnumber desktops  n0neXn0ne | 03/16/09
Ooohh...Good try  safesax2002 | 03/16/09
RE: Ooohh...Good try ...  n0neXn0ne | 03/16/09
Actually considering...  CrashPad | 03/16/09
Check this out:  914four | 03/17/09
better try  tmsbrdrs | 03/17/09
well  jdbukis@... | 03/21/09
That says nothing about windows  MissingMatter | 03/16/09
Doesn't matter....  storm14k | 03/16/09
85% of 500 90% of 1 billion  de-void | 03/16/09
Re: Linux Powers More then 85% of the World's Top 500 Supercomputers  Franciscus101 | 03/17/09
What? It's THAT much?  Crestview | 03/17/09
Waaaaaa, its not Linux  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/09
As Usual, You Have Nothing Constructive To Say  itanalyst2@... | 03/16/09
Irony.  Sleeper Service | 03/16/09
Well, wipe noses of Linux and Mac  Crestview | 03/17/09
Wipe your own, my Linux is doing fine  tmsbrdrs | 03/22/09
Learning Linux to Avoid costly upgrade  Zolar | 03/26/09
humph....  gunfrk@... | 03/25/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  shellcodes_coder | 03/16/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  shellcodes_coder | 03/16/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  Jim Doss | 03/16/09
Memory, Memory, Memory!  de-void | 03/16/09
Some real load is amiss... happy  Solid Water | 03/16/09
Adrian actually left all of these on!  de-void | 03/16/09
He meant running  LiquidLearner | 03/16/09
7057 Likes and Dislikes  jpr75_z | 03/16/09
"please even the Windows naysayers"?  RocketEater | 03/16/09
Only Him  fcdenton666 | 03/16/09
I was thinking the same thing...  storm14k | 03/16/09
Hey folk can dislike it if they want....  Sleeper Service | 03/16/09
It only makes a better product....  storm14k | 03/16/09
Erm ... you do know Bill's "left the building", right?  de-void | 03/16/09
Blasting past Vista  Chad_z | 03/16/09
Yeah, I know  fcdenton666 | 03/16/09
Apples to apples not to your liking?  itpro_z | 03/16/09
Ah, the spin  frgough | 03/17/09
For once...  Badgered | 03/17/09
I used it when I was working for LTSB  jdbukis@... | 03/21/09
WoW that was purile  jdbukis@... | 03/21/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  athaki | 03/16/09
Can't See Machines On My Network On 7057  itanalyst2@... | 03/16/09
Same issue here: No network computers visible in 7057  dwight.silverman@... | 03/16/09
Thank Goodness!! I Thought It Was Just Me!  itanalyst2@... | 03/16/09
Pretty sure Vista will support it  LiquidLearner | 03/16/09
home network  higgielk1@... | 03/17/09
homegroup  FLCAPT@... | 03/18/09
Just Confirmed It  itanalyst2@... | 03/18/09
XP Addon available  ederkley | 03/22/09
Neither  shane@... | 03/27/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previ  Patrick O'Bryan Jr. | 03/16/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previ  Xanthus179 | 03/17/09
Wow.  gnesterenko | 03/17/09
Double Wow  Tangoblue@... | 03/26/09
Well,  evilkillerwhale@... | 03/17/09
You do realize that Win95 wasn't new?  914four | 03/17/09
Ermmmm ... no!  de-void | 03/17/09
Sorry, but that's wrong.  914four | 03/17/09
95 not new  Col Mustard | 03/17/09
Realy  jdbukis@... | 03/21/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  Naryan | 03/17/09
And about 40 million use Linux  914four | 03/17/09
10% Mac share  tmsbrdrs | 03/17/09
Vista blast XP on decent hardware  IE8 | 03/17/09
not news  gnesterenko | 03/17/09
how about using excel 2007 for your graphs  whallify | 03/17/09
With a Billion dollar budget, your eventually going to create something...  pcguy777 | 03/17/09
Chevy's eat Fords/Fords eat Chevy's  rcfoulk@... | 03/17/09
Reluctantly agree with Adrian's impressions  pochinator | 03/17/09
Having multiple good OSes is good for everyone  jgpeters | 03/17/09
Low end machine faulty  flboffin | 03/17/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  bucca36 | 03/17/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  MarkWB | 03/17/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  cbpusa | 03/17/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  borrismorris | 03/17/09
ok the less than 1% od Dell systems that ship.....  rbslack@... | 03/19/09
The question remains  pogson | 03/25/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  windjammer_z | 03/17/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  thomasak001 | 03/18/09
total elapsed time would be useful to know  mahlon | 03/18/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  cbunting99 | 03/18/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  BigE123 | 03/18/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  ewterps | 03/18/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  atari8bit@... | 03/18/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  FLCAPT@... | 03/18/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  davidrix@... | 03/18/09
Back in the day....  LapDRx | 03/19/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  SteeLx | 03/20/09
Hard to believe...  Migration Expert Zone | 03/20/09
Let's hope that they do better...  jasonp@... | 03/20/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  Nihilkrist | 03/22/09
Windows/Linux zealotry aside.  currysoup | 03/23/09
It hibernates nicely....  mike21b@... | 03/24/09
Maybe...  mike21b@... | 03/24/09
who cares..  muzza2005 | 03/25/09
Amazingly fast and stable  keremer | 03/25/09
Windows Version 6.1???  ewingdweller | 03/25/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  EzeComputer | 03/26/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  Tangoblue@... | 03/26/09
Would love same benchmarks on Win2K for comparison  JavaJack | 03/26/09
RE: Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds  stenman@... | 03/27/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here