On CHOW: His burger will EAT your burger
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 29th, 2009

Windows 7 "XP Mode" system requirements

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 6:06 am

Categories: Virtual Machines, Windows 7

Tags: Microsoft Windows 7, System Requirement, CPU, Intel Corp., Virtualization, Microsoft Windows XP, BIOS, Microsoft Windows, Cloud Computing, Storage Management

User of the higher-end editions of Windows 7 (Professional, Ultimate and Enterprise) will be able to download and install the XP Mode feature that will allow them to run a virtualized copy of XP SP3 in order to minimize compatibility issues. However, to run this you’ll need a PC that’s up to the job.

So far the following system requirements have bee revealed:

  • 2GB system RAM
  • A CPU that supports chip-level virtualization

There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and these additional requirements above and beyond those of the Windows 7 OS itself are to be expected.

However, there’s a snag. It’s not easy to tell if your CPU supports chip-level virtualization (you also need to have it switched on in the BIOS, which means digging out the manual if you’re not familiar with the system BIOS). Fortunately, both Intel and AMD have tools to help you find out what your CPU is capable of.

Here’s Intel’s utility in action:

I have heard reports of these tools giving odd results at times, but I’ve never had a problem with them. If in doubt check out your processor’s capabilities on the manufacturer’s website.

So, XP Mode is handy technology, as long as you have a PC what can run it.

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 26 Talkback(s)
Me too
I'll be the third in the line happy... (Read the rest)
Posted by: fcdenton666 Posted on: 06/27/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Wow...  tonyhunterajh | 04/29/09
I'm glad I'm using..  yschoo1@... | 04/30/09
Another limitation: Chip-set virtualization  no_zd_user_name | 04/29/09
There should be a WARNING on the box...  BillDem | 04/29/09
So, if MS had not offered this, everything would be fine?  xuniL_z | 04/29/09
So? What is your point? MS should punish everyone, just because...  xuniL_z | 04/29/09
Diagnosis  no_zd_user_name | 04/30/09
It's not surprising you also consider yourself...  xuniL_z | 04/30/09
More Reasons For Not Upgrading  sandmanfvr | 04/29/09
This is for non-business users.  mikefarinha | 04/29/09
Artificial distinctions  frgough | 04/29/09
Stop lying  LiquidLearner | 04/29/09
Wow, did you just take business 101?  xuniL_z | 04/29/09
Except...  edwards.wb | 04/29/09
You're running a dual Xeon  LiquidLearner | 04/29/09
More reasons to move to Windows 7.  xuniL_z | 04/29/09
RE: Windows 7  sandmanfvr | 04/29/09
Bad Reply  sandmanfvr | 04/29/09
You're right  LiquidLearner | 04/29/09
Sweet  NStalnecker | 04/29/09
I'm fine on mine as well  LiquidLearner | 04/29/09
Yeah  NStalnecker | 04/29/09
But don't forget the next business lesson too  Zogg | 04/30/09
Oops - should have been reply to xuniL_z (NT)  Zogg | 04/30/09
Well said.  yschoo1@... | 04/30/09
Me too  fcdenton666 | 06/27/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads