On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 30th, 2009

UPDATED: Why is Mozilla getting involved in the IE/Chrome Frame debate?

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 4:12 pm

Categories: Software, Thoughts

Tags: Google Inc., Web Browser, Google Chrome, Mozilla Corp., Web Browsers, Internet, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Mozilla vice president Mike Shaver has criticized Google’s Chrome Frame, claiming it renders many of Internet Explorer’s features “less effective”. I have one question: Why is Mozilla getting caught up in the whole IE/Chrome Frame debate?

On his blog, Shaver is highly critical of Google Chrome Frame.

“Users who wish to render sites with Chrome can already use Chrome, of course, and should … Running Chrome Frame within IE makes many of the browser application’s features non-functional, or less effective. These include private browsing mode or their other security controls, features like accelerators or add-ons that operate on the content area, or even accessibility support.”

There’s only one reason that I can come up with as to why Mozilla are so anti Chrome Frame - because Mozilla is worried that, after making IE a better browser, Google might next turn its attention to Firefox. After all, Google’s not really interested in capturing a browser market share. What Google wants to do is get a foothold on as many computers and browsers as possible. Google will do this not just through browsers, but through toolbar, search tools, operating systems and plug-ins to make browsers better.

Given that Google has a faster JavaScript engine than Mozilla, there’s no reason not to assume that Google might not try to shoehorn the engine into Firefox. The best defense for Mozilla is a strong offense, and so it makes sense to try to knock this whole Chrome Frame thing on the head right from the start, before people start taking it seriously.

Problem is, Chrome Frame is compelling technology because it allows people to switch browsers without really switching. That’s scary technology for the folks in the browser business because it could start to erode the concept of market share, which has become the bedrock of the whole “which browser is best” debate.

While it remains to be seen whether Chrome Frame will catch on or not, it’s certainly disruptive technology.

[UPDATE: And here we have it:

Google may intend to produce a Chrome Frame plug-in for Firefox, Mozilla's chief engineer said.

"The code is certainly there," said Mike Shaver, Mozilla's vice president of engineering, referring to parts of the Chrome Frame source code that indicate Google could crank out a Firefox plug-in similar to what Google released last week for Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE).

Could Google make Firefox better?]

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 26 Talkback(s)
Mozilla is afraid of a Chrome plug-in? Oh, really?
Then explain to me why Mozilla's add-on library makes
available an add-on called "IE Tab" that allows
Firefox users to browse using IE's engine if they so
please? Google Chrome isn't a se... (Read the rest)
Posted by: yfan Posted on: 10/05/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Your world must be fun  tonymcs@... | 09/30/09
I've already had to...  GoodThings2Life | 09/30/09
"*I* have begun using..."  betelgeuse68 | 09/30/09
I can tell you a simple business reason ...  wackoae | 09/30/09
Re: I can tell you a simple business reason ...  jetsethi | 10/01/09
Blah, blah. Please. We KNOW who you work for. Give it up already! (NT)  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 10/01/09
Well...there is that repeated  Isocrates | 10/01/09
Hope you're not one of those HIGH PAID IT folks!  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 10/01/09
Well...again...there is that repeatedly  Isocrates | 10/01/09
If I worked for you I'd kick your teeth in. Bigot! (NT)  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 10/01/09
Not a million miles from (your) home.  peter_erskine@... | 10/01/09
The problem with Chrome...  GoodThings2Life | 09/30/09
Faster JS engine ain't mean nothing  LBiege | 09/30/09
To Google it does.  CobraA1 | 09/30/09
RE: Why is Mozilla getting involved in the IE/Chrome Frame debate?  jagdogg1975@... | 09/30/09
Mozilla feeling jilted  djchandler | 09/30/09
Ubuntu, Firefox and Chromium  root12 | 10/01/09
I Agree  rikasa | 10/01/09
Further validation  djchandler | 10/02/09
Situations where Chrome Frame is ideal  linuser | 10/01/09
Perfect browser: Firefox Chrome speed and separate processes!  plino | 10/01/09
RE: Why is Mozilla getting involved in the IE/Chrome Frame debate?  Loverock Davidson | 10/01/09
RE: Why is Mozilla getting involved in the IE/Chrome Frame debate?  NCWeber | 10/01/09
Chrome Frame for Firefox might not be a bad idea  linuser | 10/01/09
RE: Why is Mozilla getting involved in the IE/Chrome Frame debate?  cny93578@... | 10/02/09
Mozilla is afraid of a Chrome plug-in? Oh, really?  yfan | 10/05/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline