Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Vista struggling? OCZ launch 8GB and 16GB upgrade kits
Next Post: Apple sued for … slavery?!?!!
Posted in:
[UPDATE: Many of you have asked about the effectivness of VIPRE. Testing security software is a big job and well outside of my capability. However, VIPRE has passed West Coast Labs' Checkmark certification. Details here. I am told that more certification is in the pipeline.]The other day when I blogged about Sunbelt Software's latest VIPRE antivirus solution I took the claims that it doesn't slow down your PC pretty much at face value. Time to see if there's any validity to these claims. Test system #1
Note: When loaded with 4GB or RAM the 32-bit system registered 3.2GB of RAM.
Note: No optimizations were carried out on either system other than defragging the drive and making sure that all background tasks had finished.Testing Each system was imaged so that three antivirus products could be installed onto the OS (after testing the system was rolled back to the clean image). The three antivirus products tested were:
Note: All settings on each of the antivirus software packages was left in the default configuration.Testing was done with PassMark PerformanceTest 6.1 (32-bit and 64-bit for the respective operating systems). For each test PassMark PerformanceTest 6.1 was run three times and the scores averaged to achieve the final score.
Note: Only the effect of background (or realtime) scanning was tested. Running the benchmark during a full system scan generated results that were too inconsistent to publish.
posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes
August 7, 2008 @ 8:19 am
Previous Post: Vista struggling? OCZ launch 8GB and 16GB upgrade kits
Next Post: Apple sued for … slavery?!?!!
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.