On The Insider: Heidi Klum Takes Seal's Name
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 12th, 2009

Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff

Posted by Sean Portnoy @ 7:57 am

Categories: Home Theater

Tags: Marketing, Plasma, TV, LCD, Monitors & Displays, Tv & Home Theater, Hardware, Components, Personal Technology, Sean Portnoy

Displaymate, the research company that provides the benchmarks for many publications’ testing of monitor and HDTVs, has just performed a new side-by-side study (in collaboration with market research firm Insight Media) of LCD and plasmas from top manufacturers’ 2008 lines, and its findings shouldn’t be much of a surprise to the cynics among us.

The most notable conclusion is that LCDs have a much, much narrower viewing angle than plasmas, something that’s been known for some time but apparently still hasn’t been solved by TV manufacturers. Specifically, Displaymate found that viewing its test LCDs at a 45-degree angle reduced the contrast ratio and black luminance by far greater than 50 percent. In comparison, the test plasma’s values were reduced roughly 10 percent. It’s another measure of plasma’s technical superiority, which will be mostly ignored by the majority of consumers who will select LCDs instead.

Plasmas aren’t totally off the hook, though, as TV manufacturers making either kind of set are guilty of offering new “features” that Displaymate says are a bunch of hooey. According to the study, the dynamic picture-processing technologies that LG, Panasonic, Samsung, Sharp and Sony (the brands tested) hype “all reduce picture quality and accuracy and introduce ugly image artifacts.” This included the dynamic LED backlighting from the Samsung LN-T5281F.

Those crazy dynamic contrast ratios that are advertised as 15,000:1 or 30,000:1 are also more than a bit charitable. Displaymate found that the Panasonic professional plasma (the TH-50PF10UK) was best at a dynamic contrast ratio with 3,842:1, with the Samsung measuring 50 percent lower and Sharp and Sony’s sets running closer to 1,350:1.

The study is part of a series, with the next installment covering response time and motion blur. Don’t expect 120Hz refresh rates to fare that well. In the meantime, you can read the current study here

[Via the New York Times Gadgetwise blog.]

Sean PortnoySean Portnoy spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Sean Portnoy

Subscribe to Home Theater via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 41 Talkback(s)
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff
wow. no loss of view at an impossible angle. that's some badass technology. no wonder you paid so much for your lcd/... (Read the rest)
Posted by: focusandconcentrate@... Posted on: 09/14/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Viewing angle no problem...  gfeier | 07/12/09
A corner?  unredeemed | 07/12/09
People should not have to modify viewing habits  matt832 | 07/13/09
Actually . . .  JLHenry | 07/13/09
Viewing Angle  jemd@... | 08/10/09
oops!  jemd@... | 08/10/09
Didn't address the issue  Synthmeister | 07/13/09
Ridiculous claims  HT Slider | 07/13/09
LEDs are the future...  UAC nanny screen | 07/13/09
Re: viewing angle no problem...  dedrizen | 07/13/09
More B.S.  Stoshie | 07/14/09
Oh that's rich.  Skidpalace | 08/10/09
By your father's way of thinking  TranMan | 08/11/09
And what normal people look at their TVs other than from a..  NeoGeneration | 07/12/09
Because it's not all about TV  Takalok | 07/12/09
Normal people that  John Zern | 07/12/09
Hear, Hear!!! (nt)  JLHenry | 07/13/09
Crazy People viewing TVs  FiOS-Dave | 07/13/09
Wrong problem?  Synthmeister | 07/13/09
Viewing Angle of LCDs  peterwguenther@... | 07/13/09
Some of us have friends, you know...  MV_z | 07/13/09
It Could Happen  Stoshie | 07/14/09
Fast moving images are more problem!  privacy matters | 07/12/09
DisplayMate is the "Problem"!  kd5auq | 07/12/09
"WE" are the problem!  FiOS-Dave | 07/13/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff  alexh1111 | 07/13/09
viewing angles  dhays | 07/13/09
So is 1080P... to a degree...  sgmunson | 07/13/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff  enawn | 07/13/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff  batia | 07/13/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff  robert@... | 07/13/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff  enawn | 07/13/09
Compares to.....?  Rich_077 | 07/13/09
What if I WANT a narrow viewing angle????  Narg | 07/13/09
Yes, Plasma has advantages. But it's a DEAD product.  Rick S._z | 07/13/09
Leave LCD for corporate signage and portable electronics  soloist3 | 07/13/09
Not a reality with this LCD set ???  rpotter@... | 07/13/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff  tbrien@... | 07/13/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketin  mschroder@... | 07/13/09
Who believes technical superiority wins?  john.foggitt@... | 07/14/09
RE: Study: LCD viewing angles are too narrow, many TV features are marketing fluff  focusandconcentrate@... | 09/14/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline