On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 14th, 2008

Comcast, other cable IP phone providers complain to FCC over Verizon's "retention marketing" tactics

Posted by Russell Shaw @ 9:42 am

Categories: Comcast, Regulatory, Time Warner Cable, Verizon

Tags: FCC, Marketing, Complaint, Comcast Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., Retention Marketing, Cable, Federal Government, Network Technology, Telecommunications

Cable television broadband Internet access and VoIP providers Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks have filed a complaint with the FCC against Verizon.

The complaint alleges that Verizon takes improper “retention marketing” steps to retain customers that have committed to try VoIP services offered by the three cable companies filing the dispute.

Retention marketing is said to be counter to FCC rules.

In this specific case, some of the acrimony comes from Verizon’s actions after finding out that their former customers have signed for VoIP services with cable competitors. Verizon is being accused of reacting to this news by bombarding these defecting customers with “price incentives and gift cards” to change their minds and stay with Verizon.

“While some customers rebuffed Verizon’s inducements to stay while the port requests were pending, thousands of customers accepted Verizon’s offers, after which Verizon cancelled their orders for [cable VoIP],” the MSOs’ complaint states.

The sticky issue here is that the FCC allows Verizon to launch marketing campaigns to win back customers who have already defected, but other FCC rules do not allow such “retention marketing” during the defection process.

This filing should be seen for what it is — another cable company effort to block consumer choice as competition heats up,” Verizon spokesman David Fish tells Ted Hearn of cable television trade newspaper Multichannel News. “Verizon’s retention marketing is lawful, does not interfere with number porting and, most important, it allows consumers to choose a better alternative.  It’s hard to believe that cable would attempt to block consumers from receiving information about additional services and lower prices.”

Russell Shaw is an enterprise computing journalist, analyst and author based in Portland, Oregon. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)
RE: Comcast, other cable IP phone providers complain to FCC over Verizon's
So competition is tough! As I read it the Cable outfits have been having a field day cherry picking Verizon customer lines over the past few years. Now Verizon decides it is time to fight to hold on t... (Read the rest)
Posted by: SeasideheightsOBX Posted on: 03/18/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I Wish The FCC would permanently fix Verizon  Qlueless | 02/14/08
Sounds like a Country Western song ....  kd5auq | 02/14/08
Nothing wrong with Verizon  GuidingLight | 02/14/08
Havent had a problem with their wireless network.  Been_Done_Before | 02/14/08
RE: Comcast, other cable IP phone providers complain to FCC over Verizon's  SeasideheightsOBX | 03/18/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads