On BNET: Look like you're working
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 4th, 2007

Microsoft starts rolling out more OOXML translators

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 10:20 am

Categories: App Compatibility, Corporate strategy, Novell, Office, Office 2007

Tags: Interoperability, Microsoft Corp., OpenDocument Format, OOXML, OpenDocument Format (ODF), Emerging Technologies, Mary Jo Foley

In Focus » See more posts on: ODF

Over the next three months, Microsoft will be releasing new and updated translators designed to aid customers who want interoperability between Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) and other document formats, including Open Document Format (ODF).

On December 4, Microsoft began rolling out three new translators that it plans to make available this month: A 1.1 update of its translator for Word; an Open XML spreadsheet translator and a presentation translator.

Additionally, in February 2008, Microsoft will deliver the final version of its translator designed to provide interoperability between the Chinese-government backed Uniform Office Format (UOF) file format and OOXML.

Microsoft announced the creation of the SourceForge-hosted Open Translation Project in July 2006. At that time, the Softies said the translator-focused initiatve was started “in response to government requests for interoperability with ODF because they work with constituent groups that use that format.”

Vijay Rajagopalan, a Microsoft Principal Architect, provided the update on the OOXML-ODF translation work during the XML 2007 conference on Decmeber 4.

During the XML 2007 interoperability panel — sponsored by Microsoft and of which Rajagopalan was a part — the ongoing battles that have raged for the past couple of years between Microsoft and the backers of ODF were a mere sidenote.

Miguel de Icaza, Novell Vice President of Developer Platforms, said at the outset of his remarks on OOXML and ODF interop that he was not going to get into the corporate politics surrounding the two formats. De Icaza noted that Novell supports both OOXML and ODF via its use of Open Office.

“In 2006, there was lots of FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) about the problems behind OOXML and it went downhill from there,” de Icaza said.

De Icaza said Novell’s major issue around the dueling file formats was “there is no one-to-one mapping” between them. There are features in ODF, like Page Styles, which have no equivalent in OOXML.

“Neither group (Microsoft nor the ODF camp) is willing to make the big changes required for real compatibility,” de Icaza said. Even though ODF plug-ins exist for Microsoft Office, there’s still a big question around whether Microsoft should/will integrate this functionality into a future version of Office.

“We need Microsoft’s (ODF interoperability) commitment to go beyond 1.0,” he said.

Objection over the size of Microsoft’s and the ODF’s file-format specs is a red herring, de Icaza said. What’s really needed is more developers who are building applications using OOXML and ODF to offer critiques of what does/doesn’t work, in terms of interoperability.

There’s no end in sight to the ongoing disputes between the two file-format camps, de Icaza said.

“Sadly, there is a lot of money at stake here,” de Icaza concluded.

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 33 Talkback(s)
Standardization by Corporation

Maybe i spoke to soon. This just came in from ISO, the resignation letter of the SC34WG1 Chairman who has completed his three year term. (Read the rest)

Posted by: gary_edwards Posted on: 12/06/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
All part of the plan  LittleGuy | 12/04/07
Why not particiate?  craigkitterman | 12/05/07
OOXML is not formatted for Interopratibility  RLillySR | 12/04/07
Korea and South Africa?  CobraA1 | 12/04/07
Korea and South Africa?  RLillySR | 12/04/07
ODF is not formated for interoprability  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
ODF is not formated for interoprability  RLillySR | 12/04/07
What part of it is escaping you?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
Or...  SpikeyMike | 12/04/07
Bingo...  jasonp@... | 12/04/07
Not hardly...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
Disposable income?  SpikeyMike | 12/05/07
Its the part escaping you  RLillySR | 12/04/07
GM OWNED the car market  j.m.galvin | 12/04/07
I agree, MARKET FORCES changed things, not a  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
No_Ax_IsaBigBe_Hind  kozmcrae | 12/05/07
Not only true  IT_User | 12/04/07
Not only true  RLillySR | 12/04/07
Acutally you answered your own question  IT_User | 12/04/07
When was Office ruled a monopoly?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
True, ODF is irrelevant and as  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
Red herring  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/04/07
simply not true of ODF 1.2  shis-ka-bob | 12/04/07
Try this then...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
Sorry Shish, you're wrong about ODF 1.2  gary_edwards | 12/05/07
Standardization by Corporation  gary_edwards | 12/06/07
This just in: De Icaza is full of crap  zaine_ridling | 12/04/07
This just in: Zaine Ridling is full of crap  easson | 12/04/07
Truth, IBM and Sun have failed  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/07
Fotune Teller  Radical-One | 12/04/07
How, you ask?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/05/07
Boy, you said it Miguel.  kozmcrae | 12/05/07
Hmm  John Musbach | 12/05/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here