On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 9th, 2008

OLPCs to be dual-boot Linux/Windows machines? Why?

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 8:00 am

Categories: CES 2008, Channel, Corporate strategy, OEMs, Resellers, System builders, Vista, Windows XP, Windows client

Tags: Microsoft Corp., Laptop Computer, One Laptop Per Child Project, Nicholas Negroponte, Microsoft Windows, Operating Systems, Software, Mary Jo Foley

In Focus » See more posts on: OLPC, CES

Nicholas Negroponte, the head of the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) is speaking for Microsoft (again).

Negroponte was quoted by Computerworld as saying Microsoft is working with the OLPC team on a dual-boot Windows XP/Linux XO laptop.

Microsoft officials have not publicly acknowledged any such plans. All Microsoft officials have said is that they are still trying to determine whether XP will work on the OLPC XO systems. Field tests of XP-based OLPCs were set to begin this month (January 2008), last anyone heard.

I’ve asked Microsoft whether they have decided to support a dual-boot Windows/Linux configuration as participants in the OLPC initiative. No word back yet from the Redmondians.

Update: Microsoft issued a statement late on January 9 denying that dual-boot XP/Linux laptops are on its agenda. 

Negroponte’s statements from CES this week raise a number of questions beyond whether Microsoft has bestowed its blessing on dual-boot XO laptops.

First: Why would anyone — kids, governments and/or laptop makers — want a dual-boot Linux/Windows OLPC systems in the first place? Dual-boot Macs make sense: There are some Windows-only programs that Mac users want/need to run. But this scenario doesn’t make sense for the kinds of apps that XO laptops will be geared to run.

Next: Will XO laptops even have enough horsepower to dual-boot Windows and Linux? Add some third-party apps on top of two operating systems and it sure sounds like a slow, kludgey mess to me.

Negroponte’s also gone on record saying that he plans to introduce an OLPC for the U.S. market. Will these machines also be dual-boot XP/Linux systems? I’d think Microsoft’s OEM and system builder partners might have some qualms about Microsoft backing a low-end XP-based PC that could cut into demand for their other (Vista) systems here in the U.S.

Sure, a dual-boot Windows/Linux OLPC would end the debate as to whether Windows or Linux OLPCs will have more appeal in developing nations. But would such a machine be anything more than an unnecessary compromise? What’s your take?

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 95 Talkback(s)
OLPC doesn't need a Microsoft endorsement. (nt)
happy

. (Read the rest)
Posted by: wessonjoe Posted on: 01/11/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Microsoft not using Vista ????  mrOSX | 01/09/08
lofl  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/09/08
Because MS Learned with Vista  farg9987 | 01/09/08
windows software is all ready on a lot of embedded devices.  SO.CAL Guy | 01/09/08
Huh?  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/09/08
RE: OLPCs to be dual-boot Linux/Windows machines? Why?  justthinking | 01/09/08
It's the US market  TripleII | 01/09/08
vista basic runs great on low end hardware faster than  SO.CAL Guy | 01/09/08
If that were true, then MS would be porting Vista to the XO.  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
Who's to say they aren't already?  JDThompson | 01/09/08
They're Not  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/09/08
Vista and OLPC  Mary Jo FoleyZDNet Moderator | 01/09/08
Hardening XP  TripleII | 01/09/08
Still, kind of funny that the only thing MS can use is a 6 year old OS,  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
Why? OLPC HW is six year "old" technology.  ye | 01/09/08
Actually...  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/09/08
Please define "full distribution".  ye | 01/09/08
result of a slow OS not a slow PC  brokndodge@... | 01/09/08
BINGO!  ye | 01/09/08
not stripped... streamlined!  brokndodge@... | 01/09/08
What's the difference between "streamlined" and "stripped down"?  ye | 01/09/08
Difference  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/09/08
XP minimums are not enough to run a current version of...  ye | 01/10/08
Definition  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/09/08
IOW strip it down to increase speed.  ye | 01/10/08
The OLPC is a cutting edge design, but, it was optimized for power use and  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
Which full distribution is it? (nt)  ye | 01/09/08
It is a modified version of Fedora using a special Window manager and GUI  DonnieBoy | 01/10/08
Key word: Modified.  ye | 01/10/08
Answer Me This Mary  itanalyst | 01/09/08
Answer me this itanalyst  itpro_z | 01/09/08
It's not. He just likes to talk the talk.  ye | 01/09/08
Nothing wrong with profit  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/09/08
huge profits?  brokndodge@... | 01/09/08
"The end of an era..."  itpro_z | 01/09/08
...  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/10/08
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst | 01/09/08
Read My Post At The Bottom "Best Post"  itanalyst | 01/09/08
The question was valid.  itpro_z | 01/09/08
something is missing here  Linux Geek | 01/09/08
RE: OLPCs to be dual-boot Linux/Windows machines? Why?  DannyO_0x98 | 01/09/08
Why Not?  sinleeh@... | 01/09/08
Still, almost any Windows program would need to be re-written for the form  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
True  sinleeh@... | 01/09/08
It would be there and that's better for MS than not there  Boot_Agnostic | 01/09/08
Do you run Vista???  farg9987 | 01/09/08
I agree with you on that...  mrOSX | 01/09/08
re: Do you run Vista???  M.R. Kennedy | 01/09/08
You have to realize ...  farg9987 | 01/09/08
I haven't notice much difference either  voska1 | 01/09/08
Yes, I do  itpro_z | 01/09/08
Whaaa?  mswift@... | 01/09/08
Money  srobtjones@... | 01/09/08
A very interesting chess game going on here. The ONLY reason MS is in this  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
*Yawn*  GuidingLight | 01/09/08
Right, kind of funny you could not even describe how ONE thing I said was  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
Actually,  Chustar | 01/09/08
Actaully, he claimed I have a bias, he did not even try to give one example  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
The examples are in your past submissions.  joethemacfan | 01/09/08
Still, he gave NO example or argument for why anything I said is wrong.  DonnieBoy | 01/10/08
Right?  thungurknifur | 01/10/08
EXACTLY DONNIE  itanalyst | 01/09/08
the $3 solution  mswift@... | 01/09/08
windows xp on OLPC  ThinkFair | 01/09/08
Very true. It would also be good if the XO could just boot from the network  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
Except ...  farg9987 | 01/09/08
Right, it would ONLY be for locations that had a school server with  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
re Right, it would ONLY be for locations that had a school server  M.R. Kennedy | 01/09/08
These are not just for Villages in the middle of Africa with no electricity  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
school server vs. school sewer  woftbo@... | 01/09/08
Come on, there are plenty of places that have sewers and other  DonnieBoy | 01/09/08
Where do the dots connect?  orcmid | 01/09/08
Yeah, "why" is the right question...  techboy_z | 01/09/08
Horsepower?  voska1 | 01/09/08
Smell the fear  whisperycat | 01/09/08
RE: OLPCs to be dual-boot Linux/Windows machines? Why?  andrew@... | 01/09/08
OLPC market will skip laptops, straight to mobile  andrew@... | 01/09/08
Intresting idea...  Heatlesssun1 | 01/09/08
mobile works better for BOP actual use  andrew@... | 01/09/08
Best Response To This So Far  itanalyst | 01/09/08
MS bootloader will boot linux  brokndodge@... | 01/09/08
Grub is far better...  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/09/08
Grub and Windows  kwsjr82 | 01/10/08
Response  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/10/08
This is your best?  itpro_z | 01/09/08
Shut Up, Fool  itanalyst | 01/09/08
Wrong  DarkPhoenixFF4 | 01/10/08
Hmmm...  kwsjr82 | 01/10/08
Big project to develop code  Louis.Ross@... | 01/10/08
RE: OLPCs to be dual-boot Linux/Windows machines? Why?  woftbo@... | 01/09/08
IMHO, Negroponte is a whiny media pig  DaffyDuck | 01/09/08
OLPC + Asus  Windows Defender | 01/09/08
Why, indeed.  seanferd | 01/09/08
Why replace free with proprietary?  mannyamador | 01/10/08
OLPC doesn't need a Microsoft endorsement. (nt)  wessonjoe | 01/11/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline