On CBS.com: Get More On Amazing Race Eliminated Team
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 28th, 2008

Don't be fooled: Windows 7 hasn't slipped to 2011

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 7:24 pm

Categories: Corporate strategy, Service Pack, Vista, Windows 7, Windows client

Tags: Microsoft Windows 7, Microsoft Corp., Microsoft Windows, Operating Systems, Software, Mary Jo Foley

This is just a quick post to help guide those who aren’t used to Micro-speak.

Contrary to many blog posts you may have read over the past day or so, Windows 7’s due date has not slipped — at least not yet. This is the exchange between Microsoft and site WinVista Club that many sites have been quoting to prove that Windows 7, the successor to Vista, is running late:

Q: (From WinVista Club): “What is the expected timeline for the availability of Windows 7?”

A. (From Microsoft, via email): “We are currently in the planning stages for Windows 7 and expect it will take approximately 3 years to develop. The specific release date will be determined once the company meets its quality bar for release.”

Here’s how to interpret this Microsoft statement.

Windows execs have been using the “in planning” line about Windows 7 since last year. My bet: The Windows dev team will likely say that Windows 7 is in planning until the day it is released to manufacturing. Planning simply means not done; it doesn’t mean it does not exist in bootable form, in the new “translucent” Windows world order.

Microsoft is continuing to tell folks it will take the Windows team three years to release Windows 7. Windows Vista was released to manufacturing in November 2007 2006. If Microsoft took the full three years, that would make Windows 7 a 2009 deliverable (and 2010 if you count from January 2007 as the Vista ship date) — a ship target Microsoft first stated last summer.

But based on early Windows 7 screen shots, which continue to proliferate, it seems like the Windows team is leaning toward delivering a smaller, more finite release, rather than another big-bang like Vista. Fewer features means less time needed for development and testing — not more.

One of my sources close to Microsoft weighed in recently with this observation: “Windows 7 is cleaning up some UI (user interface) and will feel more like a SP (service pack) than (Vista) SP1. In fact, it looks like the only changes will be around the Task Bar (’the tray’) and not much else. There is a big push to take more (out of) Windows,” not to cram more features into it.

I’m still betting we could see Windows 7 ship in 2009. Moral of the story: Every Microsoft statement about future Windows releases may not be what it initially seems.

Update: On January 29, The Windows client team decided to provide a bit more clarity regarding how to calculate its ship date commitment. A company spokeswoman provided this updated sound bite:

“We are currently in the planning stages for Windows 7 and development is scoped to three years from Windows Vista Consumer GA (general availability)The specific release date will be determined once the company meets its quality bar for release. “

Consumer GA was January 30, 2007. So Microsoft’s official public statement remains that Windows 7 wil be released in 2010, three years after the consumer launch of Vista.

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 30 Talkback(s)
Oh please, save it!
Nobody here cares or came to read bout your zealotry. You folks with the Linux crowd is what turned me so far away from your favorite Operating Systems in the first place.

When will you idiots learn?... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Kromaethius Posted on: 08/06/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Wrong year for Vista RTM  jeffbean12@... | 01/28/08
I don't think it's that far fetched  Michael Kelly | 01/28/08
I don't think MS has ever been on time for anything, have they?  Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 | 01/28/08
So change never happens?  quikboy | 01/29/08
In order for MS to shorten its release schedule  Michael Kelly | 01/28/08
Continuing changes to the kernel  Anton Philidor | 01/29/08
Not really...  dhavleak@... | 01/29/08
WHO CARES?  Jeremy W | 01/28/08
That's Supposed to be the point of WIN7  tomam | 01/29/08
Is this WInVistaClub email even real?  thethirdeye | 01/29/08
Ship less features and improve the existing?  nucrash | 01/29/08
Moral of the story  dfolk | 01/29/08
Windows 7 will be like Vista: Too little, too late!  netzd | 01/29/08
So you can see the future?  quikboy | 01/29/08
Who care about OS X  Drakaran | 03/11/09
Oh please, save it!  Kromaethius | 08/06/09
Pie in the Sky  Ole Man | 01/29/08
anyway, PDC08 coming...  Raiker | 01/29/08
No new features? Service pack that we have to pay for?!  John Musbach | 01/29/08
If you have to pay for service packs, use OS X  quikboy | 01/29/08
RE: Don't be fooled: Windows 7 hasn't slipped to 2011  Randalllind | 01/30/08
64 bits?  Thore | 01/30/08
Best bet...  Jeremy W | 01/30/08
RE: Don't be fooled: Windows 7 hasn't slipped to 2011  techJerk | 01/31/08
RE: Don't be fooled: Windows 7 hasn't slipped to 2011  FooBarBar | 02/04/08
Clueless people !!!!  jogiba@... | 02/09/08
RE: Don't be fooled: Windows 7 hasn't slipped to 2011  morrig | 03/22/08
So only thing new is the taskbar?  Randalllind | 11/11/08
Different with Office and Ballmer  Drakaran | 03/11/09
Oops! - I meant this in reply to MS not being on time  Drakaran | 03/11/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads