On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 4th, 2008

Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 9:12 am

Categories: Channel, Corporate strategy, OEMs, Resellers, System builders, Vista, Windows 7, Windows client

Tags: Microsoft Windows 7, Microsoft Corp., Windows Client Milestone, Microsoft Windows, Operating Systems, Software, Mary Jo Foley

Over the past couple of days, I’ve noticed more new speculation about Microsoft’s timetable for delivering Windows 7, the next version of Windows.

Now, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates’ words are being parsed for hidden meanings. According to my News.com colleague Ina Fried, Gates said this week during a speech before the Inter-American Development Bank: “Sometime in the next year or so we will have a new (Windows) version.”

Microsoft officials are insisting nothing has changed: Windows 7 is due out roughly three years after Windows Vista’s consumer launch (which was January 2007), meaning in early 2010.

As I have mentioned before, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Softies actually deliver the final Windows 7 code in late 2009, given the current Windows Client team’s emphasis on underpromising and overdelivering — not to mention the self-imposed rule among the Windows folks that they should deliver a new Windows release every two years, alternating between “major” and “minor” updates. And given the fact that pushing out a new Windows release early in a new calendar year is not optimal for PC makers, who need final Windows code from Microsoft by late summer/early fall in order to preload a new operating system on holiday PCs, an early 2010 RTM date also seems wonky.

Remember, however, Microsoft still has yet to release a wide-scale test build of Windows 7. Milestone 1 of Windows 7 went to a limited set of testers in December 2007. I’ve heard mentions of Milestone 3 from a couple of folks recently. Windows client milestones are primarily internal builds that also go to a hand of OEM partners.

Beta 1 of Windows 7, last I heard from rogue tipsters, might hit in late fall at the Microsoft Professional Developers Conference. Typically, it takes Microsoft a minimum of a year to beta test a Windows client build. So, if Microsoft sticks to its usual way of operating, it’s currently looking a very late 2009 delivery for Windows 7 at best.

Why do these nuances matter? It is in Microsoft’s best interests right now, one could argue, to insure customers they shouldn’t wait for Windows 7 and should go ahead and deploy Vista. If Windows 7 were to hit in mid-2009, a number of users (especially corporate ones) would likely just wait for the next Windows release, hoping that the driver and application incompatibilities that plagued Vista might get ironed out and that changes that might introduce new problems would be kept to a minimum.

Would you like to see another new version of Windows client in 2009?

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 148 Talkback(s)
You and your amigos seem to have overlooked
the fact that many people can read...... "stuff" other than your drivel. (Read the rest)
Posted by: Ole Man Posted on: 04/19/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
80% Vaporware  wackoae | 04/04/08
Vaporware ???  redtrain65 | 04/04/08
You missunderstand  Stuka | 04/04/08
For instance....  MGP2 | 04/04/08
A while two examples? With one being questionable?  ye | 04/05/08
RE:A while two examples  n0neXn0ne | 04/07/08
every file system in existence  rtk | 04/07/08
ah, but you forget....  jlafitte | 04/08/08
Clueless guy ....  wackoae | 04/04/08
Yes, vapourware  fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
can't zdnet get a banhammer already?  rtk | 04/06/08
likewise like it not  llval@... | 04/08/08
what do you know about it  pcguy777 | 04/04/08
damned if they do, damned if they don't...  jamesrayg | 04/04/08
Looks like they're just "damned" then, don't it?  Ole Man | 04/05/08
What I don't get  marks055@... | 04/06/08
ask google.  rtk | 04/06/08
My search item's still there....  jlafitte | 04/08/08
It'll be here when it gets here  Michael Kelly | 04/04/08
Because SP2 takes a few years wink (nt)  Stuka | 04/04/08
Microsoft, "get it right", are you sure that's possible?  fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
They got it right with Vista.  ye | 04/05/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  Rogre | 04/04/08
7 will be more like Linux than XP.  bjbrock | 04/04/08
Yes and No  LiquidLearner | 04/04/08
The reference to Windows in the first paragraph should be Vista  LiquidLearner | 04/04/08
Get a Vista kind of LIFE!!  mikeholli | 04/05/08
Serious Business  Anarchaotical | 04/05/08
LOL  BigMattock | 04/06/08
sigh  obilesk | 04/05/08
anti-virus? I have one word for you....  jlafitte | 04/08/08
the registy isn't going anywhere.  rtk | 04/04/08
"It will benefit from over 4 years of experience"  fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
but will you be able to upgrade from xp to 7 (thats the key)  pcguy777 | 04/04/08
You mean Microsoft are "inventing" .config files at long last?  fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
...  jamesrayg | 04/04/08
You mean 'Innovate'? (NT)  cmjrees | 04/05/08
Nice tear down of your strawman.  ye | 04/05/08
Why do ABMers think if they repeat something...  ye | 04/05/08
One could interpret your post as Windows has stagnated for 10 years.  B.O.F.H. | 04/05/08
only if you reinvent the definintion of stagnate. (nt)  rtk | 04/05/08
As long as users can be churned, all is good!  B.O.F.H. | 04/05/08
LOL! He says knowing that 5 years passed between...  ye | 04/05/08
Eh?  rtk | 04/05/08
gates of chAos, most pay a bill grin  llval@... | 04/08/08
Not from the stuff I've read  voska1 | 04/07/08
excellent idea  andyILM | 04/05/08
MS doesn't want to say...  bjbrock | 04/04/08
Hurry up MS?  boomchuck1 | 04/04/08
More marketshare than linux+mac combined...  jamesrayg | 04/04/08
LOL Microsoft Is Plain Pathetic  itanalyst2@... | 04/04/08
XP was 2003  ibtechnologies@... | 04/04/08
ME and XP were a year apart.  jmiller1978 | 04/04/08
Windows MissEllie  llval@... | 04/08/08
LOL, your shilling is pathetic.  rtk | 04/04/08
LOL, your shilling is pathetic.  fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
Who's hype?  ye | 04/05/08
There is no hype for 7  rtk | 04/05/08
you simply  royalstream | 04/06/08
LOL Your Posting Is Pathetic  itanalyst2@... | 04/04/08
Yes,  jamesrayg | 04/04/08
your knowledge is weak.  rtk | 04/06/08
another big difference  royalstream | 04/06/08
What?  russc@... | 04/04/08
Development here also, hate it  Stuka | 04/04/08
Specifically where is Vista a nightmare?  ye | 04/05/08
Specifically where is Vista any good?  Ole Man | 04/05/08
Ok...  russc@... | 04/05/08
Thank you!, but...........  Ole Man | 04/05/08
That didn't answer my question. (nt)  ye | 04/05/08
Message has been deleted.  Ole Man | 04/06/08
I got your good stuff right here...  jlafitte | 04/08/08
You and your amigos seem to have overlooked  Ole Man | 04/19/08
They aren't talking about it. ABMers are.  ye | 04/05/08
Not quite  voska1 | 04/07/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  hesser@... | 04/04/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  Inigo Chamerberlin | 04/04/08
You missed points 3 and 4  fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
that's a whole other area of speculation...  jlafitte | 04/08/08
Q: Would you like to see another new version of Windows client in 2009?  Mr_IT | 04/04/08
Microsoft was taking too much flak  Ole Man | 04/05/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  salliemander63@... | 04/04/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  dmhd@... | 04/04/08
The only places I see MS making money from Windows  Beat a Dead Horse | 04/04/08
Completely wrong  mlambert890@... | 04/04/08
Are you serious?  fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
people said the EXACT same crap about Win 2000  Ole Man | 04/05/08
here's the truly ironic part  rtk | 04/05/08
That's funny!  Ole Man | 04/05/08
yeah  rtk | 04/05/08
Ummm, win2k = 1st "Windows Server"  J242 | 04/06/08
nope  rtk | 04/06/08
Message has been deleted.  rtk | 04/06/08
Message has been deleted.  Ole Man | 04/06/08
Message has been deleted.  rtk | 04/06/08
re: rtk  J242 | 04/07/08
What about security updates?  jmiller1978 | 04/04/08
gibson ! grin if I am informed well, not sued by ms at the moment  llval@... | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  mark_berkowitz@... | 04/04/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  chris_ost2003@... | 04/04/08
Will wait and see RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  carlsf@... | 04/04/08
Re: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  Clewin | 04/04/08
I just want a lightweight OS will all the security of vista and then some  pcguy777 | 04/04/08
re: correction: "with all the security" .... / amd athlon 3400  pcguy777 | 04/04/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  geewhizbang | 04/04/08
I Like Vista  rjohn05 | 04/04/08
re: I Like Vista.  jamesrayg | 04/04/08
Me too!  Ole Man | 04/05/08
Many?  rtk | 04/05/08
And you're counting each and every one of them, eh?  Ole Man | 04/05/08
well young sir,  rtk | 04/05/08
Fortunately for me  Ole Man | 04/06/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  ashu.mittal@... | 04/04/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  hgewirtz@... | 04/04/08
Try...  jamesrayg | 04/04/08
promises to pick winning lottery numbers  Ole Man | 04/05/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  mygazee@... | 04/04/08
Snowball Effect  Randy Smith | 04/05/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  Anarchaotical | 04/05/08
oops.  Anarchaotical | 04/05/08
Too bad!  Ole Man | 04/05/08
Move on, M$  Shazzalive | 04/05/08
Still running Win2K pro..  mnottfam@... | 04/05/08
windows 7  cameljockey | 04/05/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  russc@... | 04/05/08
So you're running a beta build? lol  J242 | 04/05/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  J242 | 04/06/08
blissfully unaware..... an important new phrase  Ole Man | 04/06/08
lol  J242 | 04/07/08
I totally agree  Ole Man | 04/07/08
RE: Vista SP1?  TRJ725 | 04/06/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  TheOriginalStonefingers | 04/06/08
Pick a couple of bullet points and create an article based on speculation  pounder_arthur@... | 04/06/08
Everything we have done is bring the World to you; even in a pink and blue"  rtirman37@... | 04/07/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  rdawson@... | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  jlafitte | 04/08/08
You so realize that  rtk | 04/08/08
some screenshots ?  llval@... | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  legamin@... | 04/08/08
Every new version seems to lose some important feature  Emilio_z | 04/08/08
Not that it'll matter to you  rtk | 04/08/08
So, isn't the sort of the pattern?  bill@... | 04/08/08
Couple of modifications.  rtk | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  bill@... | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  bill@... | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  bill@... | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  bill@... | 04/08/08
RE: Windows 7: The delivery-date speculation continues  JackZhao@... | 04/08/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here