On GameSpot: $299 PS3 Slim and price cut announced!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 5th, 2006

Mac Office compatibility: When 'no comment' just isn't good enough

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 9:59 am

Categories: App Compatibility, Office, Office 2007

Tags:

Reports are cropping up all over that users of older versions of Microsoft's Office for Mac suite cannot exchange documents created with the new Microsoft Office 2007 suite for Windows, due to file-format incompatibilities.

The Mac Business Unit has promised that it will provide converters — that sound similar to the compatibility pack that Microsoft already has made available for Office 2003 users, enabling them to read documents in the new Office 2007 file formats. But, the Mac BU folks are declining to provide any kind of information on when these converters will arrive.

(Update: Microsoft released its converter timetable at the end of day on December 5. The Office for Mac file-format converters will be released in late March/early April 2007, according to the company.)

APC Magazine quotes a Microsoft Mac BU spokeswoman as saying "Unfortunately it is still to early for us to say when the converters will be available."

Sometimes, a no comment is just not acceptable. In my opinion, this is one of those times.

Microsoft made the Office 2007 bits available to business customers on November 30. That means, as of last week, there is a subset of Microsoft customers who are creating, saving and sharing documents using the new "Open XML" file formats that are now the default in Office 2007.

I put in a query to the Office for Windows team to see if they might be a little more forthcoming regarding the Mac-Office converter timing. That team sent my request back to the Mac BU PR team.

There also is no new information on the Microsoft Mac BU blog on Microsoft's plans to remedy the situation.

One thing we do know: Microsoft has said it expects to ship the next version of Mac Office six to eight months after Office 2007. Based on how Microsoft is counting, that could mean any time starting in May 2007. Hopefully, Mac Office users won't have to wait until then for the promised file converters.

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 43 Talkback(s)
RE: Mac Office compatibility: When 'no comment' just isn't good enough
TOD Converter,
VOB Converter for Mac,
... (Read the rest)
Posted by: hqconverter Posted on: 04/09/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
This is all about dirty tricks and competition. We  DonnieBoy | 12/05/06
Say what???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/05/06
He, Mozilla figured it out a long time ago. The deliver on all platforms at  DonnieBoy | 12/05/06
Rising Safari Usage  Moosehouse | 12/05/06
Microsoft is down to arround 80% in market share now. Not something that MS  DonnieBoy | 12/05/06
MS Should Be Nervous  EBathory | 12/06/06
Another example of being forced  Linux User 147560 | 12/05/06
MS had better be carefull. The easiest way to read/write all formats might  DonnieBoy | 12/05/06
Forced how???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/05/06
So is the new format necessary? Seems like the Fox is watching the chicken  DonnieBoy | 12/05/06
Just use Mac logic and it is all okay  NonZealot | 12/05/06
*shakes head*  Stuka | 12/05/06
Check your facts  NonZealot | 12/05/06
wrong  Stuka | 12/05/06
OSX is the only OS Apple ever made?  NonZealot | 12/05/06
hmm  Stuka | 12/05/06
Does it hurt to be so wrong?  NonZealot | 12/05/06
0/4?  Stuka | 12/05/06
Quite naive!  NonZealot | 12/05/06
WinZealot lies, yet again.  Rick_K | 12/05/06
Making fun of YOU!! HAHAHA!!!  NonZealot | 12/05/06
More of WinZealot's lies  Rick_K | 12/05/06
Nope  NonZealot | 12/05/06
It's hard to explain  Rick_K | 12/05/06
Correction  Rick_K | 12/05/06
Sure can  NonZealot | 12/05/06
You won't let things like Facts  Rick_K | 12/05/06
My facts are better than your FUD  NonZealot | 12/05/06
RE: It's hard to explain  Badgered | 12/06/06
I'm not siding with MS but  DemonX | 12/05/06
Ah hem...  Badgered | 12/05/06
Just use NeoOffice if you can  FirstNLastN | 12/05/06
I have to ask  mdemuth | 12/05/06
Naw, NotePad is better.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/05/06
Really sad  mosborne | 12/05/06
Just Thinking  Moosehouse | 12/05/06
Just Mary-Jo  Moosehouse | 12/05/06
Redmond  Moosehouse | 12/05/06
Office 2003? Older? Which version??  Predrag Vasic | 12/05/06
We use both Office X and Office 2001 with no problem  j.m.galvin | 12/05/06
Where did you get 80%  Moosehouse | 12/05/06
'no comment' just isn't good enough  Ole Man | 12/16/06
RE: Mac Office compatibility: When 'no comment' just isn't good enough  hqconverter | 04/09/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More