On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 22nd, 2009

Microsoft blames netbook appeal, marketing costs for Windows drop

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 8:02 am

Categories: Corporate strategy, Vista, Windows 7, Windows XP, Windows client

Tags: Revenue, OEM, Microsoft Corp., Netbook, Marketing Expense, Microsoft Windows, Netbooks, Nettops & MIDs, Sales Strategy, Marketing Research, Operating Systems

Microsoft’s planned layoff of 5,000 employees over the next 18 months is what most company watchers are focused on today. But performance of the Windows client division is also sure to be under the microscope, too.

For the three months ending December 31, 2008, client revenue was down eight percent, compared to theĀ  same quarter a year ago. OEM revenue — the money Microsoft earns by charging its PC maker partners a set amount for each copy of Windows they preload on new systems — was down $465 million, or 12 percent. OEM license units were down one percent, according to the company.

From Microsoft’s 10-Q filing on January 22:

“The decline in OEM revenue reflects an 11 percentage point decrease in the OEM premium mix to 64%, primarily driven by growth of licenses related to sales of netbook PCs, as well as changes in the geographic and product mixes. Revenue from commercial and retail licensing of Windows operating systems increased $113 million or 19%. Based on our estimates, total worldwide PC shipments from all sources was approximately flat, driven by increased demand in emerging markets, offset by decreased demand in mature markets.”

I am seeing some folks speculate that Microsoft’s sales of Windows PCs at retail are what dragged down Windows client. But based on the statement above, that is not the case. It is more about the growing percentage of netbooks, for which Microsoft is collecting some amount less-per-copy for Windows than it does with full-fledged notebooks and PCs.

Many netbooks cannot run Vista, due to its higher resource requirements. But as Microsoft has demonstrated, they will be able to run a full copy of Windows 7. Microsoft is raking in from its OEMs less-per-copy for XP than Vista. What’s unknown at this point is how much less it will charge PC makers to preload Windows 7 on a netbook vs. a notebook.

The other force dragging down Windows client, from the income side, was increased sales and marketing expenses. From the aforementioned 10-Q:

“Client operating income decreased primarily reflecting decreased revenue and increased sales and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased $80 million or 19%, primarily reflecting increased advertising and marketing campaigns.”

Microsoft spent an estimated $300 million for its “Windows Without Walls” print/online/TV ad campaign, which kicked off at the end of last year.

See also:

Larry Dignan: Netbooks are disruptive and wreaking havoc in the industry

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 68 Talkback(s)
Still, why does MS have to reduce the price of Windows for Netbooks if the
competition is absolute crap? Why is there 20% Linux penetration on Netbooks, even with MS practically giving away XP for Netbooks?... (Read the rest)
Posted by: DonnieBoy Posted on: 02/16/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Arrogance takes the blame  HollywoodDog | 01/22/09
Crap Music Player?  GuidingLight | 01/22/09
Is today your last day? (nt)  n0neXn0ne | 01/22/09
Nah they'll get rid of technology talent first,  Amelioration | 01/25/09
The Zune is OK.  Bruizer | 01/22/09
Shill  Jim4Prez | 01/23/09
Arrogance : "will be able to run a full copy of Windows 7"  Amelioration | 01/25/09
Note to Microsoft: Windows may be "elastic"  Roque Mocan | 01/22/09
2009 could prove how far consumer patience stretches. B-doiiing!! (nt)  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 01/22/09
Microsoft faces a future of increasingly competing with "free" ...  George Mitchell | 01/22/09
So far, "free crap" just don't cut it.  transposeIT | 01/22/09
"Free Crap"  lordshipmayhem | 01/25/09
I can name an advantage Windows has over Linux.  Amelioration | 01/25/09
Blue screens  de-void | 01/26/09
Still, why does MS have to reduce the price of Windows for Netbooks if the  DonnieBoy | 02/16/09
Flip the Coin  mrjoctave@... | 01/23/09
Assuming that the desktop stays as relevant  Amelioration | 01/25/09
I feel sorry for Microsoft.  Amelioration | 01/25/09
Win7 likely to be the cause of Client's 8% drop ...  de-void | 01/22/09
Its amazing...  storm14k | 01/22/09
Amazing indeed  de-void | 01/22/09
Stability.  Amelioration | 01/25/09
Profiting from human ignorance, stupidity and hopelessness  Amelioration | 01/25/09
MS has Winows XP  JABBER_WOLF | 01/22/09
In theory.  TripleII | 01/22/09
XP runs extremely well in a vacuum.  Amelioration | 01/25/09
Are OSX sales down too?  boed | 01/22/09
OS X is going great  Ken_z | 01/22/09
OUCH! Wash. unemployment pays well.  HollywoodDog | 01/22/09
How will all of this impact us?  daileyml | 01/22/09
It's about not downgrading to Vista.  bjbrock | 01/22/09
RE: Microsoft blames netbook appeal, marketing costs for Windows drop  just ask | 01/22/09
Agreed - for the most part  boed | 01/22/09
For companies, upgrade may not be an incremental cost  hamobu | 01/22/09
M$ is deluding themselves.  Ronin1 | 01/23/09
Oh, yeah, it's the netbooks.  Henrik Moller | 01/22/09
And the world is choosing Linux? Not yet.  Boxarox | 01/22/09
My mom's basement?  Henry Miller | 01/22/09
Microsoft Formula 1 Team  Amelioration | 01/25/09
But Linux IS eating Microsoft's lunch!  George Mitchell | 01/22/09
I would put it even more bluntly  Alan(UK) | 01/23/09
Utter nonsense  de-void | 01/23/09
Utter nonsense  Alan(UK) | 01/23/09
I certainly hope so! (nt)  Ronin1 | 01/23/09
The cost of the OS is practically negligible  de-void | 01/26/09
"Windows-compatible skills"  Amelioration | 01/25/09
2 year?  T1Oracle | 01/23/09
Only the begining  Eduardo_z | 01/22/09
It's not as unlikely as you think.  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 01/22/09
That would truly be a mistake.  TripleII | 01/22/09
OK not exactly sure what you mean - new money?  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 01/23/09
We are basically agreeing.  TripleII | 01/24/09
RE: WinCE  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 01/24/09
Windows Mobile is built on WinCE  de-void | 01/26/09
If Win 7 is not a resource hog like Vista  Ronin1 | 01/23/09
Couldn't Ballmer & execs take a 1% pay cut...  olePigeon | 01/22/09
Employed doing what?  vikingnyc@... | 01/23/09
Not enough, Microsoft engineers are paid fairly well  balsover | 01/23/09
RE: Microsoft blames netbook appeal, marketing costs for Windows drop  lattefun@... | 01/23/09
ROI  carrilion | 01/23/09
Sorry, but no!  de-void | 01/23/09
Attract and Retain Top Talent  carrilion | 01/23/09
Marketing?  seanferd | 01/23/09
RE: Microsoft blames netbook appeal, marketing costs for Windows drop  Ronin1 | 01/23/09
RE: Microsoft blames netbook appeal, marketing costs for Windows drop  atari8bit@... | 01/24/09
RE: Microsoft blames netbook appeal, marketing costs for Windows drop  John Biles | 01/24/09
Microsoft blames.........  Ole Man | 01/25/09
Linux is coming.  MarkyGoldstein | 01/26/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here