On BNET: Send self-destructing email
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 12th, 2009

Will Microsoft port Windows to an Arm-based OLPC laptop?

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 2:44 pm

Categories: App Compatibility, Corporate strategy, Windows 7, Windows Mobile, Windows XP, Windows client

Tags: ARM, Microsoft Corp., Laptop Computer, One Laptop Per Child Project, Arm, Microsoft Windows, Operating Systems, Software, Mary Jo Foley

One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) chief Nicholas Negroponte is hinting that the project is leaning strongly toward dumping x86 processors in favor of lower-power Arm-based ones for the next-generation XO-2 laptops. There’s one problem: At least as Arm and Windows currently exist, a full version of Windows is unlikely to load on an Arm-based machine.

From a report on the Good Gear Guide (which I saw via OSnews):

“As with the XO-1, OLPC wants to offer a dual-boot option on XO-2 where users can choose to load either Linux or a full Windows OS. While Arm processors can run Windows Mobile operating systems, they can’t run a full Windows OS.

“‘Like many, we are urging Microsoft to make Windows — not Windows Mobile — available on the Arm. This is a complex question for them,’ Negroponte said.”

According to the article, the OLPC is in talks with Microsoft to make a full version of Windows available for the XO-2s, which are still 18 months or so away from release.

I asked Microsoft about the report and received the following statement from a spokesperson:

“At this point in time, Microsoft’s plan is to offer a quality Windows experience on the current XO device and have no further information. Microsoft is not commenting on any future plans with regard to OLPC, nor does it comment on speculation.”

I also asked if Negroponte’s characterization of discussions with Microsoft was accurate. No word back on that one.

In the past, deciphering Microsoft’s intentions regarding OLPC has been a complex task. Typically,

1. OLPC chief Nicolas Negroponte publicly announces what Microsoft will or won’t do
2. Microsoft declines to comment
3. Microsoft subsequently decides to comment and often contradicts Negroponte’s claims
4. Microsoft ends up doing, to a large extent, what Negroponte said it would

What do you think will happen with the XO-2, given MIcrosoft’s growing interest in making WIndows available in developing countries? Will Microsoft find a way to port some version of Windows to Arm? Will the Softies make Windows Mobile its default on Arm-based laptops? Other thoughts?

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 108 Talkback(s)
Arm and MS
"
Linux applications, and Linux is a full OS.

Microsoft is in big trouble if Arm gets hot for netbooks, especially if Google makes a killer version of Android for 10 to 12 inch screens."
... (Read the rest)
Posted by: bklooste Posted on: 06/02/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Doubtfull.  ShadeTree | 03/12/09
They probably have a skunkworks though.  TripleII | 03/12/09
It's called Windows Mobile/WindowsCE  TheWerewolf | 03/12/09
Linux will win hands down against Windows Mobile/CE. There are a lot more  DonnieBoy | 03/12/09
Oooohhhh...MS is shaking in its boots...Great post Mr. Paige...  transposeIT | 03/12/09
Maybe not shaking in their boots...  Michael Kelly | 03/13/09
Linux forced MS to give away XP for the netbook platform.  DonnieBoy | 03/13/09
$7 Solution  mswift@... | 03/13/09
@mswift - Think of the poor shareholders for cryin out loud...  storm14k | 03/14/09
If Linux is so good, why can't they give it away?  de-void | 04/07/09
MS already owns 90% of computer shoppers brains  T1Oracle | 04/08/09
Android still has a lot of growing up to do  Michael Kelly | 03/13/09
I'm not sure they lack all that you describe...  storm14k | 03/13/09
I know it's not a major technical challenge  Michael Kelly | 03/13/09
What I was getting at...  storm14k | 03/13/09
Arm and MS  bklooste | 06/02/09
NT was originally built on MIPS, and then on x86, Alpha and PowerPC  de-void | 03/13/09
hello  jdbukis@... | 03/14/09
No.  de-void | 04/07/09
They've actually had/have several!  de-void | 04/07/09
Yup.  Sleeper Service | 03/13/09
In Taiwan they will make money on it, but no lunch for m$.  InAction Man | 03/14/09
Applications anyone?  DotNetPgmr | 03/12/09
Those x86 apps will run on the cloud. The clients will be Arm devices  InAction Man | 03/14/09
x86 apps will live in the cloud. Clients will be Arm devices.  InAction Man | 03/14/09
God I hope not.  TheWerewolf | 03/12/09
Intel Atom  shadfurman | 03/12/09
The biggest problem with x86 ...  de-void | 03/13/09
Nonsense.  de-void | 03/13/09
Three-way split  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/12/09
not just olpc  Eduardo_z | 03/12/09
no  shadfurman | 03/12/09
It is not just OLPC, there will be other netbooks that use ARM. Nvidia,  DonnieBoy | 03/12/09
naw  shadfurman | 03/12/09
Still, the only way that MS could hold off Linux was with a nearly free  DonnieBoy | 03/13/09
Um, that's 90% in less than a year? happy  wolf_z | 03/13/09
Yep, and it forced MS to bring back an 8 year old OS and give it away.  DonnieBoy | 03/13/09
MS aren't giving XP away  de-void | 03/13/09
The definition of hurt.  TripleII | 03/13/09
Sorry, TripleII, I found some errors in the "math"  GuidingLight | 03/13/09
@TripleII - 435M? That's 1/4 of one day of gross revenue  de-void | 03/17/09
(laughing hysterically)  wolf_z | 03/13/09
Bozo would laugh like that too!  InAction Man | 03/14/09
@ InactionMan  wolf_z | 03/15/09
Not at all.  GuidingLight | 03/13/09
The very best laugh of the day.  TripleII | 03/13/09
How soon they have forgotten...  storm14k | 03/14/09
And if they can't get an iPhone with windoze they'll purchase a competing  InAction Man | 03/14/09
No way  CobraA1 | 03/12/09
So, if that is true, and Arm netbooks are hot, MS is in deep sheeeet.  DonnieBoy | 03/12/09
You also said that before MS get into Netbooks and look who's dominating...  transposeIT | 03/12/09
exactly!  shadfurman | 03/12/09
Dominating, at the expense of having to give away XP, AND  DonnieBoy | 03/13/09
You say that so proudly...  wolf_z | 03/13/09
Look at it the other way. Windows has almost zero value against Linux in th  DonnieBoy | 03/13/09
You contradict yourself!  de-void | 03/13/09
@de-void  TripleII | 03/13/09
Look at it the other way Linux has almost zero value against Windows  GuidingLight | 03/13/09
They aren't giving it away  wolf_z | 03/13/09
@GL ...value...  n0neXn0ne | 03/13/09
@TripleII : While I appreciate your enthusiasm ...  de-void | 03/16/09
Re; Linux still clings to 10% marketshare!  hkommedal | 03/14/09
no IFs, they are in deep...  InAction Man | 03/14/09
dude  jdbukis@... | 03/14/09
ARM is not going to kill x86 anytime soon, but  hkommedal | 03/14/09
Of course they will react  InAction Man | 03/14/09
Re; I doubt they will see much success. Do not EVER  hkommedal | 03/14/09
You assume too much  de-void | 03/16/09
Not really...  logicearth@... | 03/13/09
Just need a good C/C++ compiler  wolf_z | 03/13/09
Or perhaps like Microsoft's C++ compilers for x86, x64, Itanium and ARM  de-void | 03/13/09
FAIL  de-void | 03/13/09
I have "a funny feeling" that Windows can easily be  hkommedal | 03/14/09
Why do you dislike DRM?  de-void | 03/17/09
Close but not quite right  mikegalos@... | 03/15/09
You're right ...  de-void | 03/17/09
RE: Will Microsoft port Windows to an Arm-based OLPC laptop?  Eduardo_z | 03/12/09
RE: Will Microsoft port Windows to an Arm-based OLPC laptop?  shadfurman | 03/12/09
That is a good idea. It does need a few modifications though.  hkommedal | 03/14/09
RE: Will Microsoft port Windows to an Arm-based OLPC laptop?  shadfurman | 03/12/09
If MS kills DRM in a ARM recompile, then they could get the upper hand.  hkommedal | 03/14/09
Well it will depend  timiteh | 03/13/09
If Microsoft was open-source this wouldn't be an issue  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 03/13/09
What do you think Microsoft are doing?  de-void | 03/13/09
Obviously they do have their thumbs up their a$$es  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 03/14/09
Right...becaue x64 and Itanium are really x86 platforms  logicearth@... | 03/14/09
RE: Reliant on x86 features  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 03/14/09
Close, but no cigar ...  de-void | 03/16/09
Yeah, sorry I'd completely forgotten the Itanium.  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 03/17/09
@Custard_over_2x_Pie: Yeah, Itanium still lives  de-void | 03/17/09
Itanium is a completely different beast to x86/x64  de-void | 03/16/09
Actually ... they obviously DON'T!  de-void | 03/16/09
RE: MinWin  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 03/17/09
Suspend resume is ALREADY part of the NT kernel  de-void | 03/17/09
Cheap stunt by Negroponte  croberts | 03/13/09
A-Men  DannyO_0x98 | 03/14/09
RE: Will Microsoft port Windows to an Arm-based OLPC laptop?  Loverock Davidson | 03/13/09
Even if MS doesn't port Windows  terry flores | 03/13/09
m$ is in deep shite  InAction Man | 03/14/09
lol  jdbukis@... | 03/14/09
Power PC is the past ARM is the future, there's the difference.  InAction Man | 03/14/09
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight  de-void | 03/17/09
50 million: It's a numbers game  rosanlo | 03/13/09
Remember... the Bill Gates Foundation.  pcguy777 | 03/13/09
What's the point then?  DotNetPgmr | 03/14/09
OLPC is Dead anyway....  dunn@... | 03/16/09
at some point Windows mobile will merge with Windows...  marees | 03/16/09
ARM is good  QuimaxW | 03/18/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here