On TV.com: 2009's Most PIRATED TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

October 4th, 2006

What Microsoft still isn't saying about WGA and Volume Activation 2.0

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 6:09 am

Categories: Anti-piracy, Vista, WGA, Windows Server 2008/ Windows Server Longhorn, Windows client, Windows server

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Vista, WGA

Microsoft lifted the veil – sort of – about its Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) and Volume Activation 2.0 plans for Windows Vista and Longhorn Server on October 4.

I say “sort of” because Microsoft is providing publicly little more than bare-bones details about these technologies and how they’ll figure in its next-generation products.

We already knew that Microsoft intended to embed WGA throughout Vista. Company officials told users and partners this earlier this year. But now we know how. If your copy of Vista does not pass Microsoft’s anti-piracy sniff test, you won’t be able to use the Aero user interface, Windows Defender anti-spyware and ReadyBoost memory-expanding technologies that will be built into the premium versions of Vista. (Will other Vista elements, like Vista Ultimate Extras, get the WGA lock-down? The Softies had no comment when I asked.)

On the Volume Activation 2.0 front, Microsoft is going to step-up its anti-piracy authentication requirements for businesses with Vista and Longhorn Server, as some testers have said. Businesses running Windows Vista Business, Vista Enterprise and the Longhorn Server SKUs (due out in the latter part of 2007) will be required to track product-license keys via two schemes: Multiple Activation Keys (MAK), which are aimed at smaller organizations and/or isolated machines; and on-premise volume license key-management service (KMS) for networked environments with 25 or more machines. Again, we knew that much already.

There are also some WGA and Volume Activation 2.0 myths that Microsoft is out to debunk, officials said. If a Vista machine doesn’t pass WGA or Volume Activation 2.0 muster, Microsoft cannot and will not “shut it off,” officials said. (If you fail to activate Vista in 30 days, however, it sounds like your Internet access is shut down after an hour. Sure sounds like a "kill" switch by any other name.) Additionally, Volume Activation has no links to billing, the Softies say. If you install 4,000 Vista clients and pay for 3,000 under Volume Licensing 2.0, Microsoft won’t be sending you a bill for the missing 1,000 product keys, officials insisted.

With those caveats, what are some of the WGA and Volume Activation 2.0 aspects that are not common knowledge – but about which Microsoft watchers still might want to know? Here’s my short list:

Q: Microsoft is describing WGA and Volume Activation 2.0 as part of its “Software Protection Platform.” What else is in this grab bag?

A: The Software Protection Platform, according to a Microsoft Volume Activation 2.0 FAQ that I saw recently, includes the following: “An Activation Service, client services and API that ship in Vista, and tools and technologies designed to better protect software through stronger security measures.” What kinds of code-protection technologies are we talking? “Code protection technologies such as tamper resistance, code obfuscation, and anti-reverse engineering measures have been considerably strengthened for Vista. The SP Platform has enabled Vista to improve software security, including new product activation technologies and policies for Retail, Volume, and OEM customers.”

(They’re talking about Windows Anytime Upgrade here – which is Microsoft’s plan to allow users to upgrade pricier Vista SKUs, using a combination of a disc and an online activation code.)

Q: Which versions of Windows are going to include Volume Licensing support?

A: According to the Microsoft Volume Activation 2.0 FAQ, the following versions will be Volume Activation 2.0-ready:

* Vista Business

* Vista Business N (the EU version without Media Player)

* Vista Business K (the Korean version with links to third-party products)

* Vista Business KN (the Korean version without Media Player and Messenger)

* Vista Enterprise

* Vista Enterprise K (the Korean version with links to third-party products)

* Longhorn Server Itanium Edition

* Longhorn Server Web

* Longhorn Server Computer Cluster

* Windows Midmarket Server (MAK only) 

* Windows Midmarket Server Premium (MAK only) 

* Longhorn Server Standard/Standard Core

* Longhorn Server Enterprise/Enterprise Core

* Longhorn Server Datacenter/Datacenter Core

Q: There are rumblings that Microsoft intends to back-port Volume Activation 2.0 to Windows Server 2003. Is there any truth to that?

A: There will be a Key Management Service (KMS) that will be available for Windows Server 2003, acknowledged Thomas Lindeman, senior product manager for Microsoft’s Software Protection Platform. Expect it in the spring of 2007, he said. Because KMS is a server-driven service, Microsoft is adding Windows Server to its list of covered platforms so companies who don’t have Vista or Longhorn Server servers can make use of it.

Q: We know Microsoft is going to lock down Vista and Longhorn Server. What other products are going to be “protected” by the Software Protection Platform?

A: “All Microsoft products will eventually use the Software Protection Platform,” said Cori Hartje, director of Microsoft’s Genuine Software Initiative. Flight Simulator X, which went gold in mid-September, includes WGA elements. Expect future versions of SQL Server and Exchange Server to be among the next products to require Volume Activation 2.0, Hartje said.

Q: Microsoft also is claiming that some third-party-developed products are going to become part of the WGA/Volume Activation 2.0 fold. Which ones and when?

A: Hartje said Microsoft had nothing to say about its plans to extend its Software Protection Platform to non-Microsoft products. But were’s what the Volume Activation 2.0 FAQ had to say:

“Looking forward, it (Volume Activation 2.0) will provide the basis for an easy-to-use, comprehensive, integrated activation process that will support both Microsoft's and third-party applications.”

Q: Testers I’ve talked to are not too thrilled about the systems-management headaches they believe will result from Volume Activation 2.0. They just see it as yet another service they’re going to have to administer. What’s Microsoft’s response?

A: Microsoft is readying a bunch of new Volume Activation 2.0 deployment guides, Hartje said, as well as new management tools designed to help admins keep better track of their volume-license keys. Among the new tools are a forthcoming Microsoft Operations Manager pack and add-ons to Systems Management Server, officials said.

What else do you want to know about Microsoft’s Vista WGA and Volume Activation 2.0 plans for Vista and beyond? 

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 159 Talkback(s)
J EN
FAT UGLY NEVER GOSE FOR A BATH SMELLIN (Read the rest)
Posted by: AUDREY T Posted on: 03/01/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
This is a nightmare waiting to happen...  BitTwiddler | 10/04/06
Not a problem  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/04/06
Not a problem unless ...  spamagnet | 10/04/06
Incorrect  WinnebagoBoy | 10/05/06
Actually...  Rick_K | 10/06/06
WGA will fail  trashmem@... | 10/04/06
What No Smart Linux Comments Yet?  blkadder | 10/04/06
yeah Linux  morndue | 10/04/06
Nothing to do with Linux  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/04/06
Huh?  spamagnet | 10/04/06
Oh alright!  bportlock | 10/04/06
Linux 27 years ago  skykingoh | 10/06/06
Felt compelled to check,  skykingoh | 10/06/06
no need for comments  zoroaster | 10/04/06
Linux For Me  Ole Man | 10/04/06
Litigation strategy  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/04/06
The Answer Is No Longer "Yes"  Cardhu | 10/04/06
The Real Fun Would Begin  Cardhu | 10/04/06
Yet Another Linux Tirade (YAST)  Marc_O'Polo | 10/04/06
ummm...shouldn't that be YALT? nt  mdsmedia | 10/05/06
see George Ou  Eduardo_z | 10/04/06
Not Quite  mypl8s4u2 | 10/05/06
Smart Linux Comment  ksarkies | 10/05/06
Amazing, isn't it?  mdsmedia | 10/05/06
NO, it's you who need to get a grip  ebrke | 10/05/06
Check the other post on the topic  crayolakidd | 10/06/06
The more you tighten your grip, Microsoft ...  spamagnet | 10/04/06
You make a valid point....  bportlock | 10/04/06
Never mind the sysadmins  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/04/06
Interesting view you have of sysadmins  maldain | 10/04/06
Encapsulation  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/04/06
Great statement  oregonjohn | 10/04/06
Lookin to close you DOWN....  mypl8s4u2 | 10/05/06
sys admin/cio  lotta_anger | 10/05/06
WGA on Server 2003 ?  skiplarson | 10/04/06
Bad enough...  wizzzer | 10/04/06
Why did you do that?  John Zern | 10/04/06
Uh...  zoroaster | 10/04/06
Well, We Know Why We're Doing It  Cardhu | 10/04/06
already working on it  exchange | 10/05/06
Non-Networked Stand-Alone PC  tazinfo@... | 10/04/06
How will activation work?  Resuna | 10/04/06
USS Yorktown, 1988  spamagnet | 10/04/06
Divide by zero!  spamagnet | 10/04/06
RE: Divide by Zero  mypl8s4u2 | 10/05/06
I'm Waiting For the Microsoft Apologists  Cardhu | 10/04/06
pick up that phone ...  zoroaster | 10/04/06
I'm not sure what you mean by "secure environment"  Cardhu | 10/04/06
well...  zoroaster | 10/04/06
No, Handling Classified Material Is Not Relevant Here  Cardhu | 10/04/06
I guess you missed the last VA report  mypl8s4u2 | 10/05/06
...And talk to a Non-English speaking 3rd worlder  wjgrimm | 10/05/06
New Attack Mode?  tazinfo@... | 10/04/06
The more complex the machinery ...  spamagnet | 10/04/06
Black hat conference  mypl8s4u2 | 10/05/06
One scenario could be ...  strubinsky@... | 10/05/06
Glad I've got kernel source...  Resuna | 10/04/06
WGA & OS products  null | 10/04/06
Microsoft  bb1040 | 10/04/06
I quite agree with you  maldain | 10/04/06
Oops, a newbie!  Media-Ted@... | 10/04/06
WGA  scooke_z | 10/04/06
totally agree with Scooke_z  mypl8s4u2 | 10/05/06
Ooooh that's so cool!  strubinsky@... | 10/05/06
Microsoft needs to focus on other areas  Sxooter_z | 10/04/06
Why is MS sinking itself into a mire?  dayjm | 10/04/06
They're not sinking...  zoroaster | 10/04/06
The mire  lederhoden | 10/05/06
This is nuts!  VonHelton | 10/04/06
What Pirates?  Media-Ted@... | 10/04/06
WGA and WS 2003  Mary Jo FoleyZDNet Moderator | 10/04/06
WGA DRM and whatever  rastaub | 10/04/06
Everyone knows ...  zoroaster | 10/04/06
Don't see the big deal  inconsequential | 10/04/06
take time to read the posts  zoroaster | 10/04/06
Well, You Could Read Up And See Why Others Are Concerned  Cardhu | 10/04/06
Utter nonsense  cnfrisch | 10/04/06
Pot and Kettle, Carey  gwrigg | 10/05/06
I Am Concerned  Cardhu | 10/19/06
Kind of like...  Rick_K | 10/06/06
Frisch Provides No References, No Substantiation  Cardhu | 10/19/06
Ahh yes, but before your flame me...  inconsequential | 10/05/06
I think your post is more of a flame  Cardhu | 10/19/06
The Litmus Test  Cardhu | 10/19/06
WGA, DRM, VolAct2 will KILL your VISTA PC  rh0 | 10/04/06
@You Stupid  harrisharris | 10/04/06
M$ tried this crap earlier; I didn't buy into it then either  Old Timer 8080 | 10/04/06
the megalomania lives on underneath  Castanet | 10/04/06
The BIG Picture  roborodder | 10/05/06
Activation is a guilty until proven innocent protection scheme.  jjarman | 10/05/06
THE REAL PROBLEM  jchap100321@... | 10/05/06
Just do away with selling hard copies of windows  Randall Lind | 10/05/06
Larry E is an idiot.  wizzzer | 10/05/06
Re: Just do away with selling hard copies of windows  cdavis1_2005@... | 10/05/06
It could be done if MS wanted to...  David Cowell | 10/07/06
GREED = M$  Dr_Zinj | 10/05/06
How I dealt with Windows Vista  Mitch 74 | 10/05/06
I'm hiring experts from here!  derekgore | 10/05/06
BTW  derekgore | 10/05/06
Full Of Crap  Ole Man | 10/08/06
Erecting A Strawman Just To Stab At It  Cardhu | 10/18/06
death to vista  cwhull | 10/05/06
AMEN TO THAT  cwhull | 10/05/06
wrong  cwhull | 10/05/06
Specifically?  derekgore | 10/05/06
Addendum:  derekgore | 10/05/06
Typo  derekgore | 10/05/06
Vista has almost COMPLETELY lost hope of profits from the C-C  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
How rude of me to forget the C-C  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Juscarmi . . . What?  derekgore | 10/05/06
Typos sorry  derekgore | 10/05/06
The challenge . . .For real  derekgore | 10/05/06
The beginning of hiring  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
I agree with parts  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
The bet?  derekgore | 10/05/06
Windows XP - The ultimate torture. Vista -The ultimate experience. torture?  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Christmas Turkey  Ole Man | 10/08/06
Windows NT 4.0 - The Answer  milpo2717@... | 10/05/06
Windows 2000  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Anybody else notice?  derekgore | 10/05/06
An exciting offer  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
WAIT! I TAKE THAT BACK!  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Perfect code, how to create?  derekgore | 10/05/06
antivirus is my start  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Thanks  derekgore | 10/05/06
Sure, why not  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Invalid?  derekgore | 10/05/06
You Create BS  Ole Man | 10/08/06
Next questions  derekgore | 10/05/06
Dodgy validation from a GENUINE version  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Paying money for XP is clearly not an investment.  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Want to fix the problem or fix the blame?  derekgore | 10/05/06
Or  derekgore | 10/05/06
Or  derekgore | 10/05/06
The Perfect Code  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
More good ideas  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Fixing is the best way  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
You should already have bud!  derekgore | 10/05/06
But not one minute more  derekgore | 10/05/06
Typo on the email addy?  derekgore | 10/05/06
If you have email or privacy issues  derekgore | 10/05/06
Whooops.  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Most certainly a deal  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Domination  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
AND  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Haven't helped you yet  derekgore | 10/05/06
11:10 PM here  derekgore | 10/05/06
Thanks mate  Justin Carmichael | 10/05/06
Just resent email  derekgore | 10/05/06
Got your email!  derekgore | 10/05/06
Hanging in there  derekgore | 10/05/06
I think people are just plain worn out by all this  WinnebagoBoy | 10/05/06
wga 2.0  amj2006 | 10/05/06
Why I can't use Vista  snixon@... | 10/06/06
Pack of Knobs  Justin Carmichael | 10/06/06
Microsoft Genuine Windows Program  rjbrg123@... | 10/08/06
Message has been deleted.  myfevertoy | 10/22/06
Now Who In The World ...  Cardhu | 10/23/06
J EN  AUDREY T | 03/01/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here