On mySimon: Vosges Haut-Chocolat
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 16th, 2009

Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 6:42 am

Categories: Corporate strategy, Legal, Linux, Novell

Tags: NAS, Buffalo, Microsoft Corp., Patent Protection, Linux, Network-Attached Storage (NAS), UNIX, Operating Systems, Open Source, Software

After the Microsoft-TomTom patent-infringement squabble — settled by TomTom paying Microsoft an undisclosed sum — I was wondering whether Microsoft might be more successful in unearthing new partners to sign Linux patent-protection deals. The answer seems to be yes.

On July 15, Microsoft signed a patent-coverage deal with Melco Holdings, the Japanese-based parent company of Buffalo Inc. and Buffalo Group. Buffalo makes network-attached storage (NAS) and routers, including the LinkStation and AirStation products.

Microsoft and Melco “have entered into an agreement that will provide Melco Group’s customers with patent coverage for their use of industry-leading technologies running Linux and other related open source software,” according to Microsoft’s press release. More details from Microsoft:

“Specifically, the patent covenants apply to Buffalo-branded Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices, which run Linux, and Buffalo-branded routers, which also run Linux. Although the contents of the agreement have not been disclosed, the parties indicate that the only financial consideration in this agreement is royalties paid by Melco Group to Microsoft.”

Yet again, no official word whether Melco has agreed that its Linux wares are infringing on Microsoft patents. (I guess we’ll have to wait for Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to be that blunt, as he was, to Novell execs’ chagrin, when Microsoft and Novell signed a patent-protection deal in 2006.)

Here’s Buffalo’s statement, courtesy of Microsoft’s release:

“’We are very pleased to be able to work with Microsoft on this matter,’ said Hajime Nakai, director and member of the board at Buffalo. ‘While we plan to increasingly adopt Windows Storage Server for our NAS business, we also wanted to ensure that our open source and Linux-embedded devices had the appropriate IP protections. By collaborating with Microsoft on a practical business solution, we are able to provide our customers with the appropriate IP coverage, while also maintaining full compliance with our obligations under the GPLv2.’”

As those following Microsoft’s patent deals with Linux vendors may recall, the Softies have refused to provide IP protection for customers of Linux vendors uing the GNU General Public License v3.

I wonder which Linux OEM will be next to sign on Microsoft’s dotted line. I wonder, too, if Microsoft will ever go public with which of its patents it believes Linux violates. It hasn’t done so in the past three years, so I’m doubtful….

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 64 Talkback(s)
Got any evidence for that statement?
...

Didn't think so. (Read the rest)
Posted by: LeonBA Posted on: 09/18/09  (Edited: 09/18/09 @ 02:20) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
It's only news if ....  n0neXn0ne | 07/16/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  Loverock Davidson | 07/16/09
Which part of Linux  nucrash | 07/16/09
Loverock, you do know that Mike Cox is back, do you?  nizuse | 07/16/09
Where is he?  Viva la crank dodo | 07/16/09
Loverock FUD  Don Collins | 07/17/09
Then why the Tom-Tom deal?  bpatin@... | 07/17/09
Signed too quickly  daengbo | 07/17/09
Can somebody tell me ......  cammobus@... | 07/17/09
originally, this is true  DaemonSlayer | 07/17/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  jtollack@... | 07/17/09
Ha... In your wettest dreams...  awasson@... | 07/17/09
Allegation  DaemonSlayer | 07/17/09
absolutely right  maggietoo9 | 07/18/09
Spoken like someone taking a Microsoft paycheck  maggietoo9 | 07/18/09
Got any evidence for that statement?  LeonBA | 09/18/09
Novell gained in this matter  nucrash | 07/16/09
"The SCO Group"-pay us for protection!  DonRupertBitByte | 07/16/09
*** BREAKING NEWS ***  Dietrich T. Schmitz | 07/16/09
Bilsky is about business method patents. This was about technology patents  de-void | 07/16/09
UNSPECIFIED "enforcible" technology patents ...  George Mitchell | 07/16/09
Blackmail  Ole Man | 07/16/09
+ 1  DaemonSlayer | 07/17/09
Actually...  awasson@... | 07/17/09
Patent protection racket  Chalfont | 07/20/09
Old hat!  Ole Man | 07/16/09
True. True..Ole Man...Word.  Dietrich T. Schmitz | 07/16/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  Mah | 07/16/09
MS vs Linux  step69 | 07/16/09
There would...  Erroneous | 07/16/09
MS a monopoly?  step69 | 07/16/09
What about Google?  Tiggster | 07/16/09
Its amazing....  storm14k | 07/16/09
If you have a PC  maggietoo9 | 07/18/09
...what OS can you load? Answers  over2sd | 07/18/09
Apparently, you don't know the meaning of the word.  DeusExMachina | 07/18/09
Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  mrdt | 07/16/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  step69 | 07/16/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  jlasun | 07/16/09
Need the Mono folk any more evidence....  storm14k | 07/16/09
Mono is a positive for Linux  Tiggster | 07/16/09
The same old same old...  storm14k | 07/16/09
Ahahahahhahaha  jackbond | 07/16/09
You must be one of them...  storm14k | 07/16/09
Interesting ...  de-void | 07/17/09
Keep it in context  awasson@... | 07/17/09
Maybe you're just looking in the wrong places  eb276 | 07/16/09
I'm not talking about ASP.Net based sites...  storm14k | 07/16/09
Oh I see  eb276 | 07/16/09
I would hope they do...  storm14k | 07/16/09
After reading that.....  Erroneous | 07/16/09
Nope....  storm14k | 07/16/09
I see what yoru saying  cferriby | 07/17/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  step69 | 07/16/09
thought about buying a Buffalo router. now i'm positive i don't want one.:(  wessonjoe | 07/17/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  Grey Ash | 07/17/09
Microsquish products so weak they can only hope to win by bullying  Tom6 | 07/17/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  ceknight | 07/17/09
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft  adams484@... | 07/17/09
The school yard bully is trying to take kids lunches again He doesn't have  softwareFlunky | 07/17/09
mwahaha!  jedikitty@... | 07/17/09
No Mono is not positive with Linux  onetwothreemike | 07/18/09
Microsoft is disgusting  onetwothreemike | 07/18/09
the road Microsoft walks best  Ole Man | 07/29/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More