On mySimon: K2 Bliss Snowboard Binding
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 14th, 2009

Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 8:53 am

Categories: Corporate strategy, Office 2010/Office 14, Service Pack, Virtualization, Vista, Windows 7, Windows XP, Windows client

Tags: Microsoft Office, Microsoft Corp., Microsoft Windows 7, Microsoft Windows, Operating Systems, Software, Mary Jo Foley

Windows 7’s consumer launch is just over a month away. But there’s no reason business users should delay their Windows 7 deployment plans, according to the company.

To accentuate its point, Microsoft is rolling out the new version of the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack (MDOP) — a bunch of deployment-focused tools available to its volume licensees with Software Assurance contracts — months earlier than expected. Instead of holding up the new MDOP release until early 2010, as it originally planned, Microsoft is going to ship MDOP 2009 R2 at the end of October 2009 and then provide the updated MED-V virtualization tool to business users via a service pack once it is available in early 2010.

(MED-V is the application-virtualization software based on the Kidaro technology Microsoft acquired in 2008.)

Windows 7 is ready to deploy now. Enterprise customers don’t have to wait,” said Microsoft Senior Director Gavriella Schuster.

Microsoft made the final Windows 7 bits available to its business customers with volume licensing agreements starting in August.  Consumers who want the new OS preloaded on new PCs will have to wait until the general-availability date of October 22.

On September 14, the Windows team also released several new case studies about companies that have been part of Microsoft’s Windows 7 early-deployment programs. The idea is to prove that there are real and provable dollar and time savings for companies in moving to Windows 7 and MDOP. In other words, if they can do it, you can, too….

Microsoft execs are getting more forthright in admitting what numerous market researchers have found: Vista never really took hold with many corporate customers and Microsoft’s biggest challenge will be to convince budget-constrained enterprises that they should move off XP.

Schuster, with whom I had a chance to speak late last week, acknowledged that many IT pros have a lingering bad image of how difficult and costly it was to roll out XP to thousands of users.

“Back then, when we rolled out XP, IT managers had very few tools, just things like WAIK (Windows Automated Installation Kit) and WinPE,” she said.

But with Windows 7, there are lots of pre-deployment aids, deployment tools, virtualization tools and Solution Accelerator samples and guidance to make rolling out the new OS less of a chore, Schuster said.

What about companies which still believe that it’s unwise to move to a new operating-system release before Microsoft issues a Service Pack (SP) for it? Starting with Vista, Microsoft tried to convince corporate users that the old “wait for SP1″ adage was outdated (but bungled the way it attempted to do so, by refusing for months to say when and if Vista SP1 would arrive).

“We are trying to get the word out that Windows 7 is stable and the RC (Release Candidate test build) was really our gold image,” Schuster said. “Will everyone believe that? No. There will always be some customers who will want to wait for SP1.”

For now, Microsoft has no guidance for these customers as to when to expect the Windows 7 SP1, she said.

“We are still gearing up for our postmortems on Windows 7,” she said, “so we don’t have a plan in place yet for our SP1 rollout.”

What about those corporate customers who are interested in rolling out multiple Microsoft products simultaneously so that they don’t have to do two major upgrades — as would seemingly be required for customers who want both Windows 7 and Office 2010, which isn’t expected to ship until mid-2010?

Schuster had advice for those users, as well.

Users need to decide whether they plan to deploy Office 2010 across all their machines simultaneously, or whether they’ll do a staged release, using application virtualization, for example. Whichever way they decide, it’s not too early to kick the assessment and planning phase of their testing off now, she said, since hardware and application compatibility testing prior to the deployment of a new version of Windows typically takes companies six months or more.

“Operating system deployments take a lot of work,” Schuster acknowledged. “Users can start testing the hardware now and then decide whether they want to make Office 2010 part of their golden image or not later. You could decide to leave Office 2007 in your golden image, or put Office 2010 in using virtualization and then flip the scenario once you’re ready.”

Corporate users: What’s your take? Are you planning to kick off your Windows 7 deployment plans any time soon? Why or why not?

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 99 Talkback(s)
When 4GB is too little
My company has no plans on rolling out Win 7 to it's 300,000+ laptops anytime soon. We have looked at Vista and can't make a compelling case for that either.

I think at the end of the day the ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: azrieluk Posted on: 10/10/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I would bet  Michael Kelly | 09/14/09
Some will probably wait for SP1. It`s standard procedure  NeoGeneration | 09/14/09
I'm well aware of that  Michael Kelly | 09/14/09
My company has no plans to deploy Win 7  HollywoodDog | 09/14/09
Clients  jeremychappell | 09/14/09
Back compatibility......  Lester Young | 09/15/09
Great post.  CPPDEV | 09/15/09
Right on!  TheITStranger | 09/16/09
The problem is... this time the upgrade isn't worth it...  cosuna | 09/15/09
When 4GB is too little  azrieluk | 10/10/09
RE: Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now  Will.Conner | 09/14/09
Browser upgrade  linuser | 09/14/09
Windows 7 ships with IE 8.  ye | 09/14/09
IE 8 is not standards-compliant  linuser | 09/14/09
But  jdbukis@... | 09/14/09
Microsoft needs to get it done  linuser | 09/14/09
Well, they are a member of the W3C . . .  CobraA1 | 09/14/09
Why?  de-void | 09/14/09
Others have said all there is to say. nt  ye | 09/14/09
Acid3 is not a compliance test.  CobraA1 | 09/14/09
Acid3 is an important test  linuser | 09/14/09
ACID3 is internet standards ...  de-void | 09/14/09
W3C has its own test suites that are far better.  CobraA1 | 09/14/09
You should read your own links  BFD | 09/14/09
Acid3 results list  linuser | 09/14/09
How does it help intranet devs to build on non-final standards?  PB_z | 09/14/09
It's all part of the process  linuser | 09/14/09
Wow, how... progressive of you.  PollyProteus | 09/14/09
There's no justification for it  linuser | 09/14/09
No, it doesn't seem "odd"  LiquidLearner | 09/14/09
Two words: Backwards Compatibility  CobraA1 | 09/14/09
There is a solution for that  linuser | 09/14/09
You've just described IE8!! Well done!  de-void | 09/14/09
No he hasn't.  fr0thy2 | 09/14/09
yes, he has  rtk | 09/14/09
ditto on what de-void said.  CobraA1 | 09/14/09
re: backward compatibility  roelmann | 09/15/09
The problem with your argument  LiquidLearner | 09/14/09
Plans Do Not Include "7"  pogson | 09/14/09
Re: Plans Do Not Include "7"  apexwm | 09/14/09
linuxuser123  linuxuser123 | 09/14/09
Speaking of HD content and Linux,  NeoGeneration | 09/14/09
From experience.  rtk | 09/14/09
Funny....  todbran@... | 09/14/09
I dont beleive you  jdbukis@... | 09/14/09
Have you add up the costs?  snixon@... | 09/16/09
Seeing as thats not how MS licence.  jdbukis@... | 09/14/09
If it aint broke don't fix it.  snixon@... | 09/16/09
Love these posts...  LiquidLearner | 09/14/09
Everything you stated in your post..  TedKraan | 09/15/09
What a strong argument...  LiquidLearner | 09/15/09
Linux Support.  Looks Confused | 09/15/09
Unusual  jeremychappell | 09/14/09
What a lot of people don't understand  LiquidLearner | 09/14/09
Given Microsoft's History...  catcreekjim | 09/14/09
RE: Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now  dhicks4 | 09/14/09
Never clean up the code?  Lester Young | 09/15/09
RE: Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now  rgod8855 | 09/14/09
RE: Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now  dhicks4 | 09/14/09
progress way too slow here  d.gruntled | 09/14/09
Long overdue XP upgrade  Corey340 | 09/14/09
"remain competitive" To What?  dunn@... | 09/15/09
Probably the IT managers themselves.  Lester Young | 09/15/09
Who does an "OS" upgrade in isolation?  croberts | 09/14/09
If this is true  jeremychappell | 09/14/09
You forget  LiquidLearner | 09/14/09
No thanks.  BillDem | 09/14/09
Ummm, no...  LiquidLearner | 09/14/09
It's not the OS  snixon@... | 09/16/09
But is MicroSoft PROMISING no incompatibilities?  kd5auq | 09/14/09
I guess  NStalnecker | 09/14/09
Guaranteed assuming  Michael Kelly | 09/14/09
Either way  NStalnecker | 09/14/09
Why do you think XP Mode was created?  NeoGeneration | 09/14/09
It's a Pain-Pain proposition  SteveMak | 09/15/09
Windows 7 Working Great  gfinzer@... | 09/14/09
Don't reply to this guy..  TedKraan | 09/15/09
Great! Now does it work with 100 legacy apps  dunn@... | 09/15/09
No it does not  gfinzer@... | 09/16/09
Let me think about it.  DemonX | 09/14/09
Why not? (NT)  NStalnecker | 09/14/09
The reason is very simple.  DemonX | 09/16/09
I love windows 7  rupaa62 | 09/14/09
Yeah, right...  jasonp@... | 09/14/09
If a company spent millions on their software  LiquidLearner | 09/14/09
Some business needs can be so specific  TedKraan | 09/15/09
6 months after RTM?  jasonp@... | 09/15/09
Yes...  LiquidLearner | 09/15/09
How to upgrade from XP to Windows 7?  javarunner | 09/14/09
No budget for a while for most companies  TedKraan | 09/15/09
Wait until Win 7 SP1  CPPDEV | 09/15/09
Vista. WOW!  SteveMak | 09/15/09
You are jinxing it even before it's here..  TedKraan | 09/15/09
RE: Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now  bearlyworking | 09/15/09
History Will Repeat....  preacherx | 09/15/09
Maybe if price is right  ksarkies@... | 09/15/09
Deploying Win7 Here We Come  WindowsMan | 09/16/09
RE: Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now  madagoouk@... | 09/16/09
RE: Microsoft pushes business users to start Windows 7 upgrades now  rmhdsn | 09/17/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here