On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 10th, 2009

Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 7:30 am

Categories: Corporate strategy, Linux, Open source, Windows 7, Windows client

Tags: GPL, Microsoft Corp., Tool, Productivity, Microsoft Windows 7, Microsoft Windows, Open Source, Operating Systems, Software, Mary Jo Foley

Microsoft has pulled an update tool for Windows 7 from the Microsoft Store site after a report indicating that the tool incorporated open-source code in a way that violated the GNU General Public License.

Rafael Rivera of the “Within Windows” blog reported on November 6 that he had found something suspicious when mucking around int he code for the Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool. (That tool, which Microsoft made available on October 22, is designed to help netbook users upgrade from XP to Windows 7 in a more streamlined way.)

On November 9, Microsoft pulled the download tool from its site. A spokesperson sent me the following update:

“Microsoft is looking into this issue and is taking down the WUDT tool from the Microsoft Store site until its investigations are complete. We apologize to our customers for any inconvenience.”

Rivera noted that the Microsoft tool may violate more than a few GPL terms and conditions. From his post:

“A simple search of some method names and properties, gleaned from Reflector’s output, revealed the source code was obviously lifted from the CodePlex-hosted (yikes) GPLv2-licensed ImageMaster project. (The author of the code was not contacted by Microsoft.)…

“Microsoft did not offer or provide source code for their modifications to ImageMaster nor their tool…. Second, Microsoft glued in some of their own licensing terms, further restricting your rights to the software (TermsOfUse.rtf).”

Microsoft has run afoul of the GPL licensing terms on a few occasions. Most recently, there were questions raised by some in the open-source community about Microsoft’s motives for making some of its drivers available for inclusion in the Linux source tree. (Microsoft officials maintained that the company didn’t release the source code because of potential legal issues; some in the open-source community begged to differ.)

Stay tuned for more on this, as Microsoft proceeds with its investigation….

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 84 Talkback(s)
RE: Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?
this is not the 1st time microsoft has violated the gpl.thanks to god, this got caught otherwise few years later it would have patented it.Microsoft has never innovated anything. it has not invented d... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ankitsingh Posted on: 11/17/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Probably  Ceridan | 11/10/09
Deleted Duplicate Post  Looks Confused | 11/11/09
Dang  Looks Confused | 11/11/09
Do I have to reply to both? (nt) wink  Economister | 11/11/09
And no....  Economister | 11/11/09
if true they should get penalize (nt)  Quebec-french | 11/10/09
No they shouldn't  John Zern | 11/10/09
Wrong comparison  Economister | 11/11/09
Fair is as fair does...  jasonp@... | 11/11/09
I doubt that...  Ceridan | 11/11/09
Assume for a moment that......  Economister | 11/11/09
It was a CodePlex project?  BFD | 11/10/09
FSF should sue M$  Linux Geek | 11/10/09
triple damages?  hjagla | 11/10/09
Shush you...  Ceridan | 11/10/09
Maths?  The Evangelist | 11/10/09
Who cares?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/09
"No" is rather a glib generalilzation...  HypnoToad72 | 11/10/09
so if its ok for ms to violate gpl  Quebec-french | 11/10/09
Wow bit...  Tim Patterson | 11/10/09
Make that veracity  Ole Man | 11/10/09
If that's the case  Michael Kelly | 11/10/09
While  NStalnecker | 11/10/09
We have it  Richard Flude | 11/10/09
No users care one way or the other.  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/10/09
Microsoft needs to read the GPL again  apexwebmaster | 11/10/09
Microsoft could have been/most likely is violating the GPL for years  Ole Man | 11/10/09
That Murphy article is astounding!  peter_erskine@... | 11/10/09
Congratulations on your ability, AND interest, in reading  Ole Man | 11/10/09
But then again  John Zern | 11/10/09
Again, but then again......  Ole Man | 11/11/09
As long as .....  Economister | 11/10/09
Don't worry, the big bad wolf won't get you  Ole Man | 11/10/09
Really. And whose IP does Google  John Zern | 11/10/09
Wrong, wrong, wrong........  Ole Man | 11/11/09
But of course no other company  GuidingLight | 11/12/09
Yes, there is no honor among thieves  Ole Man | 11/12/09
RE: Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?  Loverock Davidson | 11/10/09
So I guess it is OK  Economister | 11/10/09
possibly a better analogy...  Fark | 11/10/09
Is MS happy...  Economister | 11/10/09
Then you just gave us the answer we needed  John Zern | 11/10/09
I don't know  Economister | 11/10/09
why are you still breathing?  ljenux-23043766007667558234416105604265 | 11/10/09
So I guess...  awasson@... | 11/11/09
So what?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/10/09
Not their code...  verrick | 11/10/09
Thanks again  Drakaran | 11/10/09
Bottom line  Michael Kelly | 11/10/09
No it isn't !!!!!!!!  Economister | 11/10/09
Actually  Michael Kelly | 11/10/09
Really. Warned with an extortion letter?  Economister | 11/10/09
Yes, it is.  TripleII | 11/10/09
You are correct and I am well aware of that.  Economister | 11/10/09
Mary Loves MS! End of story! She used to report on them!  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 11/10/09
And didn't you tell everyone here  John Zern | 11/10/09
And what if is what a misinterpertation of the GPL?  John Zern | 11/10/09
The GPL is very clear  Lerianis10 | 11/13/09
RE: Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?  mlbslugger | 11/10/09
Did a writer cull from others and violate ethics? Mary! (NT)  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 11/10/09
OMG! You are such a umm....undresser for sex?.... to MS!  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 11/10/09
Just for the record,  Rick_K | 11/10/09
That post is both highly offensive and ridiculous  rahbm | 11/17/09
I bet it did.  bendib | 11/10/09
They aren't notorious for being 'evil bastards'  Lerianis10 | 11/13/09
whole windows desktop is GPL violation  ljenux-23043766007667558234416105604265 | 11/10/09
nope. not a violation  cypherpunks@... | 11/12/09
Microsoft is SCUM! (NT)  AdventTech67 | 11/11/09
RE: Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?  bkochis | 11/11/09
Not Forgetting other GPL foul-ups  Agnostic_OS | 11/11/09
The fact that experienced GPL specialists missed this issue ...  de-void | 11/11/09
It doesn't take an (GPL, or any other kind) "experienced specialist"  Ole Man | 11/12/09
RE: Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?  nanotm | 11/11/09
RE: Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?  Ammalgam | 11/11/09
Its up to the copyright holder.  Looks Confused | 11/11/09
You are absolutely correct, but.....  Economister | 11/11/09
Why does MS sue people for piracy if piracy is good? (NT)  Just True | 11/11/09
What would be interesting to know is...  zkiwi | 11/11/09
Since the GPL is designed more to prevent theft of code  Ole Man | 11/12/09
Someone should have to pay  lehnerus2000 | 11/12/09
True, usually when something like this appears  Lerianis10 | 11/13/09
Easy solution to all these 'licensing problems'  Lerianis10 | 11/13/09
Absolutely!  Ole Man | 11/13/09
RE: Did Microsoft Windows 7 download tool violate the GPL?  ankitsingh | 11/17/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here