On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

June 14th, 2007

Linspire joins the Microsoft 'IP protection' racket

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 7:14 am

Categories: Corporate strategy, Legal, Linux, Novell, Office, Office 2007, Search

Tags: Linux, Linspire, Microsoft Corp., Mary Jo Foley

Another week, another Linux vendor signs Microsoft’s ‘IP protection’ clause, supposedly saving its customers from potential Microsoft patent-infringement lawsuits.

On June 14, Linspire — the company Microsoft sued for use of the “Lindows” trademark a few years back — signed a patent agreement with Microsoft. Linspire is the third Linux distro vendor (the other two being Novell and Xandros) to sign such a contract.

Beyond giving Microsoft more fuel for its claim that Linux and open-source software violates 235 of Microsoft’s patents (which these Linux customers need patent-infringement protection against in order to maintain peace of mind), Linspire also furthers a number of other Microsoft goals with this deal:

* Linspire is joining with Novell and Microsoft to create more translators allowing Open Office to share documents with Office 2007. Because Microsoft has been dinged — especially by government customers in the U.S. and abroad — for its resistance to supporting Open Office ODF format, it has been working overtime to show how dedicated it is to Open XML-ODF interoperability.

* Linspire is making Live Search the default Web search engine in Linspire 5.0. Every little search deal helps, when you’re trying to pull yourself out from a distant third place in search share.

* Linspire has licensed Microsoft TrueType fonts, “including Arial, Georgia®, Times New Roman and Verdana.” However, as the fine press-release print notes, “Linspire customers only receive these three technologies (instant messaging, digital media and TrueType fonts) if they purchase a patent SKU. The technologies are not shipped with all Linspire 5.0 distributions.”

My ZDNet blogging colleague Larry Dignan wonders whether Red Hat might be next to join Microsoft’s patent-protection racket. I think Red Hat will continue to hold out from helping Microsoft plant more fear, uncertainty and doubt in the minds of customers who dare to use Linux alongside Windows. Do you think Red Hat will succumb?

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 37 Talkback(s)
From Wikipedia ( My added comments BOLD )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_money

A protection racket is an extortion scheme whereby a pow... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Old Timer 8080 Posted on: 06/22/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Linspire, Carmony, and ESR...  Tim Patterson | 06/14/07
Stirring up Trouble with Titles?  nucrash | 06/14/07
Message has been deleted.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
Whoops  nucrash | 06/14/07
re: clicks  Arm A. Geddon | 06/14/07
Naw, the  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
She is just calling it what it is, a RACKET. Pretty obvious to anybody with  DonnieBoy | 06/14/07
What motivates these companies?  otaddy | 06/14/07
MS not so dumb  andycher | 06/14/07
You are thinking too small  nucrash | 06/14/07
Uh, common sense would be my guess.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
Yes but alliances with Microsoft work so well  nucrash | 06/14/07
re: alliances  Arm A. Geddon | 06/14/07
IBM is very happy with their partnership with MS.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
Yea right, we can trust Microsoft for our interoperability needs. You are  DonnieBoy | 06/14/07
Where the proof?  Randalllind | 06/14/07
So whats stopping you?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
Mary Jo, most biased "reporter" on the planet.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
Quite the contrary  Tim Patterson | 06/14/07
couldn't agree more!! nt  Arm A. Geddon | 06/14/07
Then show me your proof.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
The proof? It's in the "pudding"!  Mercutio_Viz | 06/14/07
We want proof that it is NOT a racket. The best proof, would be to list all  DonnieBoy | 06/14/07
This is a Blog  owl06 | 06/14/07
Yes, thats as good an excuse as any I suppose.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
It is rather obvious that this is a RACKET.  DonnieBoy | 06/14/07
But, she is right on the money here, when did MS EVER reveal the patents???  DonnieBoy | 06/14/07
Congrats, MJ  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/14/07
In defense of Linspire  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/14/07
Very True  nucrash | 06/14/07
re: defense  Arm A. Geddon | 06/14/07
LOL, seems everyone thinks there is a silent "positive"  TripleII | 06/14/07
I would love to see the dollar figures of these deals. Something tells me,  DonnieBoy | 06/14/07
No, Linspire paid MS, as will Red Hat, ect  John Zern | 06/14/07
What Tim said — Mary Jo's right  zaine_ridling | 06/15/07
Headline should be  Ole Man | 06/16/07
From Wikipedia ( My added comments BOLD )  Old Timer 8080 | 06/22/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here