On MovieTome: First Look: Jessica Alba in 'Machete'!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 13th, 2007

Can Microsoft get its $12 million back from SCO?

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 10:39 am

Categories: Corporate strategy, Legal, Linux, Novell

Tags: SCO Group Inc., Microsoft Corp., Mary Jo Foley

A judge has ruled that SCO doesn’t own the Unix copyright. — SCO’s claim to which was at the crux of its threats against Linux. What does this ruling mean to Microsoft, if anything?

As my blogging colleague Dana Blankenhorn notes, the SCO ruling seemingly has no impact on Microsoft’s allegations of patent violations by the Linux and open-source communities.

But industry historians may recall that Microsoft wasn’t totally removed from the whole SCO-Unix-copyright matter.

Microsoft played matchmaker back in 2003 when SCO needed money to help fund its lawsuits agains IBM and various other Linux players and customers. Microsoft suggested that hedge fund BayStar Capital invest $50 million in SCO.

Microsoft also backed SCO’s play to convince other vendors and customers to license SCO’s technology to avoid potential infringement lawsuits. (Maybe that’s where Microsoft got its patent-licensing ideas ….)

One of the first companies to snap up two SCO licenses was Microsoft, to the tune of $12 million, according to BusinessWeek. Sun Microsystems and Computer Associates also bought into SCO’s plan.

I wonder if Microsoft will attempt to recoup its $12 million, now that SCO’s Unix licensing strategy has been exposed as a sham? I asked the Softies for any statements they might want to make, re: the SCO matter. So far, no word back.

Update: Late on August 13, a Microsoft spokesman sent the following reply: “Unfortunately, we won’t be commenting on the ruling.”

Update No. 2: As Seattle Post-Intelligencer blogger Todd Bishop pointed out, there is some wording in the judge’s ruling regarding who should get the royalty payments made by Microsoft (and Sun) to SCO. Bishop says the actual amount Microsoft paid to SCO is $16.75 million. The ruling makes it sound as if anyone is going to get paid back by SCO, it’s going to be Novell, not Microsoft.

Mary Jo FoleyMary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. You can also follow Mary Jo on Twitter.

Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here or to see Mary Jo's full profile click here.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 45 Talkback(s)
Not enough money at SCO.
MS lost their tithing. Novell will get any and all assets remaining at SCO. (Read the rest)
Posted by: nomorems Posted on: 09/16/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
It's only $12 million  Michael Kelly | 08/13/07
12 Million?  GuidingLight | 08/13/07
Which is only $3 million more than they have ...  Still Lynn | 08/15/07
Why?  dragosani | 08/13/07
I'd say to stop from forming a habbit  voska | 08/13/07
Why would they worry over chump change?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/13/07
Novell should ask for triple damages  Linux Geek | 08/13/07
Conversion  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/13/07
Love it!  maldain | 08/13/07
What problems?  Linux User 147560 | 08/13/07
And you wonder why no one believes you  voska | 08/13/07
To Microsoft, $12 million is chump change...  Confused by religion | 08/13/07
Do a little math,  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/14/07
If you think $12 Million is chump change for anyone...  jasonp@... | 08/14/07
Re: Why would they worry over chump change?  none none | 08/13/07
Egad. I Find Myself in Agreement with No_Ax.  dumptux | 08/13/07
Yeah, then he blew it...  jasonp@... | 08/14/07
Chump change indeed!!  Still Lynn | 08/15/07
MS is having a really bad day  TripleII | 08/13/07
I will take Microsoft's "bad hair month"  Confused by religion | 08/13/07
Short term gain for long term pain  TripleII | 08/13/07
SCO administers the licenses  John L. Ries | 08/13/07
Thats right!  DemonX | 08/13/07
Cigar, but no close...  Still Lynn | 08/15/07
Take a number  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/13/07
12 million may seem like a drop in the bucket  Shelendrea | 08/13/07
Not enough money at SCO.  nomorems | 09/16/07
Either MS was stupid or they facilitated the defrauding of investors ...  George Mitchell | 08/13/07
MS is going to let this dog sleep.  osreinstall | 08/13/07
I wouldn't be suprised  Monkey_MCSE | 08/13/07
Maybe but MS will not initialize it.  osreinstall | 08/14/07
McBride Book?  John L. Ries | 08/14/07
Sure.  osreinstall | 08/14/07
Microsoft Chump Change  Ole Man | 08/13/07
Shut up, OleFool.  M.R. Kennedy | 09/15/07
Stay in your hole and Rot, MS Brother (NT)  nomorems | 09/16/07
Microsoft Got Their Money's Worth  dumptux | 08/13/07
The license is valid  dscherf | 08/14/07
Why is MS doing Linux and Unix?  Randalllind | 08/14/07
Why is MS doing Linux and Unix?  Still Lynn | 08/15/07
Customers Demand Linux support from Microsoft  mighetto | 09/14/07
I thought the "license" had a "no refund" clause?  kd5auq | 08/14/07
At first, yes.  Still Lynn | 08/15/07
Microsoft's REAL agenda  mannyamador | 08/15/07
ZDNet sucks!  nomorems | 09/16/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads