On TechRepublic: Male bashing in the workplace
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 11th, 2007

Open source is bad for vendors

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:41 am

Categories: Development, General, Legal, Strategy, business models, management

Tags: Open Source, Vendor, Howard Anderson, Dana Blankenhorn

Howard Anderson has a moan out today, complaining that open source is very, very bad for vendors.

He's right. Vendors have trod the computing world like Kings for decades. Open source changes the market's dynamics. (Photo from Mel Brooks' History of the World Part I.)

Open source reduces a vendor's power in customer relationships. Open source also reduces a vendor's hold on key employees, who can now walk out the door and continue working on what the vendor was selling.

That's the idea of open source.

There are two sides in every market relationship, and the boss's side is just one of them. Customers want to reduce the control vendors have over them, which in the computer business is enormous. Employees want to enhance their bargaining power, not just to make more money but to do work they like.

Many of these vendor fears are wrapped up in the phrase "intellectual property." What you do for me becomes my property.

But why should it? Why should you, as an employer, continue to profit from the work I perform as your employee? Why should you, as a vendor, continue to control the machine I bought from you?

The attitude that economic relationships should be that way comes to us from the late 19th century, the mass production age which made it necessary to forge teams in order to build new things. The corporation stood in, as an individual, for the team and assumed rights to what the team had built.

It's good to be the King.

But markets don't have to be that way. Patents and copyrights were conceived as individual rights, not corporate goods. And open source proves that inventions can be even grander than before if rights to the work are held in common.

To some people this still sounds like revolution, like a peasant's revolt. It's not. It's just a new market reality, one which has no use for Kings. Which is the way the commoner Adam Smith (above) intended it.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 31 Talkback(s)
So all Ned Ludd had to do...
...was to have his wife and daughters teach the neighbor women how to weave (free of charge) so they could make their own clothes without having to patronize the new textile mills.

Makes my wife's hobby of knitting more subversive than I had imagined.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: John L. Ries Posted on: 05/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Any limitations?  rapson | 05/11/07
Hiring.  Anton Philidor | 05/11/07
Anton, I love you  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 05/11/07
Not a revolution in economic relationships.  Anton Philidor | 05/11/07
Confiscation?  John L. Ries | 05/11/07
Confiscation involves taking without compensation.  Anton Philidor | 05/11/07
Not too overblown rhetoric? Definitely too overblown.  mosborne | 05/11/07
The moon belongs to everyone.  Anton Philidor | 05/11/07
Let me provide an example  John L. Ries | 05/11/07
An employer which would settle...  Anton Philidor | 05/12/07
I repeat, this was hypothetical  John L. Ries | 05/12/07
Luddites? Interesting  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 05/12/07
Ned Ludd would be satisfied.  Anton Philidor | 05/12/07
If you're right...  John L. Ries | 05/12/07
Dumping.  Anton Philidor | 05/13/07
So all Ned Ludd had to do...  John L. Ries | 05/14/07
But how is that bad for vendors?  B.O.F.H. | 05/11/07
You're the vendor.  Anton Philidor | 05/11/07
Which product/company/service do you mean?  B.O.F.H. | 05/11/07
And yet somehow this has been violated by current  Linux User 147560 | 05/11/07
Comments  rapson | 05/11/07
I'm willing to bet...  BFD | 05/11/07
How much you willing to bet?  Linux User 147560 | 05/11/07
no wonder you are clueless  code_Warrior | 05/14/07
Common Sense  jabailo1 | 05/11/07
The "Problem" with Open Source  Conmergence | 05/11/07
Not a coincidence  John L. Ries | 05/11/07
Open Source is the best thing to happen to the industry and consumers  Duke E. Love | 05/11/07
Open source would be great for government  leeuant | 05/11/07
Money! Money!  gotitright | 05/11/07
Open Source takes your innovation and makes money off it but doesnt pay you  zzz1234567890 | 05/14/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More