On mySimon: Skip Fabric Softener with Dryer Balls
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

June 18th, 2007

Harvard study illustrates Microsoft's political problem

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:27 am

Categories: Development, FOSS, GPL, General, Legal, Microsoft

Tags: Developer, Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

Alan McCormack Harvard Business SchoolA recent Harvard Business School survey of open source developers accidentally demonstrates Microsoft’s big political problem.

Alan McCormack (right) and colleagues sought interviews with 332 open source developers, and 34 eventually succumbed. They agreed that the best open source license is the one which gives them the greatest flexibility.

Not a big deal, not a surprise. But then it turns out the study was funded by Microsoft.

Free Software Foundation executive director Peter Brown immediately smelled a rat:

“This paper Microsoft is pushing says a large portion of the developers want free software to be not so free. Well, that’s tough. If people don’t want software to be free, then maybe they should use a different license, but we believe in free software.”

It’s the tone of the quote, rather than its content, which I want to focus on. Brown is angry, suspicious, even defensive.

Worse, he has a right to be. When Mr. McCormack contacted his list, it would only be ethical to disclose Microsoft’s funding, and I’m certain he is ethical. My guess is this impacted who responded.

The wording used in the conclusions, “The majority of developers do not support any organization imposing its views upon other developers or abridging other developers’ rights,” can also be read as a slap against Microsoft, against Apache, against any group imposing itself on the choices developers make.

Does the GPL do this? No. It’s a choice developers make, alongside dozens of other license choices. And any developer can write their own, proprietary license.

The point is that controversy and suspicion follow Microsoft wherever it goes in the open source world. This is a price it has chosen to pay. Perhaps it is unaware of how high this price is. Perhaps the company does not care.

But every day the price rises.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 14 Talkback(s)
Crowds have been ignorant
For thousands of years, and exhibit no
signs of becoming less ignorant with the
passage of time.

Nothing new under the sun. Any thought
you think has already been thunk.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Ole Man Posted on: 06/20/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
WOW, 34 respondents???? Amazing!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/18/07
Read the Article. MICROSOFT got a whole 34 respondents for THEIR survey!!!  DonnieBoy | 06/18/07
Ziiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnng!  Ole Man | 06/19/07
Hm...  John L. Ries | 06/18/07
NOT users  richvball44 | 06/18/07
Yes, the tone of the response is significant.  Anton Philidor | 06/18/07
Yes, it does  rapson | 06/18/07
Yes, an accepted imposition...  Anton Philidor | 06/18/07
Not true at all.  none none | 06/18/07
You've done gone  Ole Man | 06/19/07
Of possible Interest - The Ignorance of Crowds  Conmergence | 06/18/07
Crowds have been ignorant  Ole Man | 06/20/07
The Paris Hilton syndrome  samirchopra | 06/19/07
MS vs Open Source is a Big Red Herring...  dhettinger | 06/20/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here