On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 16th, 2007

The iPhone bill demonstrates need for open spectrum

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 1:55 pm

Categories: Apple, Applications, General, Government, Infrastructure, Internet, VOIP, business models, mass market, mobile, politics, telecom, wireless

Tags: Apple iPhone, Event, Spectrum, Dana Blankenhorn

In Focus » See more posts on: Net Neutrality

The 300 page iPhone billIt’s bigger than the Star Wars kid. Bigger than the prairie dog looking funny at the camera. We’re talking Macaca big.

It’s the 300 page iPhone bill, in a box that cost $10 to ship, and nothing could better illustrate the need for open spectrum as we head into an election year.

George Allen points to MacacaThe bill listed every text message, and every file the woman downloaded. That’s how the phone companies roll. Everything you do is an event. Make a call and it’s an event, send a message and it’s a event, look at a web page and it’s an event, watch a TV show and it’s an event.

Every event is chargeable, separately.

The Internet runs differently. You are charged a monthly fee for your Internet access, depending on the maximum speed. You are promised a “best effort” to reach that speed, but the monthly charge remains the same whether you use it an hour or all day.

When the cell companies rush to the FCC and demand their rules for the coming auction of TV spectrum, this is the model they are trying to protect. The event model.

This is why the phone companies want to get into cable, and why they are trying to kill VOIP. This is why they are actively fighting net neutrality and censoring the Internet.

It is in their best interest to do all this, to claim that without controls over what’s done and what equipment runs on wireless spectrum they won’t bid high for newly licensed frequencies.

But that just makes the government complicit. If the government cares only for the money it gets from selling spectrum licenses, and is willing to let you endure monopolistic practices like the iPhone bill, whose fault is that?

It’s yours. Because the government belongs to you. The spectrum should belong to all of us.

With the 300 page iPhone bill, we finally have a clear symbol of what we’re talking about.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 10 Talkback(s)
EQUALS Private Oportunity
The concept of "owning" the public communications spectrum is rediculous. Our current system of spectrum sales and subsequent spectrum-enabled monopolist practices are the antithesis of the "free" ec... (Read the rest)
Posted by: John Westra Posted on: 08/25/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
User has video on YouTube  007baf | 08/16/07
Huh? Open Spectrum has what to do with it?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/07
The use of frequency  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 08/17/07
You didn't amswer the question at all.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/07
The content (to an iPhone) is going over GSM.  B.O.F.H. | 08/18/07
Monopoly? Duopoly?  GuidingLight | 08/18/07
I think the term you are looking for is "oligopoly" (nt)  CobraA1 | 08/19/07
It's still billing practices  rpmyers1 | 08/17/07
socialism does not work people have to make money  SO.CAL Guy | 08/19/07
EQUALS Private Oportunity  John Westra | 08/25/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads