On mySimon: Tippmann X7 Paintball Gun
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

October 3rd, 2007

Open source tells content owners adapt or die

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 8:14 am

Categories: General, Internet, Legal, Strategy, business models, content, management, mass market, publishing

Tags: New York Times Co., Radiohead, Open Source Movement, Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

New York Times SelectOpen source offers a business model for software which gives consumers more control. They get the code, they can see the code, they can change the code, without ever paying you a dime.

That they do pay you, that they pay you enough for you to make a business function, is the great business miracle of our time, resulting from the Internet dropping marketing and distribution costs to near  zero.

This column is also an open source business model of a sorts. You’re not paying me to read it. You can talk back to me, and you can even get changes made if I misspell something, get something wrong, or there’s an update. The ads pay the bills.

This, too, is a function of the Internet’s low, low low distribution costs. The success of this model can be seen in The New York Times‘ decision to drop their paid TimesSelect service. The company said it was making $10 million/year from subscriptions but felt it could make more giving away access, from advertising.

Now we’re seeing musicians embrace the open source concept. In effect, groups like Radiohead are “busking” on the Internet, hoping that their fans’ contributions will bring them more money than they could get from a record company.

Again the model is the same. And the assumption is it will work best for established brands, which don’t have to pay to market themselves, which can get enough free distribution so ads and donations will make the numbers work.

Can this work for new writers, for new musicians, for new journalists? In many cases it already has. In others, as in this case, intermediaries still do a better job of aggregating and monetizing the necessary eyeballs.

That’s how all content middlemen will have to earn their keep in the future. The open source movement has hit content big-time, and things will never be the same. You adapt or you die.

I’ve adapted. ZDNet has adapted. The New York Times has adapted. Radiohead has adapted. Not everyone has.

Do those who don’t deserve to live, in a business sense?

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 10 Talkback(s)
DRM
DRM remains the issue divide between open source and FOSS.

FOSS advocates hate DRM. Open source advocates accept it, albeit grudgingly.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: DanaBlankenhorn Posted on: 10/06/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Answer your question  glocks out | 10/03/07
well as far as news goes  Quebec-french | 10/03/07
Know the reason why?  MisterMiester | 10/03/07
Internet is treated as a loss of revenue.  Anton Philidor | 10/03/07
Everything is relative.... everything is relevant  Ole Man | 10/03/07
Please reread the post.  Anton Philidor | 10/03/07
I understand the context of your topic  Ole Man | 10/03/07
How many open source supporters...  Anton Philidor | 10/04/07
DRM  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 10/06/07
Every disruptive business model is associated with theft...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 10/04/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads