On CHOW: Are five meats enough for pizza?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 7th, 2007

Can Red Hat ever make open source advocates happy?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 9:21 am

Categories: General, Red Hat, Strategy, Sun Microsystems, java, management, support

Tags: Red Hat Inc., Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

Greg DeKoenigsberg of Red HatRed Hat has joined Sun’s OpenJDK project, aligning its IcedTea project with it. (Should that now be IcedCoffee?)

The reaction of open source bloggers to this news? Finally, wrote our own Stephen Shankland. What was the hold-up, asked EnterpriseLinux. What took you, asked Business Review Online.

I’ve previously compared Red Hat here to Rodney Dangerfield , and earlier today I hinted at the reason.

Red Hat is run like a corporation, not a community. It’s run by executives, not by programmers.

Right now, the company is launching a re-org, under former EMC executive Nick Van Wyk, which is also focused on corporate goals. To those who base their view of open source on sharing, this sounds galling.

But is it? Red Hat has not made a move against CentOS, a binary of Red Hat Enterprise Linux which does not even credit Red Hat on its Web site.

Greg DeKoenigsberg (above), the Red Hat Community Development Manager who also blogs as Gregdek, insisted recently there is no ill will. The lack of credit is just Red Hat protecting its trademark, he wrote. “Why is there no CentOS equivalent based on SuSE products?” he added. “Think about it.”

As to why Red Hat was so late with the IcedTea, Dave Shields suggested, the answer might be SunTea. Despite making OpenJDK open source, Sun still insists on complete control, he writes. Red Hat has finally ceded the point.

In other words, Red Hat is still in better odor with much of the the open source community than Sun, and perhaps that is why Sun’s results are so disappointing. Going down the open source incline means more than accepting the GPL. It also means accepting the standards and methods of the open source world.

Which Red Hat seems to do, even though the view of these issues, from Silicon Valley across to Raleigh, North Carolina, does tend to look a bit like Saul Steinberg’s famous New Yorker cover, only with Santa Clara in the foreground and everything else distant.

Besides, Steve Ballmer still hates Red Hat.  Sometimes the enemy of your enemy is indeed your friend.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 11 Talkback(s)
As long as...
...Red Hat continues to charge for their products I don't care what they do they aren't considered a choice for me. I prefer distros and products made by the distro maintainer that are free and true t... (Read the rest)
Posted by: John Musbach Posted on: 11/28/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Interesting problems (opportunities)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/07/07
Linux continues to grow...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 11/07/07
Sorry I missed it  Richard Flude | 11/07/07
CentOS ... and giving credit on the CentOS Website  jhughes@... | 11/08/07
Thanks for writing...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 11/09/07
Run like a corporation  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/07/07
Whether the staff would leave...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 11/09/07
RE: Can Red Hat ever make open source advocates happy?  uno@... | 11/09/07
Centos crediting Red Hat  Surloc | 11/09/07
RE: Can Red Hat ever make open source advocates happy?  Absolutely | 11/27/07
As long as...  John Musbach | 11/28/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here