On mySimon: Ultimate Box Sets!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 14th, 2008

Should IBM results count as open source win?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:50 am

Categories: Hardware, IBM, Strategy, business models, mergers & acquisitions, support

Tags: IBM Corp., Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

IBM chair Sam PalmisanoIBM earnings jumped a surprising 24% based on strong sales in Asia and Europe.

Should this count as an open source win, a validation of the open source concept?

I think it should. But there’s more to it than that.

IBM long-ago unified its product lines under Linux and open source. Through projects like Eclipse it has learned how to share basic costs and add value for its customers.

IBM’s business is now high-end manufacturing, customization, and system integration. Computing, in all its forms, is just a means to its end, which is to maintain the trust of the fortunate 500 worldwide.

There’s nothing fancy here. CEO Sam Palmisano doesn’t have to worry about fitting into tight jeans for a keynote on a catwalk. Nothing about IBM is too sexy for your shirt.  

Yet the company continues to march forward. Despite some rather silly ad campaigns, IBM maintains its momentum.

Despite maintaining its East Coast roots and virtual radio silence regarding the media,  IBM’s customers know who it is, and customers apparently know when to call it.

IBM’s stock performance matches up well against Microsoft’s over the last five years and its acquisitions, while not household names, all seem to have strategy behind them.

Take cloud computing, which Google is now promoting so heavily. IBM in the last year bought Arsenal Digital and XIV, both leaders in online storage.

It has also been active on the software front, buying Solid Information and Cognos.

IBM has also integrated those acquisitions. I’ve interviewed many people whose companies were acquired by IBM, and long-time IBM employees. Few seem to be complaining about pulling on the blue shirt in the morning.

IBM’s success is not all down to open source. Far from it. Open source is an IBM acquisition in the same way Solid or Arsenal or ISS is.

The key is that IBM understands its goal, scaling solutions for the biggest companies, bringing smaller prospects along, and it keeps itself focused on those customers.

I think Mr. Watson would be proud.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 3 Talkback(s)
RE: Should IBM results count as open source win?
"IBM has also integrated those acquisitions."

I think not...

http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/birt/mission-impossible/... (Read the rest)
Posted by: botchagalupe Posted on: 01/15/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Yikes  botchagalupe | 01/14/08
IBM hasn't got a clue  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/08
RE: Should IBM results count as open source win?  botchagalupe | 01/15/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline