On UrbanBaby: I won't vaccinate my daughter!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 16th, 2008

FCC starts Comcast cover-up on net neutrality

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 6:41 am

Categories: Freedom2Connect, General, Government, Internet, Legal, business models, content, mass market, politics, video

Tags: FCC, BitTorrent, Network, Comcast Corp., Net Neutrality, Cable, News, Bush FCC, Federal Government, Internet

FCC chair Kevin MartinThe Bush FCC has launched an “inquiry” which will likely kill net neutrality complaints by deeming throttling of BitTorrent traffic “reasonable.”

Having watched the FCC of Kevin Martin, and other Bush Administration agencies, transform Internet access from a highly competitive marketplace into a cable-Bell duopoly, I’m more than skeptical that anything will come out of the new proceeding.

You may disagree. I hope you’re right.

The FCC is responding to petitions from net neutrality proponents, seeking Comcast’s arguments before answering them. It has not launched any of its own investigations about violations of net neutrality.

As Broadband Reports notes, Comcast has been throttling BitTorrent, an open source file sharing protocol, for months. Its argument is that this is “network management,” when it is in fact the protection of its control over video delivery.

The business model of cable operators like Comcast is to charge both sides of every video transaction.

Cable networks are charged for reaching the consumer, sometimes in the form of ad minutes. Consumers are charged for having the programs available, whether or not they watch them.

Protocols like BitTorrent threaten this model by allowing Internet users to quickly-and-easily move the programs they want over the Internet. You can see just how threatening this is through open source programs like Miro.

Those sending the files save money by having the traffic load dispersed, which is why many other open source projects, like OpenOffice, use BitTorrent to deliver software.

The FCC is “going after” Comcast only because the Bells, which also oppose net neutrality, are its most favored ISPs. Comcast is cast as the bad guy, but its lawyers will argue they’re just “delaying traffic,” in the name of “protecting” their network.

This is a legal fiction. Peer-to-peer traffic does not threaten the integrity of the Internet. What it threatens is the integrity of Bell and cable business models, while delaying needed reform in content business models.

Once Comcast’s nonsense is approved by the FCC, the Bells will also be free to transform the Internet into something more akin to their mobile phone networks, where the network gets a cut of everything and controls what you can access.

The only good news is that this is 2008. Raise holy heck now, make this a political issue, and we might get some real action next year.

Meanwhile all I can do is be steamed.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 50 Talkback(s)
50%?
You'll never get 50% because only 2% of Comcast customers are "abusive". Comcast is acting in the interest of the majority of its customers. Most customers don't even know what this fight is about and wouldn't care if they did know.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: drobinow Posted on: 02/14/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
How about waiting for the decision ....  ShadeTree | 01/16/08
Liberal spin? DUH - Only liberals fight monopolies, those bad liberals! -NT  raycote | 01/16/08
Daring to criticise corrupt corporate behavior ...  George Mitchell | 01/16/08
Why wait?  BitTwiddler | 01/16/08
...said the Comcast employee. (nt)  el1jones | 01/29/08
Explain to me...  Vesicant | 01/16/08
P2P network hogging  HooNoze | 01/16/08
Their prerogative is to charge heavy users extra not censor protocols - NT  raycote | 01/16/08
Sorry, but no...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 01/16/08
In all fairness ...  George Mitchell | 01/16/08
Well, what about legit heavy users - like, oh, YouTube or Ti  drprod@... | 01/17/08
They already do & why cable is crying  devlin_X | 01/17/08
Don't think they will stop at p2p traffic.  bjbrock | 01/16/08
Shade Tree? NAWWW!  drprod@... | 01/17/08
It's not bandwidth throttling ...  MisterMiester | 01/16/08
Excellent Point ...  George Mitchell | 01/16/08
Excellent Point  drprod@... | 01/17/08
Excellent point.... thus it's illegal? (nt)  el1jones | 01/29/08
Bittorrent actually DOSs the network.  osreinstall | 01/16/08
Greedy for content?  George Mitchell | 01/16/08
Now you are getting it.  osreinstall | 01/16/08
What they should have done,  devlin_X | 01/17/08
It is there but not advertised.  osreinstall | 01/17/08
RE: FCC starts Comcast cover-up on net neutrality  carlino | 01/16/08
This is just wrong.  Joe_Racer | 01/16/08
No place to go ...  terry flores | 01/16/08
Sounds like an oppertunity to me  Joe_Racer | 01/16/08
Just tell customers the truth...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/16/08
Right on the mark ...  George Mitchell | 01/16/08
Shocked and amazed.....I'm agreeing w/ No_Axe!  devlin_X | 01/17/08
I.... must.... agree... (kills me)  el1jones | 01/29/08
Death stroke for Movies over IP (MOIP)  terry flores | 01/16/08
Time-Warner announces usage-based broadband pricing  terry flores | 01/17/08
Not a fan of MOIP  r1r1p1@... | 01/17/08
Grab yer drawers, folks...  BitTwiddler | 01/16/08
RE: Anti-consumer administration  devlin_X | 01/17/08
Hooray! Devlin_X  r1r1p1@... | 01/17/08
We WOULD - IF Comcast, T-W and Verizon didn't RUN Everything  drprod@... | 01/17/08
Maybe I should restate!  r1r1p1@... | 01/17/08
50%?  drobinow | 02/14/08
They don't...  devlin_X | 01/17/08
GOTCHA CAPITALISM is what it is...  ordaj@... | 01/17/08
So do most politicians....Rep,/Dem./Ind (NT)  devlin_X | 01/17/08
RE: FCC starts Comcast cover-up on net neutrality  jamesrenz@... | 01/16/08
Yes, the BUSH FCC!  drprod@... | 01/17/08
On its face this has nothing to do with the crime of "net neutrality"  Omch'Ar | 01/16/08
You missed something - Comcast is a monopoly  terry flores | 01/17/08
Well, acknowledging municipal monopolies DOES put a spanner in their  drprod@... | 01/17/08
I don't understand your point  John Musbach | 01/17/08
You skipped over the selective filtering part ...  terry flores | 01/17/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads