On CHOW: The most delicious sandwiches
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 28th, 2008

How big a threat is good Microsoft?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 5:50 am

Categories: Development, Enterprise Policy, General, Microsoft, Strategy, business models, management, support

Tags: Dana Blankenhorn

Bill Gates as angel, by Matt ElderOne point was made to me repeatedly while covering the HIMSS show for ZDNet Healthcare this week. (Drawing by Matt Elder.)

All this “good Microsoft” stuff about supporting open source, abut placing code on Codeplex, and about keeping open source projects “in the loop” regarding format changes, is no head fake.

It’s serious. This is the new strategy. Kill open source with kindness.

Over time, if this strategy holds, all the hoopla over OOXML and SharePoint should die down. Microsoft will become as “open” as it was said to be in the 1980s. Shouts of kumbaya will be heard across the land.

Stop laughing.

Rather than trying to trap people with its proprietary code, Microsoft plans to give people what they know they want from open source, support it better than an open source project can, and get its enterprise market share back.

That’s the theory.

Now let’s assume we’re being told the truth. (I know, big assumption.) But wouldn’t Microsoft’s support, its development strength, and its enterprise hand-holding make it a threat to every open source project on the planet, if this were its strategy?

Isn’t this the best strategy Microsoft, in fact, has?

And how successful do you think it might be?

How big a threat would an open Microsoft be?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 25 Talkback(s)
Good
Does NOT belong in the same sentence with Microsoft, and the fact that it does indicates that the author is dependant on Microsoft for income or doesn't know which end is up, one or t'other.

(Read the rest)
Posted by: Ole Man Posted on: 03/09/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Business fundamentals  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/28/08
Great post!  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 02/28/08
Overstatement  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/28/08
Lot's MS can do.  TripleII | 02/28/08
Correction  TripleII | 02/28/08
RE: How big a threat is good Microsoft?  Penguiniator | 02/28/08
It does depend on what you mean...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 02/28/08
How much does "closed" cost?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/28/08
I have been say for some time they should go cross platform with .Net  TheTruthisOutThere@... | 02/28/08
Check out:  cornpie | 02/28/08
"Good" MS  John L. Ries | 02/28/08
"Good" MicroShaft? Surely You Jest!  drprodny | 02/29/08
Repentence is almost always possible...  John L. Ries | 03/01/08
What is the OBSESSION?  bkelly@... | 02/28/08
Don't have to read it  John L. Ries | 02/28/08
It gives some of them momentum  Boot_Agnostic | 02/29/08
With their stockpile of money and entrenched systems  Boot_Agnostic | 02/29/08
I think if they make a wrong move next  fr0thy | 03/01/08
We'll see how nice they are since OOXML apparently failed.  TripleII | 02/29/08
Well...  John L. Ries | 02/29/08
The Only Good Microsoft Is A Dead Microsoft  dumptux | 02/29/08
Penelope and Rupert don't want that ...  fr0thy | 03/01/08
Microsoft is not a suitable business partner.  peter_erskine@... | 03/01/08
"who would use them anyway?"  fr0thy | 03/01/08
Good  Ole Man | 03/09/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here