On mySimon: Backyard Safari Underground Time Capsule
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 31st, 2008

Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybe

Posted by Paula Rooney @ 1:33 am

Categories: Distributions, FOSS, GPL, Legal, Linux, Linux Desktop OS, Microsoft, Standards

Tags: Microsoft Office, ISO, Microsoft Corp., OpenDocument Format, OOXML, Iso standards, Process Improvement, OpenDocument Format (ODF), Quality, Business Operations

Looks like Microsoft’s Office Open XML will be an ISO standard after all. Maybe.

Pundits – even OOXML rivals –predicted on Sunday that the Redmond, Wash. software giant has amassed the required number of votes to pull it over the goal line. Of course, a final vote will not be tallied until Monday … so hold on.

According to Consortium.org, Microsoft got a boost from Norway, Ireland, Czech Republic, Denmark and South Korea, which changed their respective ‘No’ votes to ‘Yes’ votes for Office Open XML, while Finland, which abstained from the last vote, gave OOXML the thumbs up.

Andy Updegrove of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, a technology law firm based in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, has compiled the vote count and deemed that OOXML will get ISO approval.

In ODF’s favor, Venezuela changed its vote from “Yes” to “No” while Kenya, which formerly approved of OOXML becoming an ISO standard, opted to abstain.

ODF was approved as an ISO standard on May 1, 2006.

Microsoft began its battle to get ISO approval in early December of 2006. On December 7 of that year, ECMA International approved Office Open XML Formats as an Ecma standard and voted to submit the new standard to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) for consideration as an ISO standard.

Although many argued that there ought to be just one document format standard, Microsoft has lobbied the national standards bodies in at least 87 countries for two long years to accept OOXML as an ISO standard. Microsoft maintains that Office dominates on the desktop worldwide and that OOXML is a de facto standard anyway. Microsoft also made some requested changes as of late to the spec that got a few no votes into yes votes.

Whatever the case, big bucks are at stake. An ISO approval would make Microsoft’s Office an acceptable choice among many governments around the world. It will also make it harder for open source desktops, such as ODF, to gain market share.

It’s 4 a.m. EST Monday and still no word from ISO or from Microsoft’s European PR team. I found one Microsoft Office blogger rejoicing — but he’d only read the same reports that are linked here. It should be an interesting day. According to some reports that came in over the weekend, voting irregularities have occurred in Croatia and Germany and ODF backers are calling for a re-vote.

What a drama. The early polling looks good for Microsoft, but don’t hold me to it. Remember the major media outlets prematurely calling Al Gore’s win over GW in 2000? And pundits prematurely announcing McCain’s political death last year?

Some things are just too close to call.

Paula RooneyPaula Rooney is a Boston-based writer who has followed the tech industry for almost two decades. See her full profile and disclosure of her industry affiliations.

Email Paula Rooney

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 63 Talkback(s)
RE: Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybe
"Is it fraud because a company you hate helped get a standard accepted?"

There's help, and then there's bribery (vide Sweden).... (Read the rest)
Posted by: troutmaskreplica Posted on: 04/01/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Fraud and corruption is the new International standard.  mark@... | 03/31/08
I read one comment...  bportlock | 03/31/08
Just go to Groklaw.com. [nt]  Arm A. Geddon | 03/31/08
Irregularities  TheTruthisOutThere@... | 03/31/08
How silly of me ....  bportlock | 03/31/08
Well, something we agree on.  TheTruthisOutThere@... | 03/31/08
The truth is out there ...  mark@... | 03/31/08
heard it all before.  TheTruthisOutThere@... | 03/31/08
happy  llval@... | 03/31/08
happy  bportlock | 03/31/08
Re: Fraud and corruption.  Arm A. Geddon | 03/31/08
Yes, but Microsoft won anyway.  Anton Philidor | 03/31/08
It may be a pyrric victory, anyway.  bearded-grey | 03/31/08
Pyrrhic? Microsoft can afford the expense.  Anton Philidor | 03/31/08
Pyrrhic as in ODF specified by governments, etc.  j.m.galvin | 03/31/08
Could occur, but unlikely.  Anton Philidor | 03/31/08
they cAn rely on sycophants  llval@... | 03/31/08
Adequate documentation?  troutmaskreplica | 04/01/08
every major 500 comany ive worked for  pcguy777 | 03/31/08
Those are actually bad and spurious argments for OOXML  tracy anne | 03/31/08
Why is it fraud and corruption????  Narg | 03/31/08
Isn't that the problem?  NickNielsen | 03/31/08
Except when the standard can be implemented by only one company  tracy anne | 03/31/08
Interesting language  Fred Fredrickson | 03/31/08
RTF?  Arm A. Geddon | 03/31/08
No Single RTF--That's What's Wrong With It  dumptux | 03/31/08
A few things.  Arm A. Geddon | 03/31/08
Office 2007 Compliance  TheTruthisOutThere@... | 03/31/08
They never will ...  mark@... | 03/31/08
Actually  tracy anne | 03/31/08
Exhibit #3096  Sysadm1n | 03/31/08
Would that such exhibits  Ole Man | 03/31/08
cp compliance  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/31/08
Dana / Paula  bportlock | 03/31/08
German Standards body: 'Groklaw is full of beans'  Morgan_Reed | 03/31/08
Open should not always be free  pcguy777 | 03/31/08
German voting irregularities denied by German Standards Body  easson | 03/31/08
it is no translation  llval@... | 03/31/08
norway: 23 against 4 for, vote=for??? sure that's fair  stevey_d | 03/31/08
Norway: Formal protest  lordshipmayhem | 03/31/08
Interesting....  Sysadm1n | 03/31/08
RE: Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybe  dodo666 | 03/31/08
MS will have then effectively killed the standards process  Ole Man | 03/31/08
Separating the wheat from the chaff.........  Ole Man | 03/31/08
gates of chAos  llval@... | 03/31/08
Ole Man, that gate is strait,  mhenriday | 03/31/08
Check your sources..........  Ole Man | 03/31/08
Only as long as there is an OPEN standard...  Narg | 03/31/08
How different are ODF and OOXML anyway?  Narg | 03/31/08
The difference....  Sysadm1n | 03/31/08
Re: The difference..  hkommedal | 03/31/08
like chalk and cheese  bportlock | 03/31/08
Who got the boost??  techboy_z | 03/31/08
Fun Times  Speednet | 03/31/08
I agree.....  williamson.alan@... | 03/31/08
Huh?  Sysadm1n | 03/31/08
Why would we attack IBM?  ben.rattigan | 04/01/08
Czech republic votes yes, gets $44 Million discount from MS?  Sysadm1n | 03/31/08
RE: Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybe  jjoa | 03/31/08
MS better than Google  iashaik@... | 04/01/08
Re: OOXML, its a clean and nice format.  hkommedal | 04/01/08
RE: Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybe  jjoa | 03/31/08
RE: Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybe  troutmaskreplica | 04/01/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here