On The Insider: Cyrus FamilyOn the Loss of Bus Driver
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 7th, 2008

Sun's continuing open source problem

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 8:33 am

Categories: General, Not Linux, Strategy, Sun Microsystems, business models, java, management, values

Tags: Commitment, Sun Microsystems Inc., Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

Wedding Bands from Affordableweddingbands.comDespite its best efforts Sun Microsystems still has a big open source problem.

Commitment. (Affordable Wedding Bands sells rings in both gold and platinum.)

Any salesman is expecting a commitment from a buyer. But an open source salesman is expecting a deeper commitment. A commitment of time, even an emotional commitment.

Those commitments are necessary before you can expect someone else to write code for you, fix bugs for you, and test code they know is inferior.

The problem for Sun is this must be a two-way commitment.

When people read that Sun was even thinking of taking mySQL back, or listen to executives moan about the open source business model, it raises questions. Questions which all the blog postsĀ in the world won’t answer.

It comes back to the problem I discussed yesterday. If you’re focused on the gold you’re not focused on the straw. These commitments of time and energy are the straw.

Anything which distracts Sun from that focus on the commitment its non-paying customers already have to it limits its chances of making money.

This is not a problem proprietary brands have. There the commitment is limited to a financial one, and both sides of the transaction understand the limits, which are specified in the contract.

But open source demands more than a financial commitment of its users. And if you want to earn that trust, you must be committed in turn. Committed to the open source process, and committed to the idea of commitment.

If that makes open source sound like a marriage, well it does. Every user who depends on a project is putting sweat equity into it. They feel as much a part of the project as its nominal sponsor.

Undestand that, commit to it, and you can make a success in open source. Focus only on the money and you don’t stand a chance.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 14 Talkback(s)
No other Unix open source?
As opposed to Linux open source, I assume you mean. It should be noted here that IBM still does a good business with its proprietary version of Unix, AIX.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: DanaBlankenhorn Posted on: 05/08/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Sun executives are ******* morons...  jackbond | 05/07/08
Stupid moron  Kaiwai | 05/07/08
Can't rely on their hardware?  jackbond | 05/07/08
To Sun's credit  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 05/08/08
The most they can hope for is goodwill.  peter_erskine@... | 05/07/08
And that helps the bottom line how?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/07/08
Sun is not a hardware company  RamonFHerrera | 05/07/08
Ahahahahahahaha  jackbond | 05/07/08
Yes, we can be grateful to them  peter_erskine@... | 05/08/08
Sun's market cap less than 1/3 of Yahoo  archerjoe | 05/08/08
RE: Sun's continuing open source problem  zdnet@... | 05/08/08
Are you kidding?  green alien | 05/08/08
No other Unix open source?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 05/08/08
Any big organization is difficult to turn around  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 05/08/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads