On GameFAQs: What causes the Red Ring of Death?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 10th, 2008

Open source and military procurement don't mix

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:46 am

Categories: General, Government, IBM, Infrastructure, Security, business models, management, politics

Tags: Procurement, U.S. House, Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

Mike Mullen, chair, Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. MilitaryThe U.S. House has inserted language advocating open source into the latest military procurement bill.

But it will take more than a report, or rhetoric, to make open source happen for our Armed Forces, as I learned while covering the VA’s troubles at ZDNet Healthcare.

(To the right, current joint chief chair Admiral Mike Mullen. Salute, maggot.)

Open source requires a do it yourself (DIY) attitude, and our military does not have one. The habits of procurement, buy not make, were ingrained long before Dick Cheney ever took the reins at Halliburton Corp.

Say you are building a house, and face a choice between going to Home Depot and hiring a crew or just signing a contractor. The first choice costs less money, but the second may lead to a better built house.

That’s the nice way of putting it.

Or look at it from a General’s perspective. You can sign contracts for parts or bigger contracts for systems. The latter course is not only easier, it makes you a virtual Congressman, subject to the same pleasures and temptations.

After a long career spent doing, simple buying is a better gig.

So the Pentagon buys systems, and when it needs something done it contracts out. That’s the mentality.

A proprietary system can be managed easily under a contract. No one in the military need worry about how it’s built or what it does. So those skills atrophy, disappear.

Then open source comes along. While there are some vendors, like IBM, which offer a soup-to-nuts “we’ll handle it” approach with open source components, procurement officers don’t see the advantage. IBM absorbs the cost savings as profit.

To really take advantage of open source you need IT experts who can do their own programming and de-bugging. Those skills are in short supply within today’s military.

The whole idea of open source and the military opens up a broader debate about make-or-buy decisions, one with big implications not just for the budget but for how we run the Defense Department.

That’s a debate politicians and advocates may be happy to have. With two wars to fight, and more possibly on the way, it’s one the military would rather put off.

But for how long?

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 31 Talkback(s)
Right with you daengbo.
Perhaps Dana is a peacenic whose enthusiasm for his cause has led to him loosing his marbles like this.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: elderlybloke Posted on: 09/12/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Horses for courses  Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/10/08
And if Blackwater soldiers are less expensive?  Anton Philidor | 09/10/08
Blackwater soldiers are better than our troops?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 09/10/08
Blackwater soldiers often are our troops.  Anton Philidor | 09/10/08
Pay has very little to with contracting out  thinking about consequences | 09/10/08
Reason?  Anton Philidor | 09/10/08
DOD may have to pay more  John L. Ries | 09/10/08
Gee, Anton  Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/10/08
An army travels on its stomach.  Anton Philidor | 09/10/08
Correct  John L. Ries | 09/10/08
Would the congressional language advocating open source...  Anton Philidor | 09/10/08
It could be interpreted that way  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 09/10/08
Likely results.  Anton Philidor | 09/10/08
Custom programming  John L. Ries | 09/10/08
Why not just increase the civilian workforce?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 09/10/08
No objections  John L. Ries | 09/10/08
What's the alternative?  Anton Philidor | 09/10/08
That would need to be written into the contract  John L. Ries | 09/10/08
Um...are you forgetting...  techboy_z | 09/10/08
Good point  John L. Ries | 09/10/08
DARPANet was the 1970s  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 09/10/08
TAO  shis-ka-bob | 09/10/08
Here's just one example...  techboy_z | 09/10/08
So, what choice do you do when adding on to your house?  GuidingLight | 09/10/08
You might well pay someone, but...  John L. Ries | 09/10/08
A proprietary system can be managed easily under a contract  rcpr@... | 09/10/08
Military Projects  tbshmkr | 09/10/08
So why not share it?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 09/10/08
Attribution & Responsibility  tbshmkr | 09/11/08
Maggot?  daengbo | 09/11/08
Right with you daengbo.  elderlybloke | 09/12/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here