On TechRepublic: 10 biggest failures in IT history
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 30th, 2008

Is Sprint Clearwire a game changer?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 8:19 am

Categories: General, Google, Internet, Strategy, business models, mass market, mobile, telecom, wireless

Tags: Game, Mobile, Clearwire Corp., Broadband, AT&T Corp., Sprint Communications, Bandwidth Cap, Contracts, AT&T Obviously, WiMAX

Sprint Clearwire logo from CNETThe devil is in the details but it could become one.

The launch of Clearwire’s WiMax service in Baltimore, under the brand name Xohm, has already drawn protests from consumer advocates complaining that its acceptable use policy allows Sprint to impose bandwidth caps.

WiMax, or 802.16, can use licensed or unlicensed frequencies to deliver speed up to 75 Mbps with cell towers three miles apart. The addition of mobility specs in 2005 made this competitive with cellular as well as fixed broadband, in theory.

Nearly every ISP contract now includes language limiting usage. A single user running BitTorrent non-stop can slow others’ traffic on just about any system out there. The problem needs a technical fix and until we get one everyone is applying a legal band-aid.

But as our own John Morris notes, Clearwire’s pricing of $25/month for home access and $30/month for mobile, without a contract, is more than competitive.

If the bandwidth cap is competitive with cable, it means you can dump your cable modem and get mobile broadband anywhere free.

That is, if the bandwidth cap is competitive. And as John Karl Bode at DSLReports notes, that’s your problem. Contracts are so vague you can’t be certain of anything.

When T-Mobile put a 1 GB cap on service with Android, they were hammered for it, so they put in a vague clause in the Terms of Service that might just mean the same thing.

AT&T obviously thinks this could be a game-changer. Otherwise, why are they working so hard to stop it?

They are not protesting Verizon’s purchase of AllTel, which will push AT&T’s mobile service back to second place in market share. (Oh, right. AT&T tried to do the same deal before Verizon swooped in.)

C|Net’s own Marguerite Reardon is skeptical this deal can work, and unless credit markets unfreeze any new build is dicey. Too many partners, she says, and WiMax development may lag as cellular networks move to the competing LTE standard.

Maybe. But if you combine the cost of today’s fixed and mobile broadband you pay $130/month, after taxes. If Clearwire can bring that in for half the price, with equal service and a decent TOS, I would switch in a heartbeat.

And so would others.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 2 Talkback(s)
RE: Is Sprint Clearwire a game changer?
Looking forward to changing - range will not be an issue if the towers are there and if they are building on the existing cell towers then they have more than enough range for most users.

Way to go Sprint!!... (Read the rest)
Posted by: srhummer@... Posted on: 10/01/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Free Enterprize  jeff1@... | 09/30/08
RE: Is Sprint Clearwire a game changer?  srhummer@... | 10/01/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads