On TV.com: LOST Season 6. Premiere Date. Announced.
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 24th, 2008

Microsoft releases Singularity under unapproved license

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 8:14 am

Categories: Development, Distributions, General, Legal, Microsoft, education, mobile

Tags: Microsoft Corp., Singularity, Blogging, Internet, Dana Blankenhorn

Scales of JusticeMicrosoft has released some important code under an open source license — psych.

As with the image of blind justice to the right, you can look but you better not touch.

Singularity is the name of the project, a microkernel in which the kernel, drivers and applications are all under managed code. But the Microsoft Research License (MSR-LA) under which it is offered is not approved by the OSI.

The license allows only academic twiggling and any improvements go back to Redmond. Businesses can neither use it nor incorporate it in what they do under the license.

Had Microsoft wanted to make an open source release it has pushed two such licenses through the OSI process — the Microsoft Public License and the Microsoft Reciprocal License.  It chose not to do this.

Instead it’s using MSR-LA, which as Palamida’s GPL3 blog notes is “free as in beer, not free speech.”

It is certainly intended to keep all creative work produced under it within the scope of the Singularity research project and also within Microsoft itself. The restriction on the code being “subjected” to the various terms of other licenses effectively isolates the code from being used with seemingly anything outside of this particular project. If the goal is to experiment and do research to develop new techniques and tools, the possibilities here seem unusually limited.

It is true that some academics who like to play with Microsoft code, and support Microsoft technologies like .Net, will find value here.

But everyone else needs to be wary. Lawyers bite. And Microsoft’s are hungry.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 6 Talkback(s)
The research licence is not that bad
Remember its purpose is Research and you do get to keep any code you add and you can keep that code private read Galen Hunts comments on that.

Its worth noting Singularity is not designed as a ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: bklooste Posted on: 05/18/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
You hit it on the head  GuidingLight | 11/24/08
Hence the momentum is behind sharing, not self-interested greed.  fr0thy2 | 11/25/08
And look! No one cares!  dave.leigh@... | 11/25/08
Black Hat Researchers  PlanBForOpenOffice | 11/26/08
Makes ALL developers want to rush right out and grab a copy  Ole Man | 11/26/08
The research licence is not that bad  bklooste | 05/18/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here