On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 25th, 2008

When bandwidth is free

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 9:42 am

Categories: 2008 Review, 2009 Preview, General, Government, Internet, Legal, business models, mass market, telecom, wireless

Tags: Bandwidth, Monopoly, Internet, Dana Blankenhorn

Erie Canal 1829, from the University of RochesterIf you haven’t heard this already it bears repeating. (Picture from the University of Rochester.)

Internet bandwidth is essential infrastructure.

Like freeway lanes, like sea and airports, the quality and price of your Internet bandwidth determines how much it costs to do intellectual business with you.

Open source and open spectrum are incompatible with monopoly gatekeepers. They create unnecessary economic friction. They make American intellectual goods increasingly non-competitive at a time they must become more competitive.

For a decade America has been stuck in what is increasingly the Internet slow lane.

Government-granted monopolies have allowed the Bellheads and cable head-ends to violate Moore’s Law, taking all improvements for themselves and hiking the price of bits to you.

The response to that by the market has been software, programs like LibTorrent, and applications using it like Miro. My January piece on the two was the 7th most popular blog post here for 2008.

In retrospect my praise was premature. The monopolists had another card up their sleeve, one they have now played. Bit caps.

By strictly limiting the number of bits you can transfer on your “unlimited” plans, the monopolists have made it plain to all that their agenda is to limit economic growth and demand rents from all 21st century economic activity.

OPEC has nothing on AT&T, Verizon and Comcast.

What was, at the start of this decade, a way to eliminate economic gatekeepers in intellectual activity has become, today, the equivalent of an early 19th century turnpike or canal monopoly.

These concessions, and later concessions given railroad companies, were necessary in order to construct what was deemed essential infrastructure.

Without government support such projects as the Erie Canal and the Transcontinental Railroad would not have been built when they were.

The Internet must not be subject to such economics. It costs less-and-less to move bits about, in fact, every year, as transceivers and radios improve. Those improvements are being denied the public, and the economy.

Monopolists have, so far, convinced people in both parties that they are essential to the maintenance of the Internet. They are not. The Internet was a network-of-networks from the beginning, and must become one again.

Let 2009 begin the task of breaking this monopoly, of freeing the bits, and of getting economic growth going again.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 36 Talkback(s)
don't be afraid
There's no chance of this, he'll just write in "exceptions" to all of his "honest" and "open" policies, so "No Lobbyists" can equal "Only lobbyists I really really like".

... (Read the rest)
Posted by: coffeeshark Posted on: 02/10/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
When bandwidth is free  ShoreLeave | 12/25/08
My Obama fear  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 12/25/08
NT  MGP2 | 12/25/08
My Obama fear  ShoreLeave | 12/25/08
My Obama fear is that he'll be too good and honest  fr0thy2 | 12/28/08
don't be afraid  coffeeshark | 02/10/09
amen to this!!!  eggmanbubbagee@... | 12/25/08
The solution is simple:  Lerianis | 12/25/08
I would rather see competition  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 12/25/08
Competition isn't going to work  Lerianis | 12/25/08
You are simply wrong  frgough | 12/25/08
Inflamatory jargon  sir4taye@... | 12/26/08
Clearly, We Need a New Version of Godwin's Law  drprod@... | 12/29/08
Oh yes, it could  zdmo | 12/26/08
I partly agree with you  hamobu | 12/26/08
Free market is OK, IF no consistent national approach is required  Patanjali | 12/26/08
Too much competition = confusion  Patanjali | 12/26/08
Competition doesn't always work...  BitTwiddler | 12/28/08
That's called a dedicated circuit e.g., T1, T3, or OC3C connection  georgeou | 12/28/08
Free market Vs. Public Works  hamobu | 12/25/08
I agree 100%  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 12/25/08
Common carrier  daengbo | 12/26/08
RE: When bandwidth is free  jprescott12@... | 12/25/08
There is no difference today  frgough | 12/25/08
Lobbyist?  sir4taye@... | 12/26/08
Typical muddy thinking  frgough | 12/25/08
How often?  MGP2 | 12/25/08
I've seen both sides of the fence.  sir4taye@... | 12/26/08
Yeah! like in Somalia  hamobu | 12/26/08
The Middle Path: Balance  Patanjali | 12/26/08
Maybe you should use more arguments and less vitriol  hamobu | 12/26/08
Dude, give it a rest. Jeez...  BitTwiddler | 12/28/08
We Need Rachel Maddow to Say "Infrastructure" To You in a Husky Voice  drprod@... | 12/29/08
RE: When bandwidth is free  mech1164 | 12/26/08
RE: When bandwidth is free  Bob.Kerns | 12/26/08
Unlimited Plans  daengbo | 12/26/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here