On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 25th, 2008

Open source business models must be voluntary

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 10:12 am

Categories: 2009 Preview, Development, FOSS, General, Strategy, business models, management

Tags: Entrepreneur, Business Model, Kibble, Entrepreneurship, Strategy, Open Source, Management, Dana Blankenhorn

Kaleidecat from 1980Entrepreneur Dave Rosenberg has a Christmas wish for you.

(This is the first cat my wife and I owned. Mouse over to get the name for this Cat of Christmas past.)

Dave wants to make everyone pay for open source in 2009.

Money is the fuel that keeps things going. Entrepreneurs are in business to make money. It is reasonable for entrepreneurs  to dream of getting more money out of people.

But Dave is missing an essential point. In an open source world, business models must be voluntary.

This is the opposite of the way proprietary models work, and thus it’s difficult even today for people to get their minds around it.

Proprietary models are all compulsory. You want the PC, you buy the Microsoft license. You want the anti-viral, you pay for the daily updates. You give me money, I give you value.

What is wrong with this picture? In open source, code is eventually worth nothing. Once a program is out for a time and debugged to a reasonable degree it’s not even a widget.

It’s a cat. 

A cat has enormous economic utility but, for the most part, no economic value. Kibble is very cheap, and if the cat goes outside you don’t need litter either.

So what is necessary for getting and maintaining open source code is the equivalent of kibble. The cat earns its kibble by showing its owner love. Smart open source communities do the same thing.

If you want to build new code, of course, you need more than kibble. You need capital. Capital requires a business model. Business models don’t run on kibble, but the promise of a high return.

Still, the business model you choose must be voluntary. It must not be compulsory, because people are free to just go online and get an acceptable alternative at little or no cost.

The difficulty of this, the need to constantly innovate not just in terms of code but in terms of business models, dawned on many in this space over the last year.

As I said at the top, it is reasonable that an entrepreneur would wish this not be so. But you don’t build businesses on wishes. You build them by creating value people are glad to pay for.

This is what I will be looking for in 2009, value that makes me want to open my wallet. The days of compulsion in software business models are over. Build other dreams, and better.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 16 Talkback(s)
"concomitant effects on people's livelihoods"?
Tell me the percentage of developers that develop shrink-wrap software vs. those that develop directly for in-house software, please.

The vast majority of IT professionals BENEFIT from open ... (Read the rest)

Posted by: imric_z Posted on: 12/29/08  (Edited: 12/29/08 @ 11:59) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I didn't miss the point about voluntary models  daverosenberg@... | 12/25/08
It may be the headline is the problem  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 12/25/08
So did you just read the headline before blogging about it? (nt)  readwrite | 12/25/08
Great way to think about Open source  hamobu | 12/25/08
You missed the point  opensourceadvocate | 12/25/08
RE: Open source business models must be voluntary  fr0thy2 | 12/26/08
Not the business model  Anton Philidor | 12/26/08
I disagree.  bjbrock | 12/26/08
Against the tide  Anton Philidor | 12/26/08
You have a way with words, Anton  Ole Man | 12/26/08
"concomitant effects on people's livelihoods"?  imric_z | 12/29/08
Open source = Only what is done with the source code  Patanjali | 12/27/08
All software usage is voluntary, but the bail cost can be high  Patanjali | 12/27/08
Exclusive, yes. Proprietary, no.  dave.leigh@... | 12/27/08
Modified code is under GPL. Calling code is not?  Patanjali | 12/29/08
The Devil is in the Details  dave.leigh@... | 12/29/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More