January 5th, 2009
Benefits of a commercial open source arm
One of my great Eurofriends linked me to his 2009 predictions piece over the holidays, noting that companies like Acquia are “appropriating returns from the commons.”
This may be one of the great misunderstandings of the open source era, and a big part of the FOSS-open source split.
Commercial open source, some think, does indeed “appropriate returns from the commons.” I, on the other hand, believe such operations are a net benefit to the commons.
Let me offer the example of Acquia, the commercial arm for Drupal, because I have both personal experience and news to bring to bear.
The experience came four years ago. I was asked to help launch an open source site for politics. I recommended Drupal for its scalability, but the company failed, in part because we could not develop the site quickly enough.
Since Drupal.org only provided a directory of possible assistance, we wound up dealing with an Indian outsourcer my partner was familiar with.
Their claim of expertise was false. I spent months trying to explain what we needed, and each iteration of the software grew worse. We finally got things rolling after another consultant turned us on to the new, stable Drupal code base.
By then it was too late. The business model was flawed in any case. I wound up blogging about politics, reading political blogs and summarizing their messages, but traffic was never more than a trickle, and interactivity was virtually nil.
Should I get another opportunity, I will know more of what to do. I’ll be able to get the help I need through Acquia. I’ll pay for it, but I will have an effective site in a short period of time, and technical management will be done by techies, not journalists.
There’s a second benefit to the commercial model, add-ons. An example is Kaltura. This makes any Drupal site immediately video-capable. (There are also versions for other systems.)
A commercial arm retains a project’s market share, and its development momentum, so that add-ons gravitate toward it. I am certain that Drupal sites launched in 2009 will be light years ahead of those from four years ago.
They have to be, because much has happened since 2005. It’s no longer enough to support blogs, or diaries, or to do them in a scaled manner. Now you have to support a host of other files, and social networking functions.
A CMS system, like any system, must continually progress to stay relevant. Commercial arms help open source projects meet this competition, at the same time they provide a business model which feeds the lead developers.
It’s not an appropriation from the commons at all.
Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.
Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.
