On CNET: Start your tech shopping now
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 6th, 2009

Will Cisco-FSF lawsuit make it to court?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:39 am

Categories: GPL, General, Legal, Linux, Software Licensing

Tags: GPL, Lawsuit, Free Software Foundation, Cisco Systems Inc., Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

Cisco CEO John Chambers, from the Cisco Web siteUnlikely.

Since filing its GPL violation suit against Cisco last month, the Free Software Foundation has grown very quiet.

Christmas was a good excuse. New Year’s too. But the holidays are over, yet still not a creature is stirring, not even a mouse.

Thus reporters have been ordered to investigate the case. They called some lawyers, even some good ones, and see trouble ahead for the FSF.

Cisco has good lawyers. Any decision, even on the FSF’s terms, will then be used to limit rights under the GPL.

My guess is negotiations are continuing because neither side has a real incentive to go to court.

The language of any legal decision would likely be less clear than the clear language of the GPL 2. But if the GPL can be challenged successfully, so can every EULA out there — including Cisco’s own.

In my view the GPL 2 is one of the clearest legal documents ever written. As clear as the Constitution itself. Which has been litigated continuously since its adoption, with court decisions that often turned plain language into its opposite.

It’s like the difference between writing for a paper (or a blog) and writing an academic paper.

The latter may be dry and turgid, but it is specific, nailing down what prettier words might obscure. Most litigation seems to have the goal of turning plain language into academic language.

The difference between legal writing and academic writing is that the former always has wiggle room. Decisions depend on what the meaning of is is.

My guess is neither side wants to go down that rabbit hole. Cisco wants to save face, but the FSF won’t be played for a fool.

It’s time for Cisco to make a decision, because every day now costs the FSF money, which will raise the cost of a final settlement. Unless it wants its contribution to the economic stimulus to come in the form of legal fees.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 6 Talkback(s)
FSF are trying Cisco on Copyright NOT GPL
If they were trying to uphold the GPL they would be taking Cisco to court for breaches of the GPL,

BUT THEY ARE NOT !! they dont have the confidence to test the shaky GPL in a court of law, an... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Aussie_Troll Posted on: 01/31/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Normal litigation delay  Rick_R | 01/06/09
That is sometimes true  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 01/06/09
No price tag on the software...  John L. Ries | 01/07/09
I imagine cisco will cut a deal.. seems the most logical given...  Been_Done_Before | 01/06/09
Agree with the clarity comments  John L. Ries | 01/07/09
FSF are trying Cisco on Copyright NOT GPL  Aussie_Troll | 01/31/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here