On mySimon: Oprah's Favorite Things
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 19th, 2009

Texas Democrats push ODF standard

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 11:08 am

Categories: Enterprise Policy, General, Government, Microsoft, Standards, content, politics

Tags: Texas, Democrat, OpenDocument Format, OpenDocument Format (ODF), Open Source, Emerging Technologies, Dana Blankenhorn

Texas Democrats are trying to make open source into a partisan issue.

Their vehicle is HB 481, authored by Marc Veasey of Ft. Worth, who has sought to make a reputation as a thorn in the side of Texas’ ruling Republicans, supporting hate crimes legislation, mass transit, and the Obama stimulus.

That is another way of saying the bill’s chances fall somewhere east of slim and west of none.

What’s amusing are some of the arguments against the bill, as compiled by Aman Betheja of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

The main argument, advanced by a Microsoft lobbyist, is that the bill is anti-competitive, and would be “like choosing Betamax over VHS.”

There is also a fear that users would have to replace their current software, although I believe Microsoft has been pretty scrupulous in supporting the Open Document Format.

It’s the fact that this is being discussed at all that is newsworthy. The rise of open source as a partisan issue, whether pushed by Tories in England, Hindu nationalists in India, or Democrats in Texas, has been remarkable.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 47 Talkback(s)
Because ODF is NOT controlled by Microsoft.
Anything NOT controlled by microsoft will be a superior standard. 'Nuff said. (Read the rest)
Posted by: SpikeyMike Posted on: 05/20/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
MS view is anti-competitive when using an open standard  LittleGuy | 03/19/09
the bill is supported by smart Texans  Linux Geek | 03/19/09
...and I'm one of them...  storm14k | 03/19/09
LOL  TripleII | 03/19/09
I think this was my point....  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/20/09
Socialism just keeps rearing its ugly head  P. Douglas | 03/19/09
Open standards that force competition on the merits, benefits the whole  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
I'm all for open standards, however ...  P. Douglas | 03/19/09
Precisely to save taxpayer money!! Supporting two standards would be very  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
Right, save money  GuidingLight | 03/19/09
Even Microsoft can not name anything lacking in the ODF standard that is  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
I've got a custom made titanium mountain bike to sell you.  kozmcrae | 03/19/09
Using OpenXML ...  P. Douglas | 03/19/09
If Microsoft ever finally implements the standard, we might talk about it.  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
Not one program in existence supports it.  TripleII | 03/19/09
That is not true  P. Douglas | 03/19/09
In other words, MS still does not support the OSI standard! But, in any  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
Not one certified compliant.  TripleII | 03/19/09
There is no "OpenXML" standard  Fred Fredrickson | 05/19/09
Your opinion and  bjbrock | 03/19/09
Die hard conservative here.  TripleII | 03/19/09
please read ...  P. Douglas | 03/19/09
I did, what's your point?  TripleII | 03/19/09
Socialism? Are Britain's conservatives now Socialists?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/20/09
GPL'd OSS is socialist  P. Douglas | 03/21/09
Google competes fiercely using GPL code to build their server network. And,  DonnieBoy | 03/22/09
Okay then. This is what you do:  nizuse | 05/19/09
Why push ODF? It should be about standards.  Rob Oakes | 03/19/09
No, states can and should insist on a single standard, as taxpayer dollars  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
Did you pay attention to the standardization?  rpmyers1 | 03/19/09
ODF migration has issues  P. Douglas | 03/19/09
Only minor formating problems, but, in any case, propegating the rats nest  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
But that is the problem with Open Office  GuidingLight | 03/19/09
And, again, not even Microsoft can name what is missing in ODF to  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
MP3 work for you?  TripleII | 03/19/09
Here is your fist valid point.  TripleII | 03/19/09
Nobody support OOXML, many support ODF.  TripleII | 03/19/09
Why ODF?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/20/09
Because ODF is NOT controlled by Microsoft.  SpikeyMike | 05/20/09
It is quite obvious  GuidingLight | 03/19/09
Taxpayer money is the number one responsibility of polititions, and, the  DonnieBoy | 03/19/09
Taxpayer Money  Col Mustard | 03/20/09
Misses the point.  TripleII | 03/20/09
the point  Col Mustard | 03/20/09
Yet another invalid post.  TripleII | 03/19/09
RE: Texas Democrats push ODF standard  Col Mustard | 03/20/09
1 out 4 ain't so bad.  wkulecz | 05/20/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and