On TechRepublic: Why Android beats iPhone
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 1st, 2005

Separating copyright and copyleft

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 6:12 pm

Categories: Development, General, Legal, Software Licensing

Tags:

Palamida and Black Duck both signed deals that, according to News.Com, assure that open source projects are not "polluted" by proprietary code.

Both deals are with the same sources — Eclipse and Sourceforge. Palamida and Black Duck will automate checks on these sources, and corporations will (supposedly) pay through the nose for the resulting assurance. Financial terms on the deals were not disclosed.

But here’s my point.

This should work both ways, and I hope those who manage open source code understand it. Most open source projects aren’t equipped with teams of lawyers. I’d love to see a super-team of lawyers, using these tools, riding herd on every proprietary software outfit out there to make sure no GPL code gets into their stuff, ever again.

But I’m not holding my breath.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 2 Talkback(s)
Backwards?
You must be seeing different material from Black Duck than I am. Most of what I've seen has been oriented towards proprietary companies making sure that coders aren't slipping in F/OSS without author... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Yagotta B. Kidding Posted on: 08/01/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Considering how much I hate lawyers...  Linux User 147560 | 08/01/05
Backwards?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/01/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here