On CHOW: Use leftovers wisely
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 17th, 2009

Washington state rejects open source

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:38 am

Categories: Applications, Enterprise Policy, General, Government, Microsoft, management, politics

Tags: Washington, Agency, Microsoft Corp., Josh Dressel, OpenOffice, Advertising & Promotion, Open Source, Office Suites, Software, Marketing

National, state and local governments are all waking up to the opportunity open source offers to save money, to do more, and to collaborate.

Washington state, the home of Microsoft, appears to be an exception. At least to hear Josh Dressel tell it. (Washington entered the Union on the 100th anniversary of President Washington’s inauguration.)

Dressel, an IT specialist in Olympia, the state capitol, writes a blog called the Chrome Toaster, where he has detailed his unsuccesful efforts to wean his employer, the state’s Department of Natural Resources, from Microsoft.

It started when Dressel submitted a proposal to avoid lay-offs in the department through the use of OpenOffice. The response was to ignore him and raise the executive drawbridges.

Dressel did what most people would do. He wrote his state representative. He was motivated by the fact that lay-offs are to begin May 1 and, as a squeaky wheel, he might naturally fear getting greased.

See if his summary of the situation doesn’t match up with what you have found at your place of business:

 Our agency is vendor driven. I believe the entire state might be similar in nature. Instead of contacting vendors after consultants and R&D has put time into mapping agency needs, vendors contact those individuals with purchasing authority and pitch the merchandise they claim works best. This might get the job done, but it is an inefficient way of doing business.

Dressel has expanded his proposal to using Zimbra as well as OpenOffice, which he says will save $1.8 million. Zimbra would replace the department’s present Exchange Server, OpenOffice would replace Microsoft Office.

He says the initial cost of doing all this is not monetary, but staff time, and the department has staff. He concludes, “The status of IT at the DNR is we continue to be a Microsoft shop without any sound data to back staying this course.”

It will be interesting to see if Dressel’s name is on the lay-off list, and whether the local press picks up on his crusade.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 44 Talkback(s)
$318
The figure of $318 is what our agency pays per machine for a license of Microsoft Office. I got the figure from the IT specialist who manages our licensing. She also gave me the figures for the number of PCs we currently pay a license fee for, which is 1,930 machines.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ChromeToaster Posted on: 04/20/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Perfect example...  Stuka | 04/17/09
Brain dead moron  jackbond | 04/17/09
Apparently...  Stuka | 04/17/09
In this case  Michael Kelly | 04/17/09
Just what problem is he trying to solve with the move to Open Office?  ye | 04/17/09
Might want to reread the article  dragosani | 04/17/09
Reading comprehension fail  User 13 | 04/17/09
Apparently so.  ye | 04/17/09
Or for the sake of keeping his own job  GuidingLight | 04/17/09
what problem?  ChromeToaster | 04/17/09
Where did the $318 number come from?  ye | 04/18/09
$318  ChromeToaster | 04/20/09
RE: Washington state rejects open source  JoseTorr | 04/17/09
True  wayne62682 | 04/17/09
Actually, MS Office is quite expensive, and the average user just types  DonnieBoy | 04/17/09
Hey, it is DonnieBoy  GuidingLight | 04/17/09
I work for a Government Agency in California  Confused by religion | 04/17/09
That's exactly what the guy in Washington is saying  stevey_d | 04/17/09
Well, the obvious conclusion from your post is...  zkiwi | 04/18/09
RE: Washington state rejects open source  justthinking | 04/17/09
Still, a perfect time to get off of the treadmill, as they have the staff  DonnieBoy | 04/17/09
And what of the places  GuidingLight | 04/17/09
I Know Nothing  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 04/17/09
We need an example.  kozmcrae | 04/17/09
Well, that would make Windows the same as  GuidingLight | 04/17/09
Anyone have a status on the city of Munich migration?  ye | 04/17/09
Migration continuing  Richard Flude | 04/17/09
FAIL  Qbt | 04/17/09
Your links are pathetic.  kozmcrae | 04/17/09
Of course they're to the same migration.  ye | 04/18/09
a bunch of whiney, tearful old maids  Ole Man | 04/19/09
"Rather than lowering IT costs..."  ye | 04/17/09
WRONG: .. read the article  stevey_d | 04/17/09
No haste on my part. Because on page three we find:  ye | 04/18/09
Really? Consider page 4...  zkiwi | 04/18/09
No haste.  ye | 04/19/09
RE: Washington state rejects open source  tcoi | 04/17/09
You may want to check something.  kozmcrae | 04/17/09
"Microsoft is contributing billions to the State's economy" not in tax  stevey_d | 04/17/09
Microsoft's $528 million Washington tax break  Ole Man | 04/19/09
need more of this...  ChromeToaster | 04/19/09
RE: Washington state rejects open source  nostril | 04/17/09
RE: Washington state rejects open source  freeasinmarket | 04/19/09
Bribery goes a long way.....  Ole Man | 04/19/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here